IMMI 08/119
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Migration Regulations 1994
CLASS OF PERSONS – PUBLIC INTEREST CRITERIA – REVOCATION OF RISK FACTOR LIST
(PARAGRAPH 4011(2)(b))
- This Instrument is made under paragraph 4011(2)(b) of the Migration Regulations 1994 (‘the Regulations’).
2. The purpose of the Instrument is to revoke Instrument Number IMMI 08/033, signed on 12 May 2008, specifying class of persons specified in a Gazette Notice must be subject to Public Interest Criteria – Risk Factor.
3. The ‘Risk Factor List’ has been criticised as an inflexible tool. In response to concerns raised in the Commonwealth Ombudsman’s Report The Safeguards System, the Gazette Notice made under paragraph 4011(2)(b) will be replaced by evidence based profiles maintained in the Safeguards system. These profiles will be updated regularly and assist departmental officers to make informed decision by providing relevant information about the social and political situation in the applicant’s home country and immigration non-compliance trends in the visitor visa caseload.
4. The Instrument, IMMI 08/119, commences on the 15 May 2009.
Overview
The Migration Regulations 1994, as amended by F2009L01316, aim to address the inadequacies identified in the previous risk assessment tool, particularly as highlighted in the Commonwealth Ombudsman’s Report titled "The Safeguards System." This instrument, which revokes the earlier Instrument IMMI 08/033 from 2008, seeks to enhance the decision-making process for visa applicants by replacing the rigid Risk Factor List with more dynamic, evidence-based profiles. These profiles, maintained within the Safeguards system, will be regularly updated to reflect the current social and political conditions in applicants' home countries, as well as trends in immigration compliance, thus enabling departmental officers to make more informed and nuanced decisions. The objective of this legislative change is to improve the effectiveness and fairness of the public interest criteria assessments in the migration process.
The enactment of this instrument by the relevant federal authority underscores a policy objective to streamline and modernise the assessment criteria for visa applications, ensuring they are based on the most current and relevant data. By transitioning from a static list to a dynamic system, the legislation seeks to provide a more balanced and responsive approach to assessing the public interest in visa applications. This change is expected to mitigate some of the criticisms previously directed at the rigidity of the Risk Factor List, thereby contributing to a more equitable and effective migration process.
Scope and Application
The Instrument IMMI 08/119 applies to individuals and entities involved in the assessment of visa applicants under the Migration Regulations 1994, specifically targeting those who are subject to the public interest criteria concerning risk factors. This instrument revokes the previous Instrument IMMI 08/033, which had designated specific classes of persons to be evaluated based on a static Risk Factor List. Instead, this new instrument introduces a more dynamic approach by shifting to evidence-based profiles that are maintained and updated within the Safeguards system. These profiles aim to provide more accurate and relevant information regarding the social and political conditions in the applicants' home countries, as well as trends in immigration non-compliance. The revocation and subsequent implementation are intended to enhance the decision-making process for departmental officers by providing them with better tools to assess the risk factors associated with visa applicants.
The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this instrument is inherently tied to the Commonwealth of Australia, as it pertains to the administration and regulation of migration under federal law. The instrument does not specify any exclusions or exemptions; however, it does indicate a shift from a list-based approach to a profile-based approach, which should be applied nationally. The instrument also does not specify any particular thresholds but rather focuses on the procedural changes in how risk factors are assessed. This change is designed to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the safeguards system, ensuring that decisions are made based on the most current and relevant information available.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of this Instrument, IMMI 08/119, pertain to the revocation of a previous Instrument, IMMI 08/033, which was signed on 12 May 2008 (section 2). This revocation was made under paragraph 4011(2)(b) of the Migration Regulations 1994. The main purpose of this Instrument is to address criticisms of the 'Risk Factor List' as an inflexible tool, replacing it with evidence-based profiles maintained in the Safeguards system (section 3). These profiles will be updated regularly and will assist departmental officers in making informed decisions by providing relevant information about the social and political situation in the applicant's home country and immigration non-compliance trends in the visitor visa caseload.
The Instrument imposes certain obligations on the parties it governs, primarily within the context of the Migration Regulations 1994. It requires the replacement of the 'Risk Factor List' with evidence-based profiles in the Safeguards system. These profiles must be updated regularly to ensure that they provide the most current information regarding the social and political situation in the applicant's home country, as well as immigration non-compliance trends in the visitor visa caseload. This is intended to assist departmental officers in making informed decisions when applying the Public Interest Criteria to visa applicants.
There are no specific offences, penalties, or consequences outlined in the Instrument itself. However, the broader context of the Migration Regulations 1994 may impose penalties or consequences for breaches of the regulations. For example, section 232 of the Migration Act 1958 outlines various penalties for non-compliance with the Act, including fines and imprisonment. The specific penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as any relevant mitigating or aggravating factors. It is important to note that the revocation of the 'Risk Factor List' and the introduction of evidence-based profiles is intended to improve the decision-making process, rather than to impose additional penalties on visa applicants.
Overall, the main focus of this Instrument is to address criticisms of the 'Risk Factor List' by replacing it with a more flexible and evidence-based approach to the Public Interest Criteria. By maintaining updated profiles in the Safeguards system, departmental officers will have access to the most relevant and current information when making decisions about visa applicants. While the Instrument itself does not outline specific penalties or consequences, it is essential to consider the broader context of the Migration Regulations 1994 when assessing potential breaches of the Act.