EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Migration Regulations 1994
CLASSES OF PERSONS
(Subparagraphs 1236(1)(a)(ii), 1236(1)(b)(ii) and 1236(1)(c)(ii))
- This Instrument is made under subparagraphs 1236(1)(a)(ii), 1236(1)(b)(ii) and 1236(1)(c)(ii) of the Migration Regulations 1994 (‘the Regulations’).
- Subparagraph 1236(1)(a)(ii) of the Regulations provides that, if internet applications are made for a subclass 600 (Visitor) visa in the Tourist stream, the applicant must be in a class of persons specified in an instrument in writing for the purposes of this subparagraph.
- Subparagraph 1236(1)(b)(ii) of the Regulations provides that if internet applications are made for a subclass 600 (Visitor) visa in the Sponsored Family stream, the applicant must be in a class of persons specified in an instrument in writing for the purposes of this subparagraph.
- Subparagraph 1236(1)(c)(ii) of the Regulations provides that if internet applications are made for a subclass 600 (Visitor) visa in the Business Visitor stream, the applicant must be in a class of persons specified in an instrument in writing for the purposes of this subparagraph.
- The purpose of the Instrument is to allow the Minister to specify which classes of people are eligible to make an application via the internet for a subclass 600 (Visitor) visa in the Tourist, Sponsored Family or Business visitor stream.
- The Instrument operates by specifying classes of persons who are eligible to make an application for a subclass 600 (Visitor) visa via the internet on form 1419 (Internet). Schedule 7 to this Instrument provides online access to passport holders of Nauru who apply outside Australia for a Subclass 600 (Visitor) visa in the Tourist, Sponsored Family or Business Visitor stream.
- Persons who do not fall into a class specified in the Instrument are not able to lodge a valid application for a subclass 600 (Visitor) visa on form 1419 (Internet).
- Pursuant to subsection 18(1) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 consultation was not necessary. The Instrument is of a minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.
- The Office of Best Practice Regulation has advised that a Regulatory Impact Statement is not required (OBPR Reference 15258).
- Under section 44 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 the Instrument is exempt from disallowance and therefore a Human Rights Statement of Compatibility is not required.
11. This Instrument, IMMI 13/103, commences on 20 September 2013.
Overview
The Migration Regulations 1994, as amended by the legislative instrument F2013L01699, was enacted to address a gap in the process of applying for a subclass 600 (Visitor) visa online. This regulation was introduced to streamline and specify the eligibility criteria for internet applications for the Tourist, Sponsored Family, and Business Visitor streams of the subclass 600 (Visitor) visa. The instrument was made under the authority of the Migration Regulations 1994 and aims to allow the Minister to specify the classes of persons eligible to apply for a visa online. This was achieved by detailing the classes of eligible applicants who can submit their visa applications via the internet using form 1419. The regulation was enacted by the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection and is considered a minor, machinery-related change that does not substantially alter existing arrangements, hence consultation and a Regulatory Impact Statement were deemed unnecessary. The instrument came into effect on 20 September 2013.
Scope and Application
The instrument F2013L01699, made under subparagraphs 1236(1)(a)(ii), 1236(1)(b)(ii) and 1236(1)(c)(ii) of the Migration Regulations 1994, specifies the classes of persons eligible to apply for a subclass 600 (Visitor) visa via the internet. This applies to individuals making applications for the Tourist, Sponsored Family, or Business Visitor streams of the subclass 600 visa. The regulation ensures that only those persons specified in the instrument, notably passport holders of Nauru applying outside Australia, can submit their applications online using form 1419 (Internet). Persons not meeting the specified criteria are ineligible to lodge their applications online. This instrument, IMMI 13/103, came into effect on 20 September 2013 and does not require consultation as it is of a minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements. Additionally, it is exempt from disallowance under section 44 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, and therefore, a Human Rights Statement of Compatibility is not required.
Key Provisions
The Migration Regulations 1994, specifically under subparagraphs 1236(1)(a)(ii), 1236(1)(b)(ii), and 1236(1)(c)(ii), establish the criteria for individuals eligible to apply online for a subclass 600 (Visitor) visa in the Tourist, Sponsored Family, or Business Visitor streams. These subparagraphs require that applicants belong to a class of persons specified in a written instrument. The primary purpose of this legislation is to delineate which classes of individuals are eligible to apply for a visitor visa via the internet. This is accomplished by specifying the categories of eligible applicants who can use form 1419 (Internet) for their applications. For instance, Schedule 7 of this Instrument provides online access to passport holders from Nauru who are applying outside Australia for a subclass 600 visa in any of the aforementioned streams.
The obligations under this Act require that applicants ensure they belong to one of the specified classes before proceeding with their visa applications. Those who do not fall within the specified classes cannot submit a valid application using the online form 1419 (Internet). This stipulation ensures that only eligible applicants can apply online, thereby maintaining the integrity and efficiency of the visa application process. The regulations also mandate that the Minister specifies the eligible classes of applicants in a written instrument, thereby providing clarity and legal basis for the application process.
In terms of enforcement, breaches of these provisions could lead to invalid applications, which may result in delays, additional scrutiny, or even rejection of the visa application. While the specific penalties for such breaches are not detailed in the provided text, it is implicit that failure to comply with the eligibility criteria set forth by the Minister could have significant implications for the applicant, potentially including the need to reapply through alternative means or face additional administrative hurdles. The legislative framework ensures that the application process adheres strictly to the specified eligibility criteria, maintaining the regulatory standards set forth by the Migration Regulations 1994.