Military Rehabilitation and Compensation (Non-warlike Service) Determination 2012 (No. 3)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2012L01914 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Military Rehabilitation and Compensation (Non-warlike Service) Determination 2012 (No. 3)

 

This Determination revokes and replaces a previous determination made under paragraph 6(1)(b) of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the Act).  Paragraph 6(1)(b) of the Act defines non-warlike service as meaning service with the Australian Defence Force (the ADF) that is of a kind determined in writing by the Defence Minister to be non-warlike service for the purposes of the Act.

 

The purpose of this Determination is to detail the eighteenth operations which are considered to be non-warlike under the auspices of the Act. 

 

Clause 1 sets out the manner in which this Determination may be cited.

 

Clause 2 provides that the Determination commences on the day after it is registered.

 

Clause 3 revokes the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Determination (Non-warlike Service) 2012 (No. 2).

 

Clause 4 makes clear the definition of acronyms used throughout the Determination.

 

Clause 5 specifies that service in an operation described in Schedule 1 is non-warlike service for the purposes of paragraph 6(1)(b) of the Act.

 

Schedule 1 includes a new Item 18, Operation Quickstep Tonga.  This amendment recognises the ADF operation to assist the Government of Tonga with the restoration of law and order, in the described area of operation, as non-warlike for the purposes of paragraph 6(1)(b) of the Act. 

 

The references to the other operations in this Determination are identical to those set out previously in Determination 2012 (No. 2) except for item 16 where a minor editorial change has been made to reinstate the previously recorded end date which was inadvertently omitted in Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Determination (Non-warlike Service) 2012 (No. 2).  A further editorial change is the start date and end date columns have been combined into one column titled ‘Period’. Where a start date only is listed, the dash indicates the period is ongoing.  These changes have no effect on the members assigned to this operation.

 

This Determination does not affect the rights of any persons (other than the Commonwealth) so as to disadvantage those persons nor does it impose liabilities (other than on the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done before the date this Determination commences.

 

This Determination is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and is exempt from disallowance pursuant to item 6A of Schedule 2 of the Legislative Instruments Regulations 2004 and is also exempt from sunsetting pursuant to item 3A of Schedule 3 of the Regulations.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

 

This Determination is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

This Determination engages the following human rights:

  •   The right to health is the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (article 12(1) International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights),
  •    The right to social security requires a social security system be established and that a country must, within its maximum available resources, ensure access to a social security scheme (article 9 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights),
  •    The prohibition on interference with privacy and attacks on reputation (article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights),
  •    Live, take part and be included in the community (article 19 Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities).

The Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, (Non-warlike Service) Determination 2012 (No.3) establishes that service provided by ADF members on Operation Quickstep Tonga, is non warlike service for the purposes of paragraph 6(1)(b) of the Act. Operation Quickstep Tonga, an operation described in Schedule 1, was an operation to assist in the restoration the law and order in the Kingdom of Tonga,

Legitimate objective: Defence members who become ill or injured in the course of duty may require special assistance and support on return from that duty. Whether an injury or illness is seen as arising out of duty may depend on the nature of the service that the member has been required to perform. The actual decision about whether the nature of service will be warlike or non-warlike is made by the Executive, this determination simply ensures than the nature of service that a member provides is reflected in the level and type of benefits that they may be eligible for if they are ill or injured due to their Service.

 

Reasonable, necessary and proportionate: Determining the nature of service that a member has provided allows the relevant level of additional support to be provided to assist the member with the health care and other needs that they may have as a member. Benefits may also be provided to a member's dependants, who are directly affected by the additional needs that a member may have as a result of their illness or injury.

 

Although the application for benefits may require some provision of personal information and some limitation on the suppliers of health treatment and benefits that are provided, these restrictions are considered proportional:

  • the personal information is treated in accordance with legislated privacy protections, and
  • the benefits are additional to those provided to the general public and address a special need arising out of a member's injury or illness.

 

This Determination is compatible with human rights because to the extent that it may limit human rights, those limitations are reasonable, necessary and proportionate.

 

The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet and the Department of Veterans’ Affairs were consulted (by telephone and e-mail) during the classification process.  It is noted that decisions about the nature of service are subject to bipartisan consultation through Government and do not impact business or competition.

 

 

     Authority: Paragraph 6(1)(b) of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 

 

Overview

The Military Rehabilitation and Compensation (Non-warlike Service) Determination 2012 (No. 3) was enacted to address the need for a clear delineation of what constitutes non-warlike service for the purposes of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Government and was enacted to ensure that the nature of service provided by members of the Australian Defence Force is accurately reflected in the level of benefits they may be eligible for if they become ill or injured during their service. This determination specifically identifies certain operations as non-warlike, ensuring that appropriate support and compensation are provided to affected members and their dependents. The policy objective is to provide reasonable, necessary, and proportionate assistance to Defence members and their families, ensuring that the limitations on human rights are justified and balanced with the special needs arising from service-related injuries or illnesses.

Scope and Application

The Military Rehabilitation and Compensation (Non-warlike Service) Determination 2012 (No. 3) applies to ADF members who may have provided service in specific operations classified as non-warlike under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This Determination, which revokes and replaces a previous determination, explicitly identifies certain military operations as non-warlike service for the purposes of the Act, ensuring that ADF members who become ill or injured in these operations are eligible for appropriate rehabilitation and compensation. Notably, this includes Operation Quickstep Tonga, which involved assisting the Government of Tonga with the restoration of law and order. The geographic scope of this Determination is national, as it pertains to operations involving the ADF, an entity under the Commonwealth. While the Determination primarily impacts the ADF and its members, it does not disadvantage any other persons or impose liabilities on entities other than the Commonwealth. The Determination is exempt from disallowance and sunsetting, ensuring its continued applicability. This legislative instrument aligns with human rights by ensuring that any restrictions on personal information and service suppliers are reasonable, necessary, and proportionate, addressing the unique needs of ADF members injured or ill in the course of non-warlike service.

Key Provisions

The Military Rehabilitation and Compensation (Non-warlike Service) Determination 2012 (No. 3) (the Determination) is a legislative instrument that outlines which military operations are classified as non-warlike service under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the Act). Clause 5 of the Determination specifies that service in an operation described in Schedule 1 is considered non-warlike service for the purposes of paragraph 6(1)(b) of the Act (s. 5). Schedule 1 includes Operation Quickstep Tonga, which recognises the Australian Defence Force's (ADF) operation to assist the Government of Tonga with the restoration of law and order as non-warlike for the purposes of the Act (Schedule 1, Item 18). This classification is crucial because it determines the level of benefits that ADF members and their dependants may be eligible for if they become ill or injured during the service. The Determination imposes specific obligations on the ADF members and the entities involved in the operations listed in Schedule 1. It mandates that the nature of service provided during these operations be accurately classified as non-warlike, which influences the type and level of support and benefits available to affected members and their families (s. 5). This classification ensures that the benefits provided are additional to those available to the general public and specifically address the unique needs arising from the member's injury or illness. The classification process involves careful consideration of the nature of the service provided and ensures that any limitations on the provision of benefits are reasonable, necessary, and proportionate. The Determination outlines the consequences for non-compliance with its provisions. Although the Determination itself does not specify particular offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach, the Act under which it is made may impose such penalties. For example, under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, there are provisions for penalties for fraud or misrepresentation in the context of claims for benefits, which could apply if the nature of service is misclassified. The penalties for such offences can include fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity of the breach. The Determination also ensures that it is compatible with human rights, as stipulated in the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. It acknowledges that while it may limit certain human rights, these limitations are reasonable, necessary, and proportionate. The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet and the Department of Veterans' Affairs were consulted during the classification process to ensure that the Determination aligns with human rights standards. The Determination is exempt from disallowance and sunsetting, reinforcing its legal standing and applicability.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Military Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Prohibited Conduct
Rights & Protections

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.