EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Migration Regulations 1994
(Paragraphs 2.12C(5)(a) and 2.12C(5)(c))
VISAS ATTRACTING A SUBSEQUENT TEMPORARY APPLICATION CHARGE
- This Instrument is made under paragraphs 2.12C(5)(a) and 2.12C(5)(c) of the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations). It revokes Instrument IMMI 13/068, (F2013L01047), signed on 13 June 2013.
2. Paragraph 2.12C(5)(a) of the Regulations provides that the subsequent temporary application charge is payable by an applicant for a visa if the visa is specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing.
3. The purpose of the Instrument is to specify the visas that will be liable for the subsequent temporary application charge and also to specify the visas that are required to be held or to have been previously held so that the visa applicant is liable to pay the subsequent temporary application charge. The Instrument is being amended so that applicants who hold, or last held, a Student (Temporary)(Class TU) visa which they were required to apply for because an education provider was no longer able to provide a registered course to a student, will not have to pay a subsequent temporary application charge on their next onshore temporary visa application. The situation where an education provider is no longer able to provide a registered course is defined, at regulation 1.03 of the Regulations, as provider default. As a consequence of the amendment to this Instrument, students who hold, or have last held, a student visa because of provider default who re-apply for the following visa Subclasses: 401 Temporary Work (Long Stay Activity); 402 Training and Research (as specified in Schedule 1 to the Instrument); 416; Special Program; 420 Temporary Work (Entertainment); 457 Temporary Work (Skilled); 462 Work and Holiday (Temporary); 570 Independent ELICOS Sector; 571 Schools Sector; 572 Vocational Education and Training Sector; 573 Higher Education Sector; 574 Postgraduate Research Sector; 575 Non-Award Sector; 576 Foreign Affairs or Defence Sector; 580 Student Guardian; 600 Visitor; and 676 Tourist, will not have to pay a subsequent temporary application charge.
4. The Instrument operates to require holders of a visa who apply for a subsequent temporary visa to pay a subsequent temporary application charge when they lodge the
application in Australia.
5. Consultation with the Commonwealth Department of Education, the Tuition Protection Service and stakeholders within the Department was undertaken prior to the Instrument being amended.
6. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has advised that a Regulatory Impact Statement is not required (OBPR Reference 16795).
7. Under section 44 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 the Instrument is exempt from disallowance and therefore a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is not required.
8. The Instrument, IMMI 14/091 commences on 23 November 2014.
Overview
The Migration Regulations 1994, as amended by Instrument F2014L01335, address a specific gap in the application of the subsequent temporary application charge for certain visa applicants. Enacted by the Australian government, this legislation seeks to alleviate financial burdens on students who encounter provider default, where an education provider can no longer offer a registered course. The policy objective is to support students affected by such circumstances by exempting them from the subsequent temporary application charge when they apply for specific temporary visas. This amendment ensures that students who were compelled to apply for a Student (Temporary) visa due to provider default are not subjected to additional charges when re-applying for particular temporary visa subclasses, thus fostering a more equitable environment for affected students.
Scope and Application
The instrument specifies certain visas that attract a subsequent temporary application charge under the Migration Regulations 1994. It applies to applicants for a temporary visa who have previously held a Student (Temporary) visa and were required to apply for it due to provider default, defined as the inability of an education provider to offer a registered course. The instrument exempts these applicants from paying the subsequent temporary application charge when they apply for specific temporary visa subclasses. The scope of the instrument is national, affecting individuals across Australia who meet the specified criteria. Subordinate instruments may further extend or restrict its application, though no such instruments are mentioned in the text. The instrument exempts the specified applicants from the charge for the listed temporary visa subclasses, but applicants for other visa subclasses or those not meeting the specified criteria may still be liable for the charge.
Key Provisions
The Migration Regulations 1994, as amended by Instrument IMMI 14/091, specify that certain applicants for a visa will be liable for a subsequent temporary application charge (paragraphs 2.12C(5)(a) and 2.12C(5)(c)). This charge is payable when an applicant lodges an application for a temporary visa in Australia. The specific visas that attract this charge are those identified in the instrument. Importantly, the instrument has been revised to exempt students who hold, or have held, a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa due to provider default from paying the subsequent temporary application charge when they apply for certain other temporary visas. These include, but are not limited to, Subclasses 401, 402, 416, 420, 457, 462, 570, 571, 572, 573, 574, 575, 576, 580, 600, and 676. This amendment ensures that students affected by provider default do not incur additional costs when they seek to apply for other temporary visas.
Under the amended instrument, visa holders who apply for a subsequent temporary visa are required to pay the subsequent temporary application charge when they lodge the application in Australia. This requirement applies unless they fall under the exemption category mentioned above. The instrument outlines clearly which visas are subject to the charge and which are exempt, providing clarity and guidance to visa applicants. The instrument also details the process and the conditions under which the charge is applicable, ensuring that applicants are well-informed about their obligations.
Failure to comply with the provisions of this instrument may result in penalties or other consequences, although specific offences and penalties are not detailed within the instrument itself. However, it is generally understood that non-compliance with visa application requirements can lead to various civil or criminal consequences, including visa cancellations, deportation, and potential fines. The exact penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach. Furthermore, the instrument is exempt from disallowance under section 44 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, and a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is not required. The instrument came into effect on 23 November 2014, and consultation with relevant departments and stakeholders was undertaken before its amendment.