EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Migration Act 1958
APPROVAL OF ACTIVITIES
(PARAGRAPHS 235(7)(a) and 245AF(a))
- This Instrument is made under paragraph 235(7)(a) and paragraph 245AF(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (‘the Act’)
- Paragraph 235(7)(a) of the Act provides that ‘work’ for the purposes of section 235 of the Act does not include an activity in which a person in immigration detention engages voluntarily where the activity is of a kind approved in writing by the Secretary.
- Paragraph 245AF(a) of the Act provides that no offence is committed where a person in immigration detention engages voluntarily in an activity of a kind approved in writing by the Secretary.
- The purpose of the Instrument is to specify the list of approved activities that a person in immigration detention is able to participate in.
- The Instrument operates to ensure people who are in immigration detention and participate voluntarily in one of the approved activities are not engaging in ‘work.’ The effect of this Instrument is that an offence would not be committed if a person in immigration detention engages voluntarily in activities such as gardening or cleaning for personal purposes.
- Pursuant to section 18 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (Cth) consultation is not necessary as the Instrument is of a machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements.
- The Office of Best Practice Regulation’s Business Cost Calculator and Assessment Checklists were used to determine that there would be low or no compliance cost on business and low other impacts on competition in relation to this instrument.
8. The Instrument, IMMI 10/019, commences on 11 June 2010.
Overview
The Migration Act 1958, enacted by the Australian Parliament, is a comprehensive piece of legislation governing immigration and border control. The Act, as amended, addresses various aspects of migration including the definition of "work" for individuals in immigration detention. The Explanatory Statement for the legislative instrument F2010L01570 clarifies that this instrument was introduced to provide specific guidelines on the activities that individuals in immigration detention can voluntarily engage in without it being classified as "work." This legislative instrument ensures that certain voluntary activities, such as gardening or cleaning for personal purposes, do not contravene the provisions of the Act. By approving these activities in writing, the Secretary ensures that detainees are not committing an offence when participating in these tasks. The objective of this instrument is to maintain the integrity of the Act's definition of work while allowing detainees to engage in productive activities. The instrument is deemed to be of a machinery nature and, as such, consultation was not required under section 18 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Scope and Application
The Migration Act 1958, as supplemented by the legislative instrument IMMI 10/019, outlines specific activities that individuals in immigration detention can engage in voluntarily without these activities being classified as 'work' under the Act. This legislation applies to persons in immigration detention and specifies the nature of approved activities that do not constitute work, thereby ensuring that such activities do not result in an offence. The list of approved activities, which might include tasks such as gardening or cleaning for personal purposes, is determined by the Secretary and approved in writing. This ensures that the participation in these activities does not violate the provisions of the Act. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of this legislation is national, as it operates under the Commonwealth's authority. Notably, this instrument does not substantially alter existing arrangements and thus does not require consultation under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (Cth). It is designed to clarify and streamline the application of the Act in relation to voluntary activities by individuals in immigration detention.
Key Provisions
The main provisions of the Instrument, IMMI 10/019, are contained within paragraphs 235(7)(a) and 245AF(a) of the Migration Act 1958. According to paragraph 235(7)(a), activities undertaken by individuals in immigration detention that have been approved in writing by the Secretary are not considered 'work' for the purposes of section 235 of the Act. Similarly, paragraph 245AF(a) states that if a person in immigration detention voluntarily engages in an activity that has been approved in writing by the Secretary, no offence is committed. The Instrument serves to clarify and specify the types of activities that can be approved for participation by those in immigration detention, ensuring that such activities do not constitute 'work' under the Act. For example, engaging in gardening or cleaning for personal purposes would not be considered work if these activities have been approved by the Secretary.
The Act imposes certain obligations and requirements on the parties involved, primarily the Secretary of the Department of Immigration and Border Protection. The Secretary is responsible for approving activities that individuals in immigration detention can engage in voluntarily. These activities must be specified in writing and ensure that the person in detention is not engaging in work as defined under the Act. The Act does not specify the criteria for approval but leaves it to the discretion of the Secretary, ensuring that the activities are suitable and do not conflict with the purpose of the detention or the individual's health and safety. The Act also places a responsibility on individuals in immigration detention to adhere to the approved activities and not to engage in any activities that have not been approved by the Secretary.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Instrument can lead to various consequences. If an individual in immigration detention engages in activities that have not been approved by the Secretary, they could be considered to be engaging in 'work,' which may have legal implications. According to the Act, if a person in detention undertakes an activity that is not approved and it is deemed as work, they could face penalties or other legal consequences. Although the Instrument does not specify detailed penalties, breaches of the Act can generally result in civil or criminal penalties as outlined in other sections of the Migration Act. These penalties can include fines or imprisonment, depending on the severity of the breach and the discretion of the court.
The explanatory statement highlights that the Instrument does not require consultation under section 18 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (Cth) as it is of a machinery nature and does not substantially alter existing arrangements. This means that the Instrument is primarily procedural, aiming to clarify and specify approved activities rather than introducing new substantive changes to the law. The Office of Best Practice Regulation has assessed the Instrument and determined that it would result in low or no compliance costs for businesses and minimal impact on competition. This assessment indicates that the Instrument is designed to be administratively straightforward and not burdensome for the parties it governs.