KALGOORLIE TO PORT AUGUSTA RAILWAY LANDS.
No. 36 of 1920.
An Act to amend the Kalgoorlie to Port Augusta Railway Lands Act 1918.
[Assented to 20th October, 1920.]
BE it enacted by the King’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:—
Short title and citation.
1.—(1.) This Act may be cited as the Kalgoorlie to Port Augusta Railway Lands Act 1920.
(2.) The Kalgoorlie to Port Augusta Railway Lands Act 1918, as amended by this Act, may be cited as the Kalgoorlie to Port Augusta Railway Lands Act 1918–1920.
Lands held under lease.
2. Section four of the Kalgoorlie. to Port Augusta Railway Lands Act 1918 is amended by omitting the words “and the land so specified shall be deemed to be vested in the Commissioner”.
Application of State law as to arbitration.
3. Section fifteen of the Kalgoorlie to Port Augusta Railway Lands Act 1918 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following proviso:—
“Provided that the jurisdiction and powers of any Court or Judge under that law shall be exercisable exclusively by the High Court or a Justice thereof.”
Overview
The Kalgoorlie to Port Augusta Railway Lands Act 1920 was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to amend the existing Kalgoorlie to Port Augusta Railway Lands Act 1918. This Act aimed to address certain issues and make improvements to the legislative framework governing the lands associated with the railway line between Kalgoorlie and Port Augusta. The 1920 Act introduced modifications to the tenure and arbitration provisions concerning the lands, ensuring clarity and consistency in their management. One of the primary objectives of this Act was to refine the legal standing of lands held under lease and to specify the exclusive jurisdiction of the High Court or a Justice thereof for arbitration matters, thereby providing a more streamlined and authoritative legal process.
Scope and Application
The Kalgoorlie to Port Augusta Railway Lands Act 1920 amends the 1918 Act to alter the administration and legal jurisdiction concerning lands held under lease for the railway line between Kalgoorlie and Port Augusta. This legislation applies to all lands specified under lease for the railway line, affecting the entities and individuals who hold leases for these lands. The geographic scope of the Act is limited to the lands along the specified railway corridor, thereby impacting the industries and transactions associated with these lands. Jurisdictionally, the Act falls under the Commonwealth of Australia, with specific amendments to the application of state law concerning arbitration, now restricted to the High Court or a Justice thereof. There are no explicit exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds mentioned in the Act; however, the application and interpretation of the Act may be further refined through subordinate instruments issued under its authority.
Key Provisions
The Kalgoorlie to Port Augusta Railway Lands Act 1920, as enacted, makes specific amendments to the 1918 Act concerning the management and jurisdiction over lands associated with the railway corridor between Kalgoorlie and Port Augusta. Section 2 of the Act removes the clause from the original Act that previously vested the land in the Commissioner, which means that the land is no longer automatically deemed to be vested in the Commissioner upon certain conditions. Section 3 introduces a proviso to Section 15 of the original Act, clarifying that any jurisdiction and powers under State law concerning arbitration related to the railway lands must be exercised exclusively by the High Court or a Justice thereof. This ensures a federal oversight on arbitration matters, aligning them with higher judicial standards.
The Act imposes certain obligations on parties and entities involved with the lands in question. Firstly, the removal of automatic vesting of land in the Commissioner under Section 2 may require parties to seek alternative legal avenues for land management or to comply with specific conditions set out in the amended Act. Additionally, Section 3’s proviso mandates that any arbitration matters must be handled by the High Court or a Justice thereof, ensuring that these disputes are resolved with a federal judicial perspective, rather than a state-level court. This places an obligation on the involved parties to ensure that their arbitration processes are compliant with this higher standard of judicial authority.
Violations of the provisions set forth in the Act could lead to several consequences. While specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the provided text, it can be inferred that non-compliance with the jurisdictional requirements for arbitration could result in legal challenges or disputes being dismissed for lack of proper authority. Additionally, any failure to adhere to the conditions regarding the management of lands, particularly in the absence of automatic vesting, might result in legal action to clarify land rights or management. The precise legal and financial penalties would depend on the nature of the breach and would be determined by the relevant courts, potentially including fines or other civil remedies.