Migration Regulations 1994 - Specification of Alternative English Language Proficiency Tests to the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) - IMMI 06/070

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2007L00297 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Migration Regulations 1994

 

ALTERNATIVE ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY TESTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH LANGUAGE TESTING SYSTEM (IELTS)

(REGULATION 5A102)

 

  1. This Instrument is made under regulation 1.17 and clause 5A102 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (‘the Regulations’).

 

2.      Regulation 1.17 of the Regulations provides that the Minister may, by notice published in the Gazette, specify matters required by individual provisions of the Regulations to be specified for the purposes of those provisions.

 

3.      Clause 5A102 of the Regulations provides that the Minister may specify in a Gazette Notice an English language proficiency test as an alternative to the IELTS test, the foreign country or countries in which that test may be taken by an applicant, and the test score that must be achieved by the applicant for this clause.

 

4.      The purpose of the Instrument is to specify which English language proficiency tests may be used as an alternative to the IELTS test, in which countries, and the scores that must be achieved by an applicant.

 

5.      In 14 countries where IELTS testing is not available, a satisfactory result in a Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) test is accepted.  While to date there have been two versions of TOEFL available - the Paper-Based test and the Computer-Based test, the new internet Based TOEFL (iBT) is gradually replacing the former versions and it has become necessary to amend the current Gazette Notice to include the iBT and corresponding acceptable scores.

 

6.      Pursuant to section 18 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 consultation was not necessary.  The Instrument is of a minor or machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.

 

 

7.      The Instrument, IMMI 06/070, commences on the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

 

Overview

The Migration Regulations 1994, amended by Instrument F2007L00297, were introduced to address the need for alternative English language proficiency tests in regions where the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) is not available. This legislative amendment allows the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection to specify alternative tests and corresponding scores required by applicants. Specifically, the regulation addresses the inclusion of the internet-based Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) as an acceptable alternative to IELTS in countries where TOEFL is available but IELTS is not. The policy objective is to ensure that the English language proficiency requirements of the Migration Regulations are met uniformly across different testing environments, facilitating a fair and consistent application process for prospective migrants. This Instrument was enacted without the need for consultation, as it is considered minor and of a machinery nature, not substantially altering existing arrangements.

Scope and Application

The Migration Regulations 1994, as amended by the Instrument IMMI 06/070, apply to individuals seeking to migrate to Australia and require them to demonstrate their English language proficiency. Specifically, this instrument pertains to those applying in countries where the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) is not available, allowing them to use alternative tests such as the internet-based Test of English as a Foreign Language (iBT) in lieu of the IELTS. The regulation specifies the countries where these alternative tests can be taken and the minimum scores required for acceptance. This instrument updates the existing Gazette Notice to include the iBT and its corresponding acceptable scores, ensuring that the testing process remains current and relevant. The changes introduced by this instrument do not require consultation under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 as they are considered minor and of a machinery nature. The commencement of the Instrument is effective from the day it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

Key Provisions

The primary operative sections of the Migration Regulations 1994, as amended by IMMI 06/070, introduce specific alternative English language proficiency tests to the International English Language Testing System (IELTS) (regulation 5A102 (1)). This regulation allows the Minister to specify in a Gazette Notice an alternative English language proficiency test, the countries in which the test may be taken, and the required test scores. For instance, the TOEFL internet-based test (iBT) is now recognised as an alternative in 14 countries where IELTS is not available, with specific scores needed to meet the migration requirements (regulation 5A102 (2)). This ensures that applicants have a recognised alternative to IELTS where it is not accessible. The Act imposes specific obligations on applicants seeking to migrate to Australia under certain visa categories. They must achieve the specified scores in the alternative English language proficiency tests as outlined in the Gazette Notice. For example, an applicant must achieve a specific score in the TOEFL iBT if they are applying from a country where IELTS is unavailable (regulation 5A102 (2)). These requirements are designed to ensure that applicants meet the necessary English language standards to integrate effectively into Australian society and the workforce. Breaching the requirements set forth in the Regulations can result in serious consequences for applicants. If an applicant fails to achieve the required scores in the specified English language proficiency tests, their visa application may be refused or processed under conditions that could hinder their ability to migrate or remain in Australia. Additionally, repeated or deliberate non-compliance may lead to further actions, including potential visa cancellations or deportation for those already in Australia (regulation 5A102 (3)). The specific penalties for such breaches are not detailed in the Explanatory Statement, but generally, they can include financial penalties, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the breach and other jurisdictional factors.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Immigration & Refugee Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.