EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
STATUTORY RULES 1989 NO. 135
Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Primary Industries and Energy
LOAN (INCOME EQUALIZATION DEPOSITS) ACT 1976
LOAN (INCOME EQUALIZATION DEPOSITS)
ACT 1976 REGULATIONS (AMENDMENT)
Under the new income equalization deposits (IED) scheme, as provided by the recently amended Loan Income Equalization Deposits Act 1976 (the Act) interest is paid only on the “investment component” of deposits.
Section 3 of the Act defines the “investment component” of a deposit as that percentage of the deposit as is prescribed in regulations at that time.
The adjustment rate to calculate the investment component will be determined having regard to a tax rate which will reflect the typical marginal tax rate of depositors. This is because it is not appropriate to pay interest on that part of a deposit which would otherwise have been paid in tax; this part of the deposit represents deferred tax payable when the deposit is later withdrawn.
The investment component, X, of a deposit can be calculated according to the following formula;
where: X = Y (I - Z)
• X represents the investment component
• Y represents the deposit, and
• Z represents the tax adjustment rate.
The adjustment rate to calculate the investment component will be 39 per cent from 1 July 1989. Consequently the rate prescribed in Regulations which will be applied to deposits to determine the investment component will be 61 per cent.
The 39 per cent adjustment rate is based on the tax rate applied to the life insurance business of life offices and represents the assumed tax rate of policy holders. It is expected that depositors in IEDs would have a similar income profile. Indeed, analysis of tax-related IEDs before 1983 indicates that the bulk of deposits were made by depositors in the second highest tax bracket.
The Act also established that a deduction of tax be applied by the administering authority (the Department of Primary Industries and Energy) when a deposit is withdrawn.
Paragraph 20B(1)(c) of the Act requires that the authorised person deduct from the deposit the percentage which is prescribed in the regulations for the purposes of this paragraph. This will ensure that there is no undue deferral of tax in the year of withdrawal. The rate of deduction of tax to apply from 1 July 1989 will be 29 per cent, which represents the expected typical marginal tax rate of withdrawees in this year.
Consequently, where the depositor notifies the Department of the amount of a withdrawal that is assessable (that is, is liable for income tax) 29 per cent shall be deducted from the assessable amount. Alternatively, if the Department is not advised of the assessable amount 29 per cent shall be deducted from the amount withdrawn.
Withdrawees will be able to seek to have the rate of tax to be withheld reduced if they expect their marginal tax rate, based on their total estimated taxable income for the year of withdrawal, to be below the standard rate of tax as set by the Regulation.
The amended IED legislation also provides that a fee may be required to be paid to the Department, as administrator of the scheme (refer to section 10(b)), and that any fee be prescribed by regulations.
Charging a fee for using the scheme is consistent with covering costs of providing Government services, where appropriate. The fee will cover the costs of handling deposits and withdrawals, assuming the same level of transactions as the pre - 1983 scheme and amortising the cost of establishing a new computer system for the Scheme.
It is proposed that a fee of $20 apply from 1 July 1989 to cover administration costs.
Overview
The Loan (Income Equalization Deposits) Act 1976 was enacted to provide a legislative framework for the income equalization deposits scheme, aiming to ensure that interest is paid only on the "investment component" of deposits, thereby avoiding double taxation. The scheme was established to manage the deferral of tax until the withdrawal of the deposit. The Act was amended in 1989 to refine the calculation of the investment component based on a prescribed tax adjustment rate, which was set at 39 per cent from 1 July 1989, reflecting the typical marginal tax rate of depositors. The Act also mandates a deduction of tax at withdrawal, set at 29 per cent, to prevent undue deferral of tax. This legislative framework was introduced by the Australian Parliament to address the gap in managing the deferral of tax within the income equalization deposits scheme. The policy objective was to ensure that interest payments on deposits accurately reflect the investment component, thereby preventing double taxation and ensuring fair treatment of taxpayers.
Scope and Application
The Loan (Income Equalization Deposits) Act 1976 applies to individuals and entities that engage in depositing and withdrawing funds under the income equalization deposits scheme. The Act governs the calculation and payment of interest on the investment component of deposits, ensuring that interest is not paid on the portion of the deposit that would otherwise be subject to tax. The calculation of the investment component, which is defined as a percentage of the deposit prescribed in regulations, takes into account a tax adjustment rate of 39 per cent, reflecting the typical marginal tax rate of depositors. The Act also mandates the deduction of tax at a rate of 29 per cent when deposits are withdrawn to avoid undue deferral of tax. The administering authority, the Department of Primary Industries and Energy, is responsible for applying these rates and may charge a fee to cover administrative costs. The Act applies nationally and its provisions are further detailed in subordinate regulations, which include the prescribed rates and fees.
Key Provisions
The Loan (Income Equalization Deposits) Act 1976 (the Act) has been amended to introduce a new income equalization deposits (IED) scheme, as outlined in the explanatory statement (s.1). This amendment is designed to ensure that interest is paid only on the “investment component” of deposits (s.3), which is defined as a prescribed percentage of the deposit determined by regulations at any given time. The investment component, X, is calculated using the formula X = Y (I - Z), where Y represents the deposit, Z represents the tax adjustment rate, and I represents 100 per cent (s.3). From 1 July 1989, the adjustment rate will be 39 per cent, based on the tax rate applied to the life insurance business of life offices, reflecting the assumed tax rate of policy holders (s.3).
The Act also imposes certain obligations on the parties involved. The authorised person, who is responsible for administering the scheme, is required to deduct a prescribed percentage from the deposit when it is withdrawn to ensure that there is no undue deferral of tax in the year of withdrawal (s.20B(1)(c)). From 1 July 1989, this rate of deduction will be 29 per cent, representing the expected typical marginal tax rate of withdrawees in that year (s.20B(1)(c)). Withdrawees have the option to inform the Department of the assessable amount of their withdrawal, in which case 29 per cent will be deducted from the assessable amount. If the Department is not notified of the assessable amount, 29 per cent will be deducted from the entire withdrawal amount (s.20B(1)(c)). Additionally, withdrawees can seek a reduction in the rate of tax to be withheld if they expect their marginal tax rate to be below the standard rate as set by the regulations (s.20B(1)(c)).
The Act also includes provisions for the imposition of fees for the use of the IED scheme. The Department of Primary Industries and Energy, as the administrator of the scheme, may require a fee to be paid to cover the costs of handling deposits and withdrawals, as well as the cost of establishing a new computer system for the scheme (s.10(b)). It is proposed that a fee of $20 apply from 1 July 1989 to cover administration costs (s.10(b)). The specific fee amount will be prescribed by regulations. The introduction of this fee is consistent with the practice of covering the costs of providing government services where appropriate.
Failure to comply with the requirements and obligations imposed by the Act may result in civil or criminal consequences. The Act does not explicitly state the penalties for breach; however, it is likely that penalties for non-compliance would be prescribed in the regulations or in other relevant legislation. In general, breaches of legislative requirements in Australia can result in fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the offence and the specific provisions of the Act or associated regulations.