Migration Amendment Regulations 2000 (No. 3)

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2000B00116 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Migration Amendment Regulations 2000 (No. 3) 2000 No. 108

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

STATUTORY RULES 2000 NO. 108

Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

Migration Act 1958

Migration Amendment Regulations 2000 (No.3)

Subsection 504(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act) provides for the

Governor-General to make regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, prescribing all matters which by the Act are required or permitted to be prescribed, or which are necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.

In addition, regulations may be made pursuant to the following powers under the Act:

section 31 provides that the regulations are to prescribe classes of visas, and may prescribe criteria for visas of a specified class; and

subsection 504(3) authorises the making of regulations in relation to the deemed receipt of documents.

The purpose of the Regulations is to amend the Migration Regulations 1994 to:

-       put beyond doubt that an applicant may be granted a Subclass 866 (Protection) visa where the applicant satisfies the other relevant criteria for the grant of the visa and either:

*       the applicant, or a member of the family unit of the applicant, has not been offered a temporary stay in Australia by the Australian Government for the purposes of regulation 2.07AC (temporary safe haven visas); or

*       section 9 1 K of the Act does not apply to the applicant's application because the Minister has made a determination in respect of their application under section 9 1 L of the Act (Schedule 1); and

-       overcome problems with regulation 5.03 concerning receipt of documents and deemed receipt times identified by the majority judgment of the Full Federal Court in MIMA v Harinder Pal Singh [20001 FCA 377. The Court held that regulation 5.03 could operate effectively to remove the rig review provided by the Act. The proposed amendment will, in most circumstances, increase the period of time between actual notification of a decision and the expiry of the period for lodging a review application (Schedule 2).

Details of the Regulations are set out in the Attachment.

Regulations 1, 2 and 3, and Schedule 1 of the Regulations are taken to have commenced on 28 April 2000. The retrospectivity of the amendments is not prejudicial to any person and does not therefore contravenes subsection 48(2) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. The amendments in Schedule commence on 1 July 2000.

ATTACHMENT

Regulation 1 - Name of Regulations

This regulation provides that these Regulations are the Migration Amendment Regulations 2000 (No.3)

Regulation 2 - Commencement

This regulation provides that these Regulations commence, or are taken to have commenced, as follows:

on 28 April 2000 - regulations 1, 2 and 3, and Schedule 1; and on 1 July 2000 - Schedule 2.

Regulation 3 - Amendment of Migration Regulations 1994

This regulation provides that Schedules 1 and 2 to these Regulations amend the

Migration Regulations 1994.

Schedule 1 - Amendment taken to have commenced on 28 April 2000

Item 1 - Schedule 1, clauses 866.227 and 866.227A

This item replaces clauses 866.227 and 866.227A with new clause 866.227.

The amendment puts beyond doubt that an applicant may be granted a Subclass 866 (Protection) visa where the applicant satisfies the other relevant criteria for the grant of the visa and either:

the applicant, or a member of the family unit of the applicant, has not been offered a temporary stay in Australia by the Australian Government for the purposes of regulation 2.07AC; or

section 91 K of the Act does not apply to the applicant's application because the Minister has made a determination in respect of their application under section 9 1 L of the Act.

The amendment will be of particular significance to those applicants who have been offered (or whose family unit members have been offered a temporary stay in Australia by the Australian Government for the purposes of regulation 2.07AC, which governs applications for temporary safe haven visas.

Schedule 2 - Amendment commencing on 1 July 2000

Item 1 - Subregulation 5.03(2),

This item amends subregulation 5.03(2) so that, for the purposes of the deemed

receipt of documents, a document must be sent within three days of the date of the

document, not seven days as previously required.

 

Overview

The Migration Amendment Regulations 2000 (No. 3) were enacted to amend the Migration Regulations 1994, ensuring clarity in the process of granting Subclass 866 (Protection) visas and rectifying issues identified in the Federal Court’s judgment in MIMA v Harinder Pal Singh. Authorised by the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs and issued under the Migration Act 1958, the primary objective of these regulations is to clarify the eligibility criteria for Subclass 866 visas, ensuring applicants are granted visas if they meet the necessary conditions, specifically regarding temporary safe haven offers and Minister's determinations. Additionally, the regulations address the Full Federal Court's concerns regarding the deemed receipt of documents, adjusting the timeframe for document receipt to enhance the review process for applicants. The retrospective amendments to the regulations are deemed non-prejudicial, thereby complying with the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.

Scope and Application

The Migration Amendment Regulations 2000 (No. 3) amends the Migration Regulations 1994 to refine the criteria and processes for the granting of Subclass 866 (Protection) visas and to address issues with the deemed receipt of documents. These Regulations apply to applicants for Subclass 866 visas and other affected parties who are subject to the Migration Act 1958 and its subordinate instruments. The geographic reach of these Regulations is national, as they pertain to the administration of migration within Australia. The Regulations provide clarity on the eligibility criteria for Subclass 866 visas, ensuring that applicants who have not been offered a temporary stay in Australia by the Australian Government for the purposes of regulation 2.07AC or who have had their application determination under section 91L of the Act may still be considered for a protection visa. Additionally, the Regulations amend the deemed receipt of documents to ensure that a document must be sent within three days of its date, thereby increasing the period available for applicants to lodge a review application. The Regulations are divided into two schedules, with certain amendments taken to have commenced on 28 April 2000, and others effective from 1 July 2000.

Key Provisions

The Migration Amendment Regulations 2000 (No. 3) primarily amend the Migration Regulations 1994 to address certain issues surrounding the grant of Subclass 866 (Protection) visas and the deemed receipt of documents. Regulation 1 names these regulations as the Migration Amendment Regulations 2000 (No. 3). Regulation 2 specifies the commencement dates, with regulations 1, 2, 3, and Schedule 1 effective from 28 April 2000, and Schedule 2 effective from 1 July 2000. Regulation 3 indicates that the schedules to these regulations amend the Migration Regulations 1994. These regulations impose specific obligations and requirements on applicants for Subclass 866 (Protection) visas. Firstly, they clarify that applicants may be granted such a visa if they satisfy the relevant criteria and either have not been offered a temporary stay in Australia under regulation 2.07AC, or section 91 K of the Act does not apply to their application because a determination has been made by the Minister under section 91 L of the Act. Secondly, they amend subregulation 5.03(2) to ensure that documents must be sent within three days, rather than seven, for the purposes of deemed receipt. This change aims to overcome issues identified by the Full Federal Court in MIMA v Harinder Pal Singh [2000] FCA 377, where the court found that the previous regulation could effectively remove the right to review provided by the Act. The regulations also outline potential consequences for non-compliance. Although specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the provided text, it is understood that breaches of migration regulations can result in significant legal repercussions. Typically, breaches of the Migration Act 1958 may lead to civil or criminal penalties, including fines and imprisonment, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. For instance, knowingly making a false or misleading statement in a visa application can result in a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment or fines up to 180,000 penalty units, whichever is the greater. Additionally, failure to comply with deemed receipt times and other procedural requirements may lead to visa cancellations or deportation orders for those already holding a visa.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Immigration & Refugee Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.