STATUTORY RULES.
1913. No. 52.
PROVISIONAL REGULATIONS UNDER THE DEFENCE ACT 1903-1912.
Amendment to C.M. Regulation 421.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby certify that, on account of urgency, the following Regulation under the Defence Act 1903-1912, should come into immediate operation, and make the Regulation to come into operation forthwith as a Provisional Regulation.
Dated this fifth day of March, One thousand nine hundred and thirteen.
DENMAN,
Governor-General
By His Excellency’s Command,
G. F PEARCE.
REGULATIONS (PROVISIONAL) FOR THE MILITARY FORCES OF THE COMMONWEALTH.
Amendment.
At end of Regulation 421 add the following:—
“The evidence taken by the Court will be on oath,”
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.2743.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Provisional Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1912, enacted as Statutory Rules 1913 No. 52, address the urgent need to amend existing military regulations to enhance the procedural integrity of military courts. This legislative instrument was introduced by the Governor-General in Council, reflecting the pressing requirement to adjust military regulations swiftly due to the exigencies of the time. The amendment, specifically modifying Regulation 421, underscores a policy objective to ensure that the evidence presented in military courts is given on oath, thereby reinforcing the credibility and formality of military judicial processes. The legislation was issued under the Defence Act 1903-1912, highlighting the evolving nature of military law in response to operational and legal imperatives of the early 20th century.
Scope and Application
The Provisional Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1912, specifically amending Regulation 421, apply to the military forces of the Commonwealth of Australia and are intended to address urgent matters concerning military conduct and proceedings. This legislative instrument, issued under the authority of the Governor-General and certified as urgent, mandates that any evidence presented in a court under these regulations must be given on oath. The scope of this regulation is limited to the military context and pertains to the judicial processes within the military framework. The geographic reach of these regulations is national, applying across all states and territories within the Commonwealth. While the primary focus is on military forces, the regulation indirectly impacts military personnel and related entities by establishing a procedural requirement for evidence in military courts. This legislative instrument does not specify exclusions or exemptions but rather adds a specific procedural requirement to existing military regulations.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this Provisional Regulation pertain to the amendment of Regulation 421 under the Defence Act 1903-1912. Specifically, Regulation 421 is modified to include a new provision stating that "the evidence taken by the Court will be on oath" (C1913L00052). This amendment underscores the importance of sworn testimony in the proceedings of any court involved in military matters, ensuring that the evidence presented is truthful and under the penalty of perjury.
This Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved in military court proceedings. Firstly, it mandates that any evidence provided in court must be given under oath, thereby enhancing the credibility and reliability of the testimony (C1913L00052). This requirement ensures that the judicial process is upheld with the highest standards of honesty and integrity, which is crucial in military contexts where the consequences of false testimony can be severe.
Furthermore, the Act introduces specific consequences for any breaches of this regulation. While the Statutory Rules do not explicitly detail the penalties for not adhering to the oath requirement, it is reasonable to infer that failing to provide sworn testimony could lead to disciplinary action under military law. Such actions might include courts-martial, which could result in severe penalties such as fines, imprisonment, or other forms of punishment as deemed appropriate by the military tribunal. These measures are intended to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of military justice systems.