Migration Regulations 1994 - Specification of States and Territories with English Language Training Arrangements - IMMI 06/048

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2006L01865 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Migration Regulations 1994

 

STATES AND TERRITORIES WITH ENGLISH LANGUAGE TRAINING ARRANGEMENTS

(REGULATIONS 134.222C(2)(a), 139.226(b), 496.226(b), 863.226(b) AND 882.225(b))

 

  1. This Instrument is made under regulation 1.17 and various provisions of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (‘the Regulations’).

 

2.                  Section 1.17 of the Regulations provides that the Minister may, by notice published in the Gazette, specify matters required by individual provisions of the Regulations to be specified for the purposes of those provisions.

 

3.                  Subparagraphs 134.222C(2)(a), 139.226(b), 496.226(b), 863.226(b) and 882.225(b) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations provide that to be eligible for the grant of these General Skilled Migration (GSM) visas the applicant is not required to have vocational English if:

  • the applicant’s sponsor lives in a State or Territory specified by the Minister in a Gazette Notice as a State or Territory with suitable English language training arrangements;
  • the applicant has paid any fee or charge for that training; and
  • the applicant has a minimum level of English language skills.

 

4.                  The purpose of the Instrument is to specify the States and Territories with suitable English language training arrangements for the purposes of certain GSM visa subclasses, including the Skilled – Designated Area-sponsored (Provisional)(Class UZ) visa, introduced on 1 July 2006.

 

5.                  The Instrument operates to specify New South Wales, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory as States or Territories with suitable English language training arrangements.

 

7. Pursuant to section 18 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 consultation was not necessary.  The Instrument is of a minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.

 

8. The Instrument, IMMI 06/048, commences on 1 July 2006.

Overview

The Explanatory Statement outlines an instrument made under the Migration Regulations 1994, specifically addressing the eligibility criteria for General Skilled Migration (GSM) visas. Enacted to streamline the visa application process for skilled migrants, this instrument was introduced to address the gap in the requirement for vocational English proficiency for certain visa applicants. By specifying particular states and territories with suitable English language training arrangements, the instrument aims to facilitate the migration process for skilled workers who meet the necessary English language benchmarks. The enacting body is the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection, with the policy objective being to support the efficient processing of skilled migration applications by reducing unnecessary English language training requirements for applicants who already possess adequate English language skills. This instrument, IMMI 06/048, commenced on 1 July 2006, and identifies New South Wales, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, the Australian Capital Territory, and the Northern Territory as areas with suitable English language training arrangements.

Scope and Application

The Migration Regulations 1994, as detailed in F2006L01865, outline specific provisions for the General Skilled Migration (GSM) visas, notably affecting eligibility criteria for certain subclasses. These regulations are applicable to individuals seeking GSM visas and are particularly relevant to those sponsored by entities in specified states and territories. The key focus is on the exemption from vocational English language requirements for applicants whose sponsors reside in states or territories with suitable English language training arrangements, provided the applicants have met certain English proficiency thresholds and have paid applicable training fees. This regulation applies to New South Wales, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, the Australian Capital Territory, and the Northern Territory, as specified by the Minister through a Gazette Notice. The regulation does not require consultation as it is deemed minor and of a machinery nature, not significantly altering existing arrangements. The specified states and territories are recognised for having suitable English language training provisions, facilitating streamlined visa processing for skilled migrants in these regions.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Regulations) under this instrument are 134.222C(2)(a), 139.226(b), 496.226(b), 863.226(b) and 882.225(b) of Schedule 2. These sections specify that applicants for certain General Skilled Migration (GSM) visas are not required to have vocational English if they meet certain criteria, such as living in a state or territory specified by the Minister as having suitable English language training arrangements, having paid for that training, and possessing a minimum level of English language skills. Under the Regulations, the Minister for Immigration has the authority to specify the states and territories that have suitable English language training arrangements. This is done via a notice published in the Gazette. The current instrument specifies New South Wales, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, the Australian Capital Territory, and the Northern Territory as having such arrangements. The purpose of these provisions is to facilitate the grant of GSM visas to applicants who have been trained in English in these specified states and territories, thereby meeting the minimum English language skill requirements for visa eligibility. The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties governed by it include ensuring that applicants for GSM visas reside in a specified state or territory with suitable English language training arrangements, that they have paid for such training, and that they meet the required minimum level of English language skills. The onus is on the applicant to provide evidence of meeting these conditions to be eligible for the visa. Additionally, the Minister for Immigration is required to publish a notice in the Gazette specifying the states and territories with suitable English language training arrangements, ensuring transparency and clarity for applicants. The Act does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breach within the provided text. However, breaches of the Regulations or failure to meet the specified conditions for visa eligibility may lead to the refusal of a visa application. In cases where an applicant has provided false information or documentation, more severe consequences, including potential bans on future visa applications, may apply. It is important to note that while the explanatory statement does not detail maximum penalties, breaches of the Migration Act can result in significant civil and criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment, depending on the nature and severity of the breach.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Immigration & Refugee Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.