29 January 2018
Invitation to comment on a genetically modified (GM) buffalo grass field trial
Australia’s gene technology regulatory system is designed to protect the health and safety of people and the environment by identifying risks posed by, or as a result of, gene technology and managing those risks.
The Gene Technology Regulator is currently assessing licence application DIR 156 from the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) University in Victoria. The application is for a field trial (limited and controlled release) of buffalo grass genetically modified for herbicide tolerance and dwarf growth habit. The purpose of the field trial is to assess the agronomic characteristics of the GM buffalo grass plants under field conditions.
The trial is proposed to take place between April 2018 and April 2019 in Bundoora (Victoria) on a maximum area of 200 m2. GM buffalo grass grown in this field trial would not be used as animal feed.
A consultation Risk Assessment and Risk Management Plan (RARMP) has been prepared, which concludes that the proposed release would pose negligible risk to human health and safety or to the environment. A range of draft licence conditions would limit the size, location and duration of the release, as well as restrict the spread and persistence of the GMOs and the introduced genetic material.
The Regulator welcomes written submissions in order to finalise the RARMP, which will then inform the decision on whether or not to issue the licence. The consultation RARMP and related documents can be obtained from the OGTR website under What’s New or by contacting the Office. Please quote application DIR 156 in any correspondence.
Submissions should be received by close of business on 1 March 2018.
Office of the Gene Technology Regulator, MDP 54, GPO BOX 9848 CANBERRA ACT 2601
Telephone: 1800 181 030 E-mail: ogtr@health.gov.au
OGTR website www.ogtr.gov.au
Overview
The Gene Technology Act 2000, enacted by the Australian Parliament, is designed to regulate the use of gene technology within the country. This legislation aims to protect the health and safety of people and the environment by effectively managing the risks associated with gene technology. The Act establishes a regulatory framework overseen by the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR), which is responsible for assessing applications and issuing licences for the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The overarching policy objective of the Act is to ensure that gene technology activities are conducted in a manner that minimises potential risks to human health and the environment while promoting innovation and research. The Act provides a structured approach to the assessment and management of risks associated with gene technology, reflecting the need for a balanced approach that supports scientific advancement while safeguarding public and environmental interests.
Scope and Application
The Gene Technology Act 2000, administered by the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR), applies to the proposed genetically modified (GM) buffalo grass field trial conducted by RMIT University in Victoria. This Act governs the regulation of gene technology in Australia with a view to protecting the health and safety of people and the environment. The legislation covers entities seeking to conduct gene technology activities, including research, field trials, and commercial cultivation of GM organisms. The geographic reach of this Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act. In this particular case, the Act applies to the specified trial of GM buffalo grass proposed to be conducted in Bundoora, Victoria, between April 2018 and April 2019. The application DIR 156 is subject to the provisions of the Act and any subordinate instruments that may extend or restrict its application. The trial is subject to a Risk Assessment and Risk Management Plan (RARMP) which, if approved, will inform the decision on whether to issue the licence. The Act provides for exclusions and exemptions, but these are not specified in the invitation for comment. The OGTR invites submissions to finalise the RARMP, with a closing date of 1 March 2018.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of the proposed legislation pertain to the field trial of genetically modified buffalo grass, which is subject to the assessment of the Gene Technology Regulator under section 49 of the Gene Technology Act 2000 (Cth). Section 49(1) mandates that the Regulator must determine whether to grant a licence for the trial based on the assessment of risks as outlined in a Risk Assessment and Risk Management Plan (RARMP). This plan, as described in section 49(2), is to be prepared by the applicant, in this case, RMIT University, and should include all relevant information regarding the potential risks and management strategies for the proposed trial. The specific parameters of the trial, including the location (Bundoora, Victoria), timeframe (April 2018 to April 2019), and area (maximum 200 m2), are outlined in the licence application DIR 156.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved in the proposed trial. Under section 51, the applicant must ensure that the trial adheres to the specified conditions outlined in the RARMP, which includes measures to prevent the spread and persistence of the genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Additionally, the applicant must submit all necessary documentation, including the RARMP, to the Regulator for review. The Regulator, under section 49(3), is responsible for assessing the application and the associated risks, making a determination on whether to issue the licence based on the information provided. Furthermore, under section 52, the Regulator may impose additional conditions on the licence if deemed necessary to manage any identified risks.
In the event of a breach of the terms and conditions outlined in the Act or the licence, there are potential civil and criminal consequences. Under section 123, any person who contravenes a condition of a licence is liable to a civil penalty. The maximum penalty for an individual is 500 penalty units, while for a body corporate, the maximum penalty is 2,500 penalty units as stipulated in section 123(1). Additionally, under section 125, any person who intentionally or recklessly contravenes a provision of the Act that is punishable by imprisonment may be subject to criminal penalties. The maximum penalty for an individual is 2,000 penalty units or imprisonment for five years, or both, while for a body corporate, the maximum penalty is 10,000 penalty units or imprisonment for five years, or both. These penalties serve to enforce compliance with the regulatory requirements and to deter any non-compliance that could pose risks to human health and the environment.