Judiciary (Diplomatic Representation) Act 1942

Legislation au C1942A00002 Not in force Act

Legislation content

JUDICIARY (DIPLOMATIC REPRESENTATION).

 

No. 2 of 1942.

An Act to enable a Justice of the High Court to accept and hold a certain Office.

[Assented to 8th May, 1942.]

BE it enacted by the Kings Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:—

Short title.

1. This Act may be cited as the Judiciary (Diplomatic Representation) Act 1942.

Commencement.

2. This Act shall come into operation on the day on which it receives the Royal Assent.

Authority to accept and hold certain office.

3. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Judiciary Act 1903-1940, if His Majesty shall see fit to appoint the Honourable Owen Dixon to be Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary for the Commonwealth of Australia in the United States of America, he may accept that appointment and hold the same as well as the office of a Justice of the High Court of Australia and his service as Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary for the Commonwealth of Australia in the United States of America shall for all purposes count as service in the office of a Justice.

Overview

The Judiciary (Diplomatic Representation) Act 1942 was enacted to address a unique situation where a Justice of the High Court, Owen Dixon, was appointed as Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary for the Commonwealth of Australia in the United States of America. This Act was passed to allow Justice Dixon to accept and hold this diplomatic office concurrently with his judicial role, thereby ensuring continuity in the judiciary without necessitating his resignation from the High Court. The enacting body for this legislation was the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, with the policy objective being to maintain the integrity and stability of the judiciary while accommodating a critical diplomatic appointment. This Act was specifically crafted to ensure that Justice Dixon could serve both roles effectively, without prejudice to his judicial service.

Scope and Application

The Judiciary (Diplomatic Representation) Act 1942 is a specific piece of legislation that pertains to the exceptional circumstances where a Justice of the High Court of Australia may accept and hold a diplomatic office. This Act applies directly to the Honourable Owen Dixon, allowing him to accept an appointment as Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary for the Commonwealth of Australia in the United States of America while maintaining his position as a Justice of the High Court of Australia. It ensures that his service in the diplomatic role is considered equivalent to service in his judicial capacity. The Act operates within the Commonwealth of Australia and its provisions are not subject to any specific exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds as they are tailored to this particular case. The Act’s authority to extend its application is implicitly limited to the circumstances described within its text, and it does not extend or restrict application through subordinate instruments.

Key Provisions

The Judiciary (Diplomatic Representation) Act 1942 (sections 1-3) sets out the authority for a Justice of the High Court to accept and hold a diplomatic office. Section 1 establishes the short title of the Act as the "Judiciary (Diplomatic Representation) Act 1942", while Section 2 states that the Act comes into operation on the day it receives Royal Assent. Section 3 provides the substantive authority, allowing the Honourable Owen Dixon to accept and hold the office of Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary for the Commonwealth of Australia in the United States of America, notwithstanding any conflicting provisions in the Judiciary Act 1903-1940. This section also specifies that any service rendered in this diplomatic capacity shall count as service in the office of a Justice of the High Court of Australia. The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on the parties it governs, primarily the Honourable Owen Dixon in this instance. Under Section 3, Dixon is permitted to accept and hold the diplomatic office while concurrently serving as a Justice of the High Court. The Act ensures that his diplomatic service is recognised as equivalent to his judicial service, maintaining his status and privileges in both capacities. This dual role is contingent on the approval of His Majesty, as stipulated in the Act, ensuring that the diplomatic appointment aligns with the interests and policies of the Crown. There are no explicit provisions in the Act that detail specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breach. The Act primarily focuses on enabling the specified appointment and ensuring that the service rendered in the diplomatic role is recognised and valued similarly to service in the judicial office. Given the nature of the Act and its singular focus on facilitating a specific appointment, it does not provide for sanctions or penalties for non-compliance with its terms. The absence of such provisions suggests that the Act operates under the assumption that the terms it sets forth will be adhered to without the need for punitive measures.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Constitutional Law
Instrument
Act
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Regulatory Standards
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.