Migration Act 1958 - Direction under section 499 - Order for Consideration or Disposal of Applications for Visas under section 91 of the Migration Act 1958 (Direction No. 27 of 2001)

Administered by Department of Home Affairs

Legislation au F2006B11716 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

DIRECTION NO. 27

 

MIGRATION ACT 1958

DIRECTION UNDER SECTION 499

 

Order for Consideration or Disposal of Applications for Visas under Section 91 of the Migration Act 1958

 

WHEREAS:

Section 91 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act) empowers the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, if a section 85 determination (of the maximum number of visas that may be granted in a financial year) applies or has applied, to consider or, subject to section 86, dispose of outstanding and further applications for visas in such order as he or she considers appropriate.

Section 86 provides that if there is a section 85 determination for a visa class or classes (i.e. a cap) and the number of visas of the class or classes granted in the financial year reached that maximum number, no more visas of the class or classes may be granted in the financial year.

Sections 87, 87A and 88 affect the operation of section 86 as follows:

  •                  Section 87 provides that section 86 does not prevent the grant of a visa to a person who applied for it on the ground that he or she is the spouse, or dependent child of an Australian citizen or permanent resident or a person who is usually resident in Australia and whose continued presence in
    Australia is not subject to a limitation as to time imposed by law;
  •                  Section 87A provides that section 86 does not prevent the grant of a visa to a person where:

- that person has been affected by section 86 in a previous financial year,

- that person has subsequently been requested to meet health or character requirements,

- that person has met those requirements but not before section 86 has again taken effect, and

- the Minister is satisfied that the person was unable to satisfy the health or character requirements before the operation of section 86 for a second time because of circumstances beyond the person's control;

 

  •                  Section 88 provides that section 86's prevention of a visa grant does not prevent any other action related to the application for it.

 

Each year the Government sets planning levels for the various categories of the Migration Program. The Minister's power under section 85 of the Act to limit the number of visas that may be granted in particular classes or subclasses may be used to ensure that planning levels are not exceeded and that the Program is delivered in line with the overall size and composition set by Government.

High levels of demand in some classes where places under the Migration Program are limited have created a need for managing the grant of visas in these classes in an orderly and equitable fashion. This is particularly the case in classes where there are numbers of applicants who have been affected by section 86 of the Act in a previous Program year.

Decision-makers having powers under the Act to consider visa applications have powers under section 91 to consider and dispose of applications for visas in such order as they consider appropriate. This Direction provides guidance on the order of consideration or disposal of applications for which there has been a section 85 determination (ie. a cap) under section 91 of the Act. There is a separate Direction under section 51 of the Act, which provides guidance on the order of consideration of applications under the Family Stream.

It is the Government’s view that in considering or disposing of applications under section 91 of the Act, the highest level of priority should be given to those applications where I exercise my powers of intervention under sections 345, 351 and 417 of the Act and applications made by persons on the grounds of being an orphan relative. It is the Government’s intention that these applications should not be placed in a queue or assigned a queue date, and consideration should be given to processing these cases ahead of other applications which have been assigned a queue date (as discussed below).

In relation to all other applications, it is the Government’s intention that these applications should be placed in a queue and given a queue date. The  “queue date” is an administrative mechanism established by the Government in order to establish a chronological order for applications within the queue. The queue date is usually the date on which an applicant met the last of the criteria prescribed for the relevant subclass of visa, with limited exceptions. It is recorded in relevant departmental systems and applicants are advised of the date assigned to their application.

It is the Government’s view that in considering or disposing of applications under section 91 of the Act, consideration be given to processing applications in accordance with their queue date. That is, applications with earlier queue dates should be processed before applications with later queue dates. However, in assigning queue dates, due regard should also be given to the order of priority for certain applications as set out below.

 

It is the Government’s view that a high priority in assigning queue dates be given to cases that are remitted following successful review applications through the merits review tribunals and or the courts.

In respect of those review cases that reach the stage where they can be granted a queue date in a class or subclass in which a cap is in place, consideration should be given to assigning them the most advantageous queue date available at the time all relevant requirements are met.

However, where the use of the most advantageous queue date available would result in such a date preceding the date of the primary decision to refuse the application, consideration should be given to using the date of the primary decision as the assigned queue date.

The next order of priority in assigning the next most advantageous queue date available at the time all relevant requirements are met should then be given to applications made by persons on the grounds of being a carer or special need relative (prior to 1 December 1998 the equivalent of the carer ground was the special need relative ground).

Subsection 499(1) of the Act empowers the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs to give to a person or body having functions or powers under the Act written directions not inconsistent with the Act or regulations, in accordance with which the person or body shall perform those functions and exercise those powers.

NOW:

I, Philip Ruddock, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, acting under section 499 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act), revoke Direction No. 24, given on 9 May 2001, and give the following direction:

1.      This Direction may be cited as Direction No. 27.

2.      This Direction is made with respect to the exercise of the power under section 91 of the Act to consider and dispose of applications that are affected by sections 85 and 86 of the Act.

3.      In considering the exercise of the power under section 91 of the Act, decision-makers are to have due regard to the objects and purposes of the Government's policy intentions in relation to the size and composition of the Migration (non-Humanitarian) Program.

4.      It is the Government’s view that, in considering the order for considering or disposing of applications under section 91 of the Act, persons or bodies having powers under the Act should have due regard to the following order of precedence:

  •                  those applications where I exercise my powers of intervention under sections 345, 351 and 417 of the Act; and

 

  •                  those applications made by persons on the grounds of being an orphan relative. These applications should be outside the queue process; then
  •                  all other applications in queue date order. That is, those applications with earlier queue dates should be considered before those applications with later queue dates.

5.      Due regard should be given to the Government’s view that those applications which should be placed in a queue, should be assigned a queue date. The queue date is usually the date on which the applicant meets the last of the criteria prescribed for the relevant subclass of visa, with the following exceptions:

  • Preferential/Other Family applicants – payment of the Assurance of Support bond and the second instalment of the Visa Application Charge or the Migrant Health Services Charge where these apply; and 
  • Parents – Assurance of Support requirements and payment of the second instalment of the Visa Application Charge or the Migrant Health Services Charge.

6.      It is the Government’s view that in assigning queue dates, due consideration should be given to placing certain applicants in the queue in line with the procedures outlined in the preamble to this Direction, and reflecting the following order of priority:

  •                  cases remitted following review from a merits review tribunal or the courts;
  •                  Carers or special need relatives (prior to 1 December 1998 the equivalent of the carer ground was the special need relative ground);
  •                  all other cases in chronological order.

7.      In considering or disposing of applications under s.91 of the Act, it may  be necessary for decision makers to request applicants to meet certain outstanding requirements set out in Schedule 2 of the Regulations. These may include:

  •                  lodgement of the Assurance of Support bond;
  •                  payment of the Migrant Health Services Charge or second instalment of the Visa Application Charge;
  •                  health or character clearances where these have expired;
  •                  other requirements (eg sponsorship renewal) in some cases.

8.            Assessments of these outstanding requirements will generally be undertaken in a context where there are high levels of demand for a finite number of visa places and a further determination under section 85 has been or will be made. The order of precedence outlined in paragraph 4 should not be held to guarantee a decision to grant a visa to a particular applicant. Notwithstanding this order of precedence, it is the Government's view that, orderly management of the Program requires that the reaching of a cap (ie the reaching of the number of visa grants specified in a section 85 Determination) should not be unduly deferred due to individual applicants being unable to meet particular requirements.

9.      In this context decision-makers should, subject to the Act and regulations, therefore have due regard to advising applicants who are asked to meet additional requirements concerning:

  •                  an appropriate time frame within which certain steps should be undertaken having regard to the likelihood that a section 85 cap will come into effect within a certain broad time frame;
  •                  the possible consequences of their inability to meet requirements within that time frame - notably that they may again be affected by section 86 of the Act.

 

 

Dated this 31st day of December 2001

 

 

 

Philip Ruddock

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs

Overview

The Migration Act 1958, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, aims to regulate the migration of people into and out of Australia and to manage the immigration program in an orderly and equitable manner. One of the key mechanisms for managing the immigration program is the imposition of caps on the number of visas that can be granted in certain classes or subclasses, as provided for in sections 85 and 86 of the Act. Section 91 of the Act empowers the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs to consider or dispose of outstanding and further applications for visas in an order deemed appropriate when a cap applies. Direction No. 27, issued under section 499 of the Act, provides guidance on the order of consideration or disposal of visa applications affected by a cap, ensuring that the immigration program is managed in a manner that aligns with government policy objectives. The Direction prioritises certain applications for consideration, such as those involving intervention powers and orphan relatives, while also establishing a queue date system for other applications to ensure orderly processing. The policy objective is to manage the visa grant process in a manner that respects the established caps and maintains the integrity of the immigration program.

Scope and Application

The Direction No. 27 under the Migration Act 1958, issued by the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, outlines the order in which visa applications are to be considered or disposed of when a cap on the number of visas that may be granted in a financial year, as determined under section 85, has been reached. The Act applies to decision-makers exercising powers under the Act, particularly those considering visa applications, and it is intended to manage the grant of visas in a manner that ensures the Migration Program aligns with government-set planning levels. The Direction provides specific guidance on the order of consideration for applications, prioritising those where the Minister exercises intervention powers under sections 345, 351, and 417 of the Act, as well as applications made by orphan relatives, which should be processed outside the queue system. All other applications should be assigned a queue date, with priority given to cases remitted following a successful review and applications made by carers or special need relatives. The Direction revokes the previous Direction No. 24 and is applicable nationally across Australia, with its provisions extending to all visa classes subject to caps as determined under section 85. The Direction does not specify exclusions or exemptions but implies that certain applications, such as those meeting specific criteria under sections 87 and 87A, may not be entirely precluded from consideration under section 86.

Key Provisions

The primary sections of Direction No. 27 under the Migration Act 1958 (section 499) provide guidance on the order for considering or disposing of visa applications when a cap on the number of visas that may be granted in a financial year has been reached. This is particularly relevant under sections 85 and 86 of the Act, which govern the maximum number of visas that can be issued within a financial year and the cessation of visa grants once the cap is reached, respectively. Section 91 of the Act empowers the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs to consider or dispose of visa applications in an order deemed appropriate. The obligations imposed by this direction on the parties or entities it governs are multifaceted. Decision-makers under the Act are required to prioritise certain applications over others in their consideration and disposal process. Specifically, the highest priority should be given to applications where the Minister exercises intervention powers under sections 345, 351, and 417 of the Act, and to applications made by persons on the grounds of being an orphan relative. These applications should be processed outside the queue system. All other applications must be placed in a queue and assigned a queue date, which is typically the date when the applicant meets the last criteria for the relevant subclass of visa. When assigning queue dates, priority should be given to cases remitted following successful review applications and to applications made by carers or special need relatives. The Act also outlines several potential consequences and penalties for non-compliance with this direction. Although the direction itself does not explicitly detail specific penalties for breaches, failure to adhere to the stipulated order of consideration and disposal could potentially lead to legal challenges or administrative penalties. Additionally, the direction underscores the importance of applicants meeting certain requirements, such as health or character clearances, within specified timeframes to avoid being affected by the cap on visa grants. Non-compliance with these requirements could result in the applicant being subject to section 86 again, thereby further delaying their visa application process. In summary, Direction No. 27 establishes a structured approach for managing visa applications when caps are reached, ensuring that certain high-priority applications are processed first while maintaining an orderly queue for others. It imposes clear obligations on decision-makers to follow this order of precedence and provides guidance on how queue dates should be assigned. While the direction does not specify penalties for non-compliance, it highlights the necessity for applicants to meet all requirements within stipulated timeframes to avoid further complications.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Immigration & Refugee Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Enforcement Powers
Regulatory Standards
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.