STATUTORY RULES.
1913. No. 49.
PROVISIONAL REGULATIONS UNDER THE DEFENCE ACT 1903-1912.
Amendments to C. M. Regulations 194 and 196.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby certify that, on account of urgency, the following Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1912 should come into immediate operation, and make the Regulations to come into operation forthwith as Provisional Regulations.
Dated this twenty-seventh day of February, One thousand nine hundred and thirteen.
DENMAN,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
E. A. ROBERTS.
REGULATIONS (PROVISIONAL) FOR THE MILITARY FORCES OF THE COMMONWEALTH.
Amendments.
At the end of Regulation 194 add the following:—
“In the Corps of Staff Cadets, the competent officer to authorize a discharge shall be—
(a) for breaches of discipline and moral unfitness | The Commandant, Royal Military College. |
(b) for other causes, The Minister for Defence,
and the competent officer to confirm all discharges shall be the Commandant, Royal Military College.
At the end of Regulation 196 (a) add the following:—
“Class XVIII.—In the case of a member of the Corps of Staff Cadets, in addition to the above, for the causes laid down in Royal Military College Regulations and Orders.”
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Acting Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.1967.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Provisional Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1912 were enacted in 1913 to address the urgent need for amendments to existing regulations governing military forces, specifically the Corps of Staff Cadets. This legislative instrument was made by the Governor-General in Council, acting on behalf of the Federal Executive Council, to ensure the provisions could be implemented with immediate effect. The amendments sought to clarify the authority and responsibilities of officers in relation to the discharge of cadets, with specific roles assigned to the Commandant of the Royal Military College and the Minister for Defence. The policy objective was to streamline the administrative processes within the military framework, ensuring that disciplinary and other discharges were managed effectively and in accordance with established regulations and orders.
The 1913 Statutory Rules, as a legislative instrument, aimed to fill a gap in the existing military governance structure by providing clear directives on the authorisation and confirmation of cadet discharges. This was achieved by specifying the roles of the Commandant and the Minister for Defence, thereby ensuring accountability and proper oversight. The urgency of these amendments underscores the importance of maintaining a well-regulated military force, capable of responding swiftly to internal disciplinary matters and other operational requirements.
Scope and Application
The Provisional Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1912, specifically Statutory Rules 1913 No. 49, are intended to amend existing regulations pertaining to the military forces of the Commonwealth. These regulations apply to the Corps of Staff Cadets, establishing specific officers responsible for authorising and confirming discharges. For breaches of discipline and moral unfitness, the Commandant of the Royal Military College is the competent officer to authorise a discharge, while any discharge must be confirmed by the Commandant. For other causes of discharge, the Minister for Defence is the authorised officer. The scope of these regulations is limited to the military forces, specifically affecting the Corps of Staff Cadets. These regulations extend to the entire Commonwealth, ensuring uniformity in the handling of discharges across all military training establishments. There are no stated exclusions or thresholds within the regulations themselves, but they operate under the overarching authority of the Defence Act 1903-1912 and can be further defined through subordinate instruments as necessary.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of these Provisional Regulations (C1913L00049) pertain to amendments to Regulations 194 and 196 under the Defence Act 1903-1912. Specifically, Regulation 194 is amended to designate the appropriate authorities for authorizing and confirming discharges from the Corps of Staff Cadets. Under this amendment, the Commandant of the Royal Military College is responsible for authorizing discharges for breaches of discipline and moral unfitness, while the Minister for Defence is responsible for other causes of discharge (Reg. 194). Furthermore, the Commandant must confirm all discharges from the Corps of Staff Cadets, regardless of the reason (Reg. 194). Regulation 196 is also amended to include a new Class XVIII, which specifies that in cases involving members of the Corps of Staff Cadets, the causes for discharge must be in accordance with Royal Military College Regulations and Orders, in addition to the existing provisions outlined in Regulation 196(a) (Reg. 196(a)).
The obligations and requirements imposed by these Provisional Regulations on the parties involved, particularly the authorities within the Corps of Staff Cadets, are clearly defined. The Commandant of the Royal Military College is tasked with the responsibility of authorizing and confirming discharges for breaches of discipline and moral unfitness, while also confirming all discharges, regardless of the reason (Reg. 194). The Minister for Defence, on the other hand, is responsible for authorizing discharges for causes other than breaches of discipline and moral unfitness (Reg. 194). Additionally, the Royal Military College Regulations and Orders must be adhered to in cases involving members of the Corps of Staff Cadets (Reg. 196(a)).
The Provisional Regulations do not explicitly outline any offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches. However, it can be inferred that failure to comply with the designated authorities and procedures for authorizing and confirming discharges from the Corps of Staff Cadets may result in legal consequences under the Defence Act 1903-1912 or other relevant legislation. The exact nature and severity of these consequences would depend on the specific circumstances of the breach and the applicable laws at the time. It is important to note that the lack of explicit penalties in these Provisional Regulations does not absolve parties from the potential legal ramifications of non-compliance.