EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Migration Regulations 1994
CLASS OF PERSONS 2015
(Subclause 186.234(3) and Sub-subparagraph 5.19(4)(h)(ii)(D))
- This Instrument is made under subclause 186.234(3) and sub-subparagraph 5.19(4)(h)(ii)(D) of the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
2. The purpose of the Instrument is to update the occupations listed as eligible occupations for the purposes of sub-subparagraph 5.19(4)(h)(ii)(D).
3. The Instrument operates to specify a class of persons who are exempt from satisfying the primary criteria in relation to skills for the relevant occupation at the time of application for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme (ENS)) visa in the Direct Entry stream;
4. The Department did not undertake specific consultation in regards to the eligible occupations change as it impacts on one occupation only.
5. The Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR) has advised that a Regulatory Impact Statement is not required (OBPR Reference 17847).
6. Under section 44 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 the Instrument is exempt from disallowance and therefore a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is not required.
7. The Instrument has a retrospective commencement to enhance opportunities for a visa applicant to apply for skilled occupations and does not disadvantage the rights of a person as prescribed in subsection 12(2) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
8. The Instrument, IMMI 15/109, commences on 1 July 2015.
Overview
The Migration Regulations 1994, as amended by the Legislation F2015L01148, address the need to update the list of eligible occupations for skilled migration under the Employer Nomination Scheme (ENS). This particular amendment, made in 2015, aims to modernise and refine the eligibility criteria for applicants seeking a Subclass 186 visa, which is part of the Direct Entry stream. The update was necessary to reflect changes in the occupational landscape and to ensure that the scheme continues to attract skilled workers who meet current workforce demands. Enacted by the Australian Government, the policy objective is to provide a streamlined process for skilled migrants to apply for permanent residency by aligning the eligible occupations with contemporary industry needs. This change does not require specific consultation or a Regulatory Impact Statement as it impacts only a single occupation, and it has been designed to enhance opportunities for applicants without disadvantaging existing rights.
Scope and Application
The Migration Regulations 1994 (Class of Persons) 2015 applies to individuals applying for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa in the Direct Entry stream. Specifically, it exempts a class of persons from meeting the primary skills criteria for a single specified occupation at the time of application. This legislation is a direct extension of subclause 186.234(3) and sub-subparagraph 5.19(4)(h)(ii)(D) of the Migration Regulations 1994, designed to update the list of occupations eligible for the exemption. The Instrument does not require consultation, a Regulatory Impact Statement, or a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights, as advised by the Office of Best Practice Regulation. It has a retrospective commencement date of 1 July 2015, ensuring it enhances opportunities for skilled occupation visa applications without disadvantaging existing rights.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this Instrument (F2015L01148) are those that specify the class of persons exempt from satisfying the primary criteria in relation to skills for the relevant occupation at the time of application for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme (ENS)) visa in the Direct Entry stream (Subclause 186.234(3) and Sub-subparagraph 5.19(4)(h)(ii)(D)). These sections serve to update the occupations listed as eligible for this visa category, thereby potentially enhancing the opportunities for applicants in specific skilled occupations.
This Act imposes obligations on the Department to ensure that the updated list of eligible occupations is accurately reflected and that the criteria for exemption are properly applied. Furthermore, it mandates that the Department does not undertake specific consultation for changes impacting a single occupation, as specified in the Instrument. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has advised that a Regulatory Impact Statement is not required for this change, and as such, the Instrument is exempt from disallowance and does not require a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights.
In terms of potential breaches, the Act does not explicitly state any specific offences, penalties, or consequences for non-compliance. However, any failure to accurately implement or enforce the provisions of this Instrument could potentially lead to legal challenges or administrative reviews by affected parties, although these are not explicitly defined within the text. The retrospective commencement of the Instrument on 1 July 2015 ensures that it does not disadvantage the rights of individuals as prescribed in subsection 12(2) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, thus safeguarding against any retrospective penalties for those who may have applied under the previous criteria.