Meat Inspection (Orders) Regulations 1984
Statutory Rules 1984 No. 115 as amended
made under the
Meat Inspection Act 1983
This compilation was prepared on 5 June 2003
taking into account amendments up to SR 2002 No. 60
Prepared by the Office of Legislative Drafting,
Attorney-General’s Department, Canberra
Contents
1 Name of Regulations [see Note 1]
2 Interpretation
3 Orders
4 Offences
Notes
1 Name of Regulations [see Note 1]
These Regulations are the Meat Inspection (Orders) Regulations 1984.
2 Interpretation
In these Regulations, unless the contrary intention appears, the Act means the Meat Inspection Act 1983.
3 Orders
The Minister may, by instrument in writing, make orders, not inconsistent with the Act or with regulations made under the Act, with respect to any matter for or in relation to which provision may be made by regulations made under the Act.
4 Offences
(1) If an order made under regulation 3 provides that it or a provision of it is a prescribed penal provision, a person who fails to comply with the order or provision commits an offence punishable by a fine of 10 penalty units.
(2) An offence under subregulation (1) is an offence of strict liability.
Note For strict liability, see section 6.1 of the Criminal Code.
Notes to the Meat Inspection (Orders) Regulations 1984
Note 1
The Meat Inspection (Orders) Regulations 1984 (in force under the Meat Inspection Act 1983) as shown in this compilation comprise Statutory Rules 1984 No. 115 amended as indicated in the Tables below.
Table of Statutory Rules
Year and number | Date of notification in Gazette | Date of commencement | Application, saving or transitional provisions |
1984 No. 115 | 22 June 1984 | 22 June 1984 | |
2002 No. 60 | 5 Apr 2002 | 5 Apr 2002 | — |
Table of Amendments
ad. = added or inserted am. = amended rep. = repealed rs. = repealed and substituted |
Provision affected | How affected |
R. 1................. | rs. 2002 No. 60 |
R. 4................. | rs. 2002 No. 60 |
Overview
The Meat Inspection (Orders) Regulations 1984 were enacted under the Meat Inspection Act 1983 to provide a framework for the issuance of specific orders in relation to meat inspection, thereby addressing gaps in regulatory oversight and ensuring the consistent application of meat inspection standards across Australia. These regulations, administered by the Minister, allow for the creation of written orders that align with the overarching provisions of the Meat Inspection Act 1983 and any other regulations made under it. The policy objective behind these regulations is to maintain high standards of meat hygiene and safety through a structured and enforceable compliance mechanism. Failure to comply with an order designated as a prescribed penal provision under these regulations results in an offence of strict liability, punishable by a fine of up to 10 penalty units, thereby ensuring rigorous enforcement of meat inspection regulations.
Scope and Application
The Meat Inspection (Orders) Regulations 1984, which were made under the Meat Inspection Act 1983, govern the process by which the Minister may issue orders related to meat inspection. These regulations apply to any matter for or in relation to which provision may be made by regulations under the Meat Inspection Act 1983. The scope of the Act extends to any persons or entities involved in the meat industry, including meat processors, transporters, and retailers, as well as any conduct or transactions related to meat inspection. The Act has a national jurisdictional reach, applying across Australia under the authority of the Commonwealth. The regulations allow for the creation of specific orders that must not be inconsistent with the Act or with other regulations made under the Act. Failure to comply with an order that has been designated as a prescribed penal provision results in an offence of strict liability, which is punishable by a fine of up to 10 penalty units. The application of the Act and the Regulations can be extended or modified through subordinate instruments, ensuring flexibility in addressing new issues or changes in the meat inspection landscape.
Key Provisions
The Meat Inspection (Orders) Regulations 1984 (SR 1984 No. 115), as amended, provide a framework for the issuance of orders by the Minister under the Meat Inspection Act 1983 (section 3). These orders must not contradict the Act or any regulations made under it and can pertain to any matter that the regulations may cover. The Act itself is defined as the Meat Inspection Act 1983 (section 2). Any orders made under these regulations may include penal provisions, which, if specified, make non-compliance with these orders an offence (section 4(1)).
Under the Meat Inspection (Orders) Regulations 1984, the Minister is empowered to issue written orders that align with the Meat Inspection Act 1983 and other regulations made under it. This authority is broad, allowing the Minister to address various matters pertinent to meat inspection through these orders (section 3). These orders serve as a regulatory tool to ensure compliance with meat inspection standards and practices as outlined in the Act. The regulations further specify that if an order designates a particular provision as a penal provision, any failure to comply with that provision is considered an offence (section 4(1)).
Failure to comply with an order that is designated as a penal provision under the Meat Inspection (Orders) Regulations 1984 is an offence of strict liability, meaning that intent or negligence is not required to be proven for conviction (section 4(1) and Note). The penalty for such an offence is a fine of 10 penalty units, as per the stipulated provisions (section 4(1)). This strict liability framework ensures that the regulations are enforced rigorously, maintaining high standards of meat inspection compliance.
The consequences of breaching an order under the Meat Inspection (Orders) Regulations 1984 are clear and stringent. Non-compliance with a designated penal provision results in a criminal offence, carrying a penalty of 10 penalty units (section 4(1)). Given the nature of strict liability, individuals or entities found in breach can be prosecuted without needing to prove intent or negligence. This regulatory approach underscores the importance of adhering to meat inspection standards and the potential legal repercussions for failing to do so.