EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Migration Regulations 1994
INSTITUTIONS AND DISCIPLINES FOR SUBCLASS 476
(SKILLED – RECOGNISED GRADUATE) VISAS
(Clause 476.212)
- This Instrument is made under clause 476.212 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (‘the Regulations’).
2. Clause 476.212 of the Regulations provides that the applicant must have (a) completed a course in the period of 24 months ending immediately before the day on which the application is made; and (b) at an institution specified by the Minister in an instrument in writing for the paragraph, for the award of a degree or higher qualification in a discipline specified in an instrument in writing for the clause.
3. The purpose of the Instrument is to increase numbers of graduate engineers working in Australia and address the current skills shortage in this occupation. The Instrument specifies that applicants for a subclass 476 visa must have completed their engineering degree at a Recognised Institution under the Washington Accord as specified in the Instrument.
4. The Instrument operates to specify institutions whose names are published on the website of an accrediting body that is a signatory to the Washington Accord and courses, which are accredited by that accrediting body, for the purposes of paragraph 476.212(b).
5. The Canadian High Commission made representations to the department before the Instrument was made. Once the Instrument is confirmed as taking effect on
14 February 2014, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade and Engineers Australia will be advised of the change.
6. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has advised that a Regulation Impact Statement is not required (OBPR Reference 16387).
7. Under section 44 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 the Instrument is exempt from disallowance and therefore a Human Rights Statement of Compatibility is not required.
8. The instrument commences on 14 February 2014.
Overview
The Migration Regulations 1994 were amended by the instrument F2014L00130 to address the shortage of skilled engineers in Australia, particularly those who have completed their degrees at institutions recognised under the Washington Accord. The problem this legislation sought to tackle was the underrepresentation of qualified engineering graduates in the Australian workforce, which was impacting various sectors requiring technical expertise. Enacted by the relevant legislature, this instrument specifies that applicants for a subclass 476 visa must have completed their engineering degree at an institution accredited by an accrediting body that is a signatory to the Washington Accord. The policy objective of this instrument is to enhance the number of skilled engineers working in Australia by ensuring that only those who have studied at recognised institutions are eligible for the subclass 476 visa. This approach is designed to maintain high standards in the engineering profession and to bolster the skills base within the country.
Scope and Application
The Migration Regulations 1994, specifically Clause 476.212, pertain to the eligibility criteria for applicants seeking a subclass 476 (Skilled – Recognised Graduate) visa. This legislation applies to individuals who have completed a degree or higher qualification in a specified discipline from an institution recognised under the Washington Accord, within the 24 months preceding the visa application. These applicants must have completed their studies at institutions whose names appear on the website of an accrediting body that is a signatory to the Washington Accord and whose courses are accredited by that body. The act aims to address the shortage of skilled engineers in Australia by increasing the number of graduate engineers working in the country. The Instrument, which specifies the eligible institutions and disciplines, is exempt from disallowance under section 44 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, and thus, a Human Rights Statement of Compatibility is not required. The commencement date for this Instrument is 14 February 2014, and it operates to provide clarity and specificity to the criteria outlined in Clause 476.212 of the Migration Regulations 1994.
Key Provisions
The Migration Regulations 1994, specifically Clause 476.212, sets out the primary requirements for applicants seeking a subclass 476 (Skilled – Recognised Graduate) visa (Clause 476.212). To be eligible, applicants must have completed a course within the 24 months preceding their application (Clause 476.212(a)), and the course must have been at an institution recognised by the Minister and must have led to the award of a degree or higher qualification in a specific discipline also recognised by the Minister (Clause 476.212(b)). This clause aims to increase the number of skilled graduates, particularly engineers, to address current skills shortages in Australia. The Instrument specifies that the recognised institutions must be part of the Washington Accord, and the courses must be accredited by the respective accrediting bodies.
These regulations impose certain obligations on the parties involved. The Minister must specify which institutions and disciplines qualify under Clause 476.212, and these specifications are published on the website of the relevant accrediting body. Institutions must ensure their courses are accredited by the appropriate body, and applicants must verify that their courses meet the stipulated criteria. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, along with Engineers Australia, will be notified once the Instrument takes effect, ensuring that all relevant parties are aware of the changes.
Breach of these provisions can lead to various consequences. While the explanatory statement does not explicitly detail penalties for non-compliance, it is reasonable to infer that any failure to meet the requirements for a subclass 476 visa could result in the application being refused or the visa being cancelled if already granted. The Migration Act 1958, under which these Regulations operate, provides for various penalties, including fines and imprisonment, for breaches related to visa applications and conditions. The exact penalties would depend on the specific nature and severity of the breach, as well as other relevant factors under the Act.