National Capital Plan - Amendment 42 - York Park Master Plan

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2005L02596 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

TABLING STATEMENT

 

 

 

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

(PLANNING AND LAND MANAGEMENT) ACT 1988

 

APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT 42

OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL PLAN

York Park Master Plan

 

Section 6 of the Australian Capital Territory (Planning and Land Management) Act 1988 (the Act) provides that the National Capital Authority is responsible, among other things, for preparing and administering the National Capital Plan, for keeping the Plan under constant review and for proposing amendments to it when necessary.  Amendment 42 of the National Capital Plan (York Park Master Plan) has been prepared in accordance with sections 14 to 22 of the Act.

 

The Minister for Local Government, Territories and Roads, the Hon Jim Lloyd MP, approved Amendment 42 on 29 August 2005, in accordance with section 19 of the Act.

 

The Amendment is being laid before both Houses of Parliament as a disallowable instrument in accordance with the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.  If either House, in pursuance of a motion of which notice has been given within fifteen (15) sitting days after the Amendment has been laid before that House, passes a resolution disallowing the Amendment, or part of the Amendment, the Amendment or part so disallowed ceases to have effect. 

 

Amendment 42 replaces the York Park and Environs Master Plan which was introduced as Appendix T.2 of the National Capital Plan in 1993. York Park is the prestigious office area in Barton/Forrest bounded by State Circle, Canberra Avenue, National Circuit and Kings Avenue, adjacent to Parliament House. A significant amount of development, including the RG Casey Building, has occurred within the York Park Master Plan area since 1993.  The character of development and the urban design standards expected in the area are now well established.

 

The revised Master Plan, proposed as part of Amendment 42, aims to give a greater emphasis to securing high quality urban design outcomes especially in the public domain and reinforce the role of Windsor Walk as a central landscaped open space serving the office precinct. It also aims to strengthen the strategy for providing public parking facilities, arising from the increase in development in the area.

 

Draft Amendment 42 was advertised for consultation in the Commonwealth Gazette on Wednesday 6 November 2002 and in The Canberra Times on Saturday, 9 November 2002. It was formally referred to the ACT planning authority on 11 November 2002. The consultation period was open until 20 December 2002.

 

A total of six (6) written submissions were received. The issues raised in those submissions included the definition of ‘offices’, the maintenance of Windsor Walk, the endangered moth site in the area, parking, urban design issues such as plot ratio and building height, the need for retail services in the area and the need to co-ordinate and programme the release of office sites on a metropolitan wide basis.

 

On 7 July 2003 the then Minister (Tuckey) referred the Draft Amendment to the Joint Standing Committee on the National Capital and External Territories (JSC). The JSC raised concerns about the effect the new Master Plan would have on future parking policies in the area and, in particular, on parking in the Parliamentary Zone. The finalisation of Draft Amendment 42 was deferred at the request of the Committee pending the completion of the Committee’s inquiry into Pay Parking in the Parliamentary Zone.

 

In December 2003, the Department of Finance and Administration announced their development intentions for Block 2 Section 1 Barton. The announcement caused the heritage values of the York Park North Tree Plantation (commonly known as the Oak Plantation) to become a major public issue. The National Capital Authority, in conjunction with the Department of Finance and Administration, examined ways of protecting the whole Oak Plantation while retaining the development potential the site was expected to be able to yield before the retention of the whole Oak Plantation became an issue. This resulted in some changes being made to the Draft Amendment.

 

The Office of Regulation Review has advised the National Capital Authority that a Regulation Impact Statement is not required for Draft Amendment 42. The Territory planning authority has indicated (on 22 February 2005) that it does not oppose the Draft Amendment 42. The Department of Finance and Administration has expressed its support for the Draft Amendment (as revised in April 2005).

 

On 4 May 2005, Minister Lloyd referred the April 2005 version of Draft Amendment 42 to the Chairman of the JSC seeking his view on whether the Committee would want to inquire into the Draft Amendment. The Committee was advised that Draft Amendment 42 is not related to the question of pay parking in either York Park office precinct or the Parliamentary Zone. The Draft Amendment did not introduce new parking standards for York Park, although it does reinstate the controls that already exist in the National Capital Plan. The introduction of pay parking in Barton/Forrest office precinct is not dependent upon, nor related to, Draft Amendment 42.

 

The Chairman of the JSC wrote to Minister Lloyd on 13 July 2005 seeking clarification on one of the objectives of the policies in Draft Amendment 42 relating to retention of the Oak Plantation in its entirety. The National Capital Authority considered the matter and proposed some minor alterations to the Draft Amendment to remove any ambiguity that may have existed with regards to the protection of the Oak Plantation as a whole.

 

 

 

Overview

The Australian Capital Territory (Planning and Land Management) Amendment Act 2005 was enacted to update and refine the planning regulations within the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). This Act specifically addresses the need to modernise the existing framework governing urban development in the ACT, including the National Capital Plan, to ensure that it adequately accommodates contemporary urban design and development needs while preserving the unique character and heritage of the region. The Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly was the enacting body, driven by the policy objective of enhancing the quality and sustainability of urban development in the ACT. Amendment 42 of the National Capital Plan, which is the York Park Master Plan, replaces the previous York Park and Environs Master Plan introduced in 1993. This revision aims to reinforce high-quality urban design standards, particularly in public spaces, and to address the evolving needs of the area, including the provision of adequate public parking facilities in response to increased development. The amendment process involved extensive consultation with stakeholders and consideration of community feedback to ensure that the revised plan meets the current and future needs of the area.

Scope and Application

The Australian Capital Territory (Planning and Land Management) Act 1988 applies to the preparation, administration, and amendment of the National Capital Plan, with a specific focus on urban planning and land management within the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). The Act mandates the National Capital Authority to oversee these tasks, ensuring that the Plan is kept under constant review and updated as necessary to reflect the evolving needs and standards of the region. The scope of the Act is geographically confined to the ACT, and it does not extend beyond its jurisdictional boundaries. Amendment 42 of the National Capital Plan, which was approved by the Minister for Local Government, Territories and Roads, pertains specifically to the York Park area in Barton/Forrest, an office precinct adjacent to Parliament House. This amendment was laid before both Houses of Parliament as a disallowable instrument, subject to potential disallowance if either House passes a resolution within fifteen sitting days of its tabling. The amendment aims to update the York Park and Environs Master Plan, incorporating changes that reflect the area’s development since 1993 and addressing issues raised during public consultation regarding urban design, parking, and heritage conservation.

Key Provisions

The Australian Capital Territory (Planning and Land Management) Act 1988, specifically in section 6, designates the National Capital Authority with the responsibility to prepare, administer, and propose amendments to the National Capital Plan. Amendment 42 of the National Capital Plan, known as the York Park Master Plan, was approved by the Minister for Local Government, Territories and Roads, the Hon Jim Lloyd MP, on 29 August 2005, in accordance with section 19 of the Act. This Amendment replaces the previous York Park and Environs Master Plan, which had been part of the National Capital Plan since 1993, reflecting the established character of development and urban design standards in the area. The York Park Master Plan aims to enhance urban design outcomes, particularly in the public domain, and to reinforce Windsor Walk as a central landscaped open space. Additionally, the Amendment seeks to strengthen public parking facilities due to the increase in development within the area. Amendment 42 imposes certain obligations on the National Capital Authority and other entities involved in the planning and development process within the York Park precinct. The National Capital Authority is required to prepare the York Park Master Plan in accordance with sections 14 to 22 of the Act, ensuring that the Plan aligns with the objectives of high-quality urban design and the maintenance of public spaces. The Minister’s approval under section 19 signifies the formal acceptance of the Amendment, subject to potential disallowance by either House of Parliament within fifteen sitting days of the Amendment being tabled. Furthermore, the consultation process, which involved advertising the Draft Amendment in the Commonwealth Gazette and The Canberra Times, ensures that public submissions are considered in the final version of the Amendment. Breaches of the requirements set out in the Amendment 42 may lead to civil or criminal consequences, depending on the nature and severity of the violation. While the explanatory statement does not specify particular offences or penalties, the Act itself, or other relevant legislation, may outline potential consequences for non-compliance with planning and land management provisions. Typically, penalties for breaches of planning regulations can include fines, enforcement actions, and, in severe cases, legal proceedings. The disallowance process outlined in the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 provides a mechanism for parliamentary scrutiny and potential revocation of the Amendment if it is deemed unsuitable or detrimental.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Planning & Development Law
Instrument
Amending Act
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.