Military Rehabilitation and Compensation (Non-warlike Service) Determination 2012 (No. 2)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2012L00779 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Military Rehabilitation and Compensation (Non-warlike Service) Determination 2012 (No. 2)

 

This Determination revokes and replaces a previous determination made under paragraph 6(1)(b) of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the Act).  Paragraph 6(1)(b) of the Act defines non-warlike service as meaning service with the Australian Defence Force (the ADF) that is of a kind determined in writing by the Defence Minister to be non-warlike service for the purposes of the Act.

 

The purpose of this Determination is to detail the seventeen operations which are considered to be non-warlike under the auspices of the Act. 

 

Clause 1 sets out the manner in which this Determination may be cited.

 

Clause 2 provides that the Determination commences on the day after it is registered.

 

Clause 3 revokes the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Determination (Non-warlike Service) 2012/1

 

Clause 4 makes clear the definition of acronyms used throughout the Determination.

 

Clause 5 specifies that service in an operation described in Schedule 1 is non-warlike service for the purposes of paragraph 6(1)(b) of the Act.

 

Schedule 1 includes a new Item 17, Operation Aslan.  This amendment recognises the ADF contribution to the United Nations Mission in the Republic of South Sudan, in the described area of operation, as non-warlike for the purposes of paragraph 6(1)(b) of the Act.    The references to the other operations in this Determination are identical to those set out previously in Determination 2012/1 except for item 1 where a minor editorial change has been made to the Nature of the Operation which corrects the description of the task.  This change has no affect on the members assigned to this operation.

 

This Determination does not affect the rights of any persons (other than the Commonwealth) so as to disadvantage those persons nor does it impose liabilities (other than on the Commonwealth) in respect of anything done before the date this Determination commences.

 

This Determination is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and is exempt from disallowance pursuant to item 6A of Schedule 2 of the Legislative Instruments Regulations 2004 and is also exempt from sunsetting pursuant to item 3A of Schedule 3 of the Regulations.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

 

This Determination is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

This Determination engages the following human rights:

  •   The right to health is the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (article 12(1) International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights),
  •    The right to social security requires a social security system be established and that a country must, within its maximum available resources, ensure access to a social security scheme (article 9 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights),
  •    The prohibition on interference with privacy and attacks on reputation (article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights),
  •    Live, take part and be included in the community (article 19 Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities).

The Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, (Non-warlike Service) Determination 2012(No.2) establishes that service provided by ADF members on Operation Aslan, is non warlike service for the purposes of paragraph 6(1)(b) of the Act. Operation Aslan, an operation described in Schedule 1, is an operation to maintain peace and stability in the Republic of South Sudan,

Legitimate objective: Defence members who become ill or injured in the course of duty may require special assistance and support on return from that duty. Whether an injury or illness is seen as arising out of duty may depend on the nature of the service that the member has been required to perform. The actual decision about whether the nature of service will be warlike or non-warlike is made by the Executive, this determination simply ensures than the nature of service that a member provides is reflected in the level and type of benefits that they may be eligible for if they are ill or injured due to their Service.

 

Reasonable, necessary and proportionate: Determining the nature of service that a member has provided allows the relevant level of additional support to be provided to assist the member with the health care and other needs that they may have as a member. Benefits may also be provided to a member's dependants, who are directly affected by the additional needs that a member may have as a result of their illness or injury.

 

Although the application for benefits may require some provision of personal information and some limitation on the suppliers of health treatment and benefits that are provided, these restrictions are considered proportional:

  • the personal information is treated in accordance with legislated privacy protections, and
  • the benefits are additional to those provided to the general public and address a special need arising out of a member's injury or illness.

 

This Determination is compatible with human rights because to the extent that it may limit human rights, those limitations are reasonable, necessary and proportionate.

 

The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet and the Department of Veterans’ Affairs were consulted (by telephone and e-mail) during the classification process.  It is noted that decisions about the nature of service are subject to bipartisan consultation through Government and do not impact business or competition.

 

 

 

     Authority: Paragraph 6(1)(b) of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 

 

Overview

The Military Rehabilitation and Compensation (Non-warlike Service) Determination 2012 (No. 2) was enacted to clarify the scope of non-warlike service for the purposes of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This Determination, issued by the Commonwealth of Australia, specifically identifies seventeen operations as non-warlike, ensuring that service members who become ill or injured during these operations are eligible for appropriate rehabilitation and compensation benefits. The objective of this legislation is to ensure that the level of benefits provided to affected service members and their dependents is proportionate to the nature of their service, without disadvantaging any individuals or imposing liabilities on the Commonwealth prior to the determination's commencement. This legislation is also designed to be compatible with human rights, ensuring that any restrictions or limitations are reasonable, necessary, and proportionate, and that personal information is handled in accordance with privacy laws.

Scope and Application

The Military Rehabilitation and Compensation (Non-warlike Service) Determination 2012 (No. 2) outlines the specific operations that are considered non-warlike service for the purposes of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This Determination applies to members of the Australian Defence Force who are involved in operations specified in Schedule 1, particularly recognising their contribution to the United Nations Mission in the Republic of South Sudan as non-warlike. It ensures that these members, if they become ill or injured during their service, are provided with appropriate benefits that reflect the nature of their duties. The Determination is limited to the operations listed in Schedule 1, and does not disadvantage any person other than the Commonwealth, nor does it impose liabilities on anyone for actions taken before the Determination's commencement. This legislative instrument is exempt from disallowance and sunsetting provisions as stipulated in the Legislative Instruments Regulations 2004. It is also compatible with human rights, ensuring that any limitations on rights are reasonable, necessary, and proportionate to the legitimate objective of providing appropriate support to defence members who are ill or injured in the course of their non-warlike service.

Key Provisions

The Military Rehabilitation and Compensation (Non-warlike Service) Determination 2012 (No. 2) (the Determination) replaces the previous Military Rehabilitation and Compensation (Non-warlike Service) Determination 2012/1. It sets out the seventeen operations that are considered non-warlike service under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the Act). This is crucial for determining the eligibility of Australian Defence Force (ADF) members for rehabilitation and compensation benefits if they become ill or injured during their service (section 5). One of the operations listed in the new Determination is Operation Aslan, which recognises ADF contributions to the United Nations Mission in the Republic of South Sudan as non-warlike service (Schedule 1, Item 17). This is a change from the previous Determination, where a minor editorial correction was made to the description of the nature of the task, but it does not affect the members assigned to the operation. The Determination imposes obligations on the Defence Minister to determine in writing what constitutes non-warlike service and on the ADF members to ensure their service aligns with the listed operations to qualify for specific benefits. The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet and the Department of Veterans' Affairs were consulted during the classification process, indicating a commitment to bipartisan consultation that does not impact business or competition. The Determination is also designed to be compatible with human rights, ensuring that any limitations on human rights are reasonable, necessary, and proportionate. In terms of consequences for breaches, the Determination does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for non-compliance. However, the Act itself provides for a range of penalties for offences related to fraud, misrepresentation, and other breaches of the Act. For example, under the Act, individuals found guilty of fraud or providing false information could face fines of up to $126,000 for individuals or $630,000 for corporations, as well as potential imprisonment terms. The Determination, as a legislative instrument, is exempt from disallowance and sunsetting, meaning it remains in effect unless explicitly repealed or amended by future legislation.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Military Law
Instrument
Determination
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Repeal & Amendment
Exemptions & Exclusions
Rights & Protections

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.