EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Migration Regulations 1994
SPECIFIED PLACE
(Paragraph 2.04(3)(b) and Subparagraph 2.08AC(4)(a)(ii))
- This Instrument is made under paragraph 2.04(3)(b) and subparagraph 2.08AC(4)(a)(ii) of the Migration Regulations 1994 (‘the Regulations’).
2. Paragraph 2.04(3)(b) provides that a personal identifier is to be provided at a place specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing. This relates to the provision of personal identifiers for the purposes of paragraph 40(3)(a) and subsection 40(5) of the Migration Act 1958 (‘the Act’) in relation to circumstances for granting visas.
3. Subparagraph 2.08AC(4)(a)(ii) provides that a personal identifier is to be provided at a place specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing. Paragraph 2.08AC(4) relates to the provision of personal identifiers for the purposes of subsection 46(2C) of the Act in relation to valid visa applications.
4. The purpose of the Instrument is to add the Australian Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia and visa application centres in Islamabad, Karachi and Lahore as specified places for biometrics collection and remove Syria as it is no longer practical to implement a biometrics collection centre in Syria for the foreseeable future.
5. The effect of the Instrument is to specify places in Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Lebanon, Kenya, Jordan, France, Pakistan, Ghana, Ethiopia and Cambodia where an applicant is to provide personal identifiers when required by an officer, for the purpose of assessing the validity of a visa application under subparagraph 2.08AC(4)(a)(ii) and for circumstances in which a visa may be granted under paragraph 2.04(3)(b).
6. Consultation was not necessary as, under subsection 18(1) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, the Instrument is of a minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.
7. Under section 44 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 the Instrument is exempt from disallowance and therefore a Human Rights Statement of Compatibility is not required.
8. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has advised that a Regulatory Impact Statement is not required (OBPR Reference 12114).
9. The Instrument, IMMI 12/098 commences on 6 December 2012.
Overview
The Migration Regulations 1994, as amended by the legislative instrument F2012L02219, were enacted to address the practicalities of collecting personal identifiers for visa applications, as required under the Migration Act 1958. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Government to provide clarity and ensure the smooth operation of visa processes by specifying where personal identifiers must be provided. The objective of this instrument is to update the list of specified places for biometrics collection, adding new locations such as the Australian Embassy in Phnom Penh and visa application centres in several cities, while removing Syria due to its impracticality for establishing a biometrics collection centre. This update was made under the authority of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, ensuring that the changes are of a minor nature and do not require extensive consultation or a Regulatory Impact Statement. The instrument came into effect on 6 December 2012.
Scope and Application
The Migration Regulations 1994, as specified in the Instrument F2012L02219, outline the locations where personal identifiers must be provided by applicants for the assessment of visa applications or the granting of visas. This legislation applies to individuals applying for visas, and it mandates the provision of personal identifiers at specific locations designated by the Minister in writing. These locations are intended to facilitate biometrics collection and are integral to the visa application process under the Migration Act 1958. The specified places, which include various embassies and visa application centres across multiple countries such as Cambodia, Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, and others, were chosen to streamline the collection of biometric data necessary for verifying the identity of applicants. Conversely, Syria has been removed as a specified location due to practical constraints. This regulatory approach ensures that visa applications are processed efficiently and securely by establishing clear protocols for biometrics collection, thereby enhancing the integrity of the visa application process.
Key Provisions
The Migration Regulations 1994, as amended by Instrument F2012L02219, introduce specific provisions regarding the collection of personal identifiers for visa applicants. According to paragraph 2.04(3)(b) of the Regulations, personal identifiers must be provided at locations designated by the Minister, which in this case, includes the Australian Embassy in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, and visa application centres in Islamabad, Karachi, and Lahore. This is intended to streamline the visa application process by ensuring that biometric data is collected at specified locations. Subparagraph 2.08AC(4)(a)(ii) of the Regulations similarly mandates that personal identifiers must be provided at locations specified by the Minister for the purposes of assessing visa applications.
The Regulations impose certain obligations on visa applicants, requiring them to provide personal identifiers at the designated locations. These obligations are intended to facilitate the verification of identities and the assessment of visa applications, ensuring that the process is both efficient and secure. The Regulations also remove Syria as a designated location for biometrics collection due to practical considerations, thereby reflecting the current geopolitical landscape and ensuring that the visa application process remains viable.
Failure to comply with the requirements set out in the Regulations may result in various consequences. Although specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the Explanatory Statement, it is reasonable to infer that non-compliance with the Regulations could lead to delays in visa processing or even the rejection of visa applications. The precise legal repercussions would likely be outlined in the primary legislation, the Migration Act 1958, or in other related regulations. The overarching intent of these provisions is to maintain the integrity of the visa application process by ensuring that all necessary data is collected in a standardised and secure manner.
The Regulations also specify that consultation was not necessary for this Instrument due to its minor nature, as per subsection 18(1) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Furthermore, the Instrument is exempt from disallowance under section 44 of the same Act, thereby bypassing the need for a Human Rights Statement of Compatibility. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has also determined that a Regulatory Impact Statement is not required for this Instrument, as indicated by OBPR Reference 12114. The Instrument, IMMI 12/098, became effective on 6 December 2012, marking the official commencement of the updated provisions.