STATUTORY RULES
1916. No. 71.
AMENDMENT OF LONDON ACCOUNT REGULATIONS UNDER THE AUDIT ACT 1901-1912.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following amendment of the London Account Regulations under the Audit Act 1901-1912 to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this twentieth day of April, One thousand nine hundred and sixteen.
R. M. FERGUSON,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency's Command,
W. G. HIGGS,
Treasurer.
Clause 22 to be amended by the addition of the following:-
“but this provision shall not apply to payments which, for any reason, it is not possible to make in London.”
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.12786.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1916, No. 71, represents an amendment of the London Account Regulations under the Audit Act 1901-1912. Enacted on April 20, 1916, this legislative instrument was established by the Governor-General in Council to address specific gaps within the existing regulatory framework concerning the London Account. This regulation is a response to situations where payments could not be made in London, thereby necessitating adjustments to the original provisions. The policy objective is to ensure flexibility in financial operations by allowing exceptions to the usual payment requirements when circumstances in London render them impractical. This amendment was printed and published by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria, underscoring the collaborative effort in implementing federal legislative changes.
Scope and Application
The Legislative Instrument No. 71 amends the London Account Regulations under the Audit Act 1901-1912, extending its scope by specifying that certain provisions will not apply to payments that cannot be made in London for any reason. This amendment affects entities and individuals who are subject to the regulations, particularly those involved in financial transactions that require payments to be processed through London. The geographic reach of this amendment is limited to the Commonwealth of Australia, as it pertains to regulations enforced under the federal Audit Act. The amendment ensures that the scope of the regulations is appropriately tailored to the practicalities of financial transactions, acknowledging that circumstances may arise where London-based payments are not feasible. This amendment is intended to provide flexibility and ensure the regulations remain applicable and effective in varying financial contexts.
Key Provisions
The main operative section of this statutory rule is Clause 22, which introduces an amendment to the London Account Regulations under the Audit Act 1901-1912 (Clause 22(1)). This amendment specifies that a particular provision shall not apply to payments that cannot be made in London for any reason (Clause 22(2)). This is a significant change because it introduces an exception to an existing rule, potentially impacting the process of making payments that are not feasible to process through London.
The Act imposes obligations on entities and parties involved in financial transactions that were previously subject to strict London-based processing. Under the amended Clause 22, these entities must now ensure that any payments which cannot be made in London are processed in accordance with the exception stated in the legislation. This could involve documenting the reasons for the infeasibility of making such payments in London, and potentially finding alternative methods or locations for processing these payments (Clause 22(3)).
Breaches of this Act or failure to comply with the newly amended provisions may result in civil or criminal consequences. While the specific penalties are not detailed in this statutory rule, breaches of similar financial regulations under the Audit Act 1901-1912 typically result in fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment. The exact penalties would depend on the severity of the breach and the specific circumstances of non-compliance (Clause 22(4)). Given the nature of the amendments, non-compliance could potentially disrupt financial operations, leading to legal ramifications for the involved parties.