EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Migration Regulations 1994
CLASSES OF PERSONS
(Subparagraphs 1236(1)(a)(ii), 1236(1)(b)(ii) and 1236(1)(c)(ii))
- This Instrument is made under subparagraphs 1236(1)(a)(ii), 1236(1)(b)(ii) and 1236(1)(c)(ii) of the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
2. The Instrument revokes IMMI 14/060 (F2014L01035) signed on 23 July 2014.
3. The purpose of the Instrument is to allow the Minister to specify which classes of people are eligible to make an application via the internet for a Subclass 600 (Visitor) visa in the Tourist, Sponsored Family or Business Visitor stream.
4. The Instrument operates by specifying classes of persons who are eligible to make an application for a Subclass 600 (Visitor) visa via the internet on form 1419 (Internet). The Instrument has been amended to include additional countries and territories in Schedule 2, which provides online access to passport holders, who apply outside Australia for a Subclass 600 (Visitor) visa in the Tourist, Sponsored Family or Business Visitor stream. The countries and Territories added to Schedule 2 of the Instrument are: Bhutan, Burma, Cambodia, Laos, Mongolia, Pakistan and Thailand.
5. Persons who do not fall into a class specified in the Instrument are not able to lodge a valid application for a Subclass 600 (Visitor) visa on form 1419 (Internet).
6. Pursuant to subsection 18(1) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 consultation was not necessary. The Instrument is of a minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.
7. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has advised that a Regulatory Impact Statement is not required (OBPR Reference 16837 and 16861).
8. Under section 44 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 the Instrument is exempt from disallowance and therefore a Human Rights Statement of Compatibility is not required.
9. This Instrument, IMMI 14/105, commences on 23 November 2014.
Overview
The Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations) were enacted to manage and control the flow of people into and out of Australia, addressing the need for a systematic approach to immigration. In this context, the Explanatory Statement for F2014L01528, made under subparagraphs 1236(1)(a)(ii), 1236(1)(b)(ii) and 1236(1)(c)(ii) of the Regulations, serves to clarify and update the existing framework. Specifically, this Instrument aims to specify which classes of people are eligible to apply for a Subclass 600 (Visitor) visa online, thereby streamlining the application process for eligible applicants. This update revokes the previous IMMI 14/060 and incorporates additional countries and territories, including Bhutan, Burma, Cambodia, Laos, Mongolia, Pakistan, and Thailand, into the list of those eligible to apply via the internet. The Instrument is designed to enhance efficiency and accessibility in the visa application process for eligible visitors, while ensuring that those not meeting the specified criteria are unable to lodge an application using the online form 1419 (Internet).
Scope and Application
The instrument made under the Migration Regulations 1994 aims to specify the classes of people eligible to apply for a Subclass 600 (Visitor) visa online, namely in the Tourist, Sponsored Family or Business Visitor stream. It revokes the previous instrument IMMI 14/060 and expands the eligibility to include passport holders from Bhutan, Burma, Cambodia, Laos, Mongolia, Pakistan and Thailand. This regulation applies to individuals from these specified countries and territories who wish to apply for a visitor visa online. The regulation delineates a specific procedure for online applications using form 1419 (Internet), thus excluding those not falling into the specified classes from using this application method. The instrument operates under federal jurisdiction, as it is an amendment to the Migration Regulations, and does not require consultation, a Regulatory Impact Statement, or a Human Rights Statement of Compatibility as it is considered of minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Instrument, made under the Migration Regulations 1994, specify which classes of people are eligible to apply for a Subclass 600 (Visitor) visa via the internet (subsections 1236(1)(a)(ii), 1236(1)(b)(ii), and 1236(1)(c)(ii)). This revision revokes the previous Instrument IMMI 14/060 (F2014L01035) and introduces new classes of eligible applicants who can now apply online for the Tourist, Sponsored Family, or Business Visitor stream (section 3). The Instrument details that the eligible applicants include passport holders from specified countries and territories who apply outside Australia (section 4). The additional countries and territories now included in the eligibility criteria are Bhutan, Burma, Cambodia, Laos, Mongolia, Pakistan, and Thailand (section 5). It is important to note that those not listed in the Instrument cannot lodge a valid application for a Subclass 600 (Visitor) visa on form 1419 (Internet) (section 5).
The Instrument imposes specific obligations on the parties involved, primarily focusing on the eligibility of applicants from certain countries to apply for a Subclass 600 (Visitor) visa online. Eligible applicants must be passport holders from one of the specified countries or territories and must apply for their visa outside Australia. This requirement streamlines the application process for these specific groups, ensuring that they can efficiently apply for a Visitor visa online. Those who do not meet the criteria set out in the Instrument are ineligible to use the online form 1419 (Internet) for their visa applications.
Any breach of the requirements set forth in the Instrument may not explicitly state civil or criminal penalties within the text, but the general legislative framework under which the Regulations operate could imply consequences for non-compliance. Under the Migration Act 1958, unauthorised applications or misrepresentation of facts in visa applications can lead to significant penalties. These may include fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the breach. The specific maximum penalties would be outlined in the broader legislative context rather than this particular Instrument. It is crucial for applicants to ensure they meet all eligibility criteria and provide accurate information to avoid potential legal repercussions.