Merit Protection (Australian Government Employees) Regulations (Amendment)

Legislation au C2004L00348 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

STATUTORY RULES 1987 No.91

MERIT PROTECTION (AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES) REGULATIONS (AMENDMENT)

Issued with the authority of the Public Service Board

Subsection 85(1) of the Merit Protection (Australian Government Employees) Act 1984 (‘the Merit Protection Act) provides, inter alia, that the Governor-General may make regulations prescribing all matters which are required or permitted to be prescribed, or necessary or convenient to be prescribed, for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.

A number of the provisions of the Public Service Legislation (Streamlining) Act 1986 (‘the Streamlining Act’), which, inter alia, amend the Merit Protection Act, come into operation on 14 June 1987, the date proclaimed by the Governor-General for the purposes of subsections 2(2) and 2(4) of the Streamlining Act (Executive Council Minute No. PSB 1987/8 refers).

Section 110 of the Streamlining Act inter alia substitutes a new paragraph 17(1)(c) of the Merit Protection Act. That provides that the third member of a Disciplinary Appeal Committee shall be:

‘a person nominated by the organisation that is, as provided by the regulations, the appropriate organisation….

The statutory rules make miscellaneous amendments to the Merit Protection (Australian Government Employees) Regulations (‘the Merit Protection Regulations’). Some of the amendments give effect to provisions inserted in the Merit Protection Act by the Streamlining Act: in particular in the area of Disciplinary Appeal Committees. Others are consequential on the amendments made to the Public Service Act 1922, or relate to the amendments made to the Public Service Regulations (Executive Council Minute No. PSB 1987/9 refers), particularly in the area of higher duties appeals. Details of the statutory rules are as follows.

Regulation 1 provides for the Regulations to come into operation on 14 June 1987.

Regulation 2 is a citation provision.

Regulation 3 omits the definition of ‘relevant Secretary’ from the Merit Protection Regulations and inserts a definition of ‘the Secretary’, consistent with amendments made by subsequent regulations to the Merit Protection Regulations.


Regulation 4 makes formal amendments to the Merit Protection Regulations, and corrects a minor error.

Regulation 5 inserts new regulations 4A and 4B in the Merit Protection Regulations. These regulations relate to appeals against directions to perform higher duties, and are consequential on the amendments to the Public Service Regulations noted above.

New regulation 4A requires the Merit Protection and Review Agency to notify the Secretary of the Department, or each Department, affected by a higher duties appeal, of that appeal. This will enable a Secretary to consider whether the Agency should be advised that release of the appellant officer to perform the duties in question would cause substantial difficulties in the functioning of the Department.

New regulation 4B provides for the determination of higher duties appeals brought under the new provisions of the Public Service Regulations.

Regulation 6 omits a definition of ‘Chief Officer’ for the purposes of Part IV (Disciplinary Appeal Committees) of the Merit Protection Regulations and inserts a definition of ‘Secretary’ for the purposes of that Part. (See the comments in relation to regulation 10 of these Regulations below).

Regulation 7 substitutes a new regulation 11, which defines the ‘appropriate organisation’ for the purposes of new s.17(1)(c) of the Merit Protection Act (see above). That organisation is the union which has the greatest number of members doing comparable work to the work done by the person who is appealing to the Disciplinary Appeal Committee.

Regulation 8 makes amendments to regulation 12 which are consequential to the new version of regulation 11.

Regulation 9 substitutes ‘Convenor’ for ‘Chairman’ in regulation 17 (see comments in relation to regulation 10 below).

Regulation 10 and its Schedule substitute ‘Secretary’ for ‘Chief Officer’ and ‘Convenor’ for ‘Chairman’ (i.e. Chairman of the various Review Committees) throughout the Merit Protection Regulations, consequential to amendments made by the Streamlining Act to the Merit Protection Act; and omitting reference to S.66B of the Public Service Act 1922, consequential to other amendments made by the Streamlining Act.


The regulations are to come into operation on 14 June 1987. They are therefore made in reliance on section 4 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, which provides that where an Act has received the Royal Assent but has not yet come into operation, regulations may be made as if the Act had commenced, but the regulations shall not take effect until the Act commences.

SR 93/87

Overview

The Merit Protection (Australian Government Employees) Regulations (Amendment) Statutory Rules 1987 No.91 were enacted to amend the existing Merit Protection (Australian Government Employees) Regulations. These amendments were made in response to changes introduced by the Public Service Legislation (Streamlining) Act 1986 and other related Acts. The purpose of these regulations is to streamline the merit protection framework for Australian government employees, particularly in the areas of disciplinary appeal committees and higher duties appeals. They were issued with the authority of the Public Service Board under subsection 85(1) of the Merit Protection (Australian Government Employees) Act 1984, with the policy objective of ensuring that the regulatory framework supports efficient and fair administrative processes within the public service. The regulations came into effect on 14 June 1987, in alignment with the commencement date of the Streamlining Act, and they include various formal amendments and insertions to the Merit Protection Regulations to reflect the legislative changes.

Scope and Application

The Merit Protection (Australian Government Employees) Regulations (Amendment) Statutory Rules 1987 No. 91, issued under the authority of the Public Service Board, primarily aim to amend the Merit Protection (Australian Government Employees) Regulations in response to the Public Service Legislation (Streamlining) Act 1986. These amendments, which come into effect on 14 June 1987, pertain to Australian government employees covered under the Merit Protection Act 1984. They include modifications to the disciplinary appeal committee structure and processes, such as changing the nomenclature from "Chief Officer" and "Chairman" to "Secretary" and "Convenor," respectively. The regulations also address the composition and nomination process of the third member of Disciplinary Appeal Committees and outline procedures for appeals against directions to perform higher duties. These statutory rules are designed to streamline and formalise the administrative processes for handling disciplinary matters and higher duties appeals within the Australian public service.

Key Provisions

The Merit Protection (Australian Government Employees) Regulations (Amendment) Statutory Rules 1987 No.91 primarily focus on amending the Merit Protection (Australian Government Employees) Regulations to align with the provisions introduced by the Public Service Legislation (Streamlining) Act 1986. Regulation 3 removes the definition of 'relevant Secretary' from the Merit Protection Regulations and introduces a new definition of 'the Secretary', which aligns with the amendments made by subsequent regulations. Regulation 4 formalises these amendments and corrects a minor error in the existing regulations. Regulation 5 introduces new regulations 4A and 4B, which pertain to appeals against directions to perform higher duties. Regulation 4A requires the Merit Protection and Review Agency to notify the Secretary of the affected Department about any higher duties appeal, enabling the Secretary to assess if releasing the appellant officer would cause substantial difficulties in departmental operations. Regulation 4B outlines the process for determining these appeals. The amended regulations impose obligations on the Merit Protection and Review Agency and the affected Departments. For instance, under new regulation 4A, the Agency must notify the relevant Secretary about higher duties appeals, providing an opportunity for the Secretary to voice any concerns regarding the release of the appellant officer. This notification requirement ensures transparency and allows for departmental input on the potential impact of releasing the officer in question. Similarly, new regulation 4B sets out the determination process for higher duties appeals, ensuring a structured approach to resolving these disputes. In terms of penalties and consequences, the statutory rules themselves do not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breaches. However, breaches of the Merit Protection Act or the Public Service Act 1922, which these regulations seek to implement, may result in penalties as prescribed by those Acts. For example, under the Merit Protection Act, certain actions could lead to disciplinary actions against Australian Government employees, including termination of employment. The severity of the penalties would depend on the nature and seriousness of the breach, and would be determined in accordance with the relevant provisions of the primary legislation.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.