International Wheat Agreement (Extension)
No. 94 of 1967
An Act to approve the Signature and Acceptance by Australia of the 1967 Protocol to the International Wheat Agreement, 1962.
[Assented to 9 November 1967]
BE it enacted by the Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:—
Short title.
1. This Act may be cited as the International Wheat Agreement (Extension) Act 1967.
Commencement.
2. This Act shall come into operation on the day on which it receives the Royal Assent.
Approval of signature and acceptance of the Protocol.
3. Approval is given to the signature and acceptance by Australia of the 1967 Protocol to the agreement referred to in the International Wheat Agreement Act 1962.
Overview
The International Wheat Agreement (Extension) Act 1967 was enacted to facilitate the extension of the 1967 Protocol to the International Wheat Agreement of 1962. This Act was introduced to ensure that Australia could continue participating in the international framework governing wheat trade and production, thereby maintaining its role in global agricultural markets. The Parliament of Australia enacted this legislation to approve the signature and acceptance of the 1967 Protocol, ensuring compliance with international agreements and supporting Australia's agricultural interests on the world stage. The policy objective is to support the stability and predictability of wheat trade, which is crucial for both domestic and international economic considerations.
Scope and Application
The International Wheat Agreement (Extension) Act 1967 applies to the Commonwealth of Australia and pertains to the approval of Australia's signature and acceptance of the 1967 Protocol to the International Wheat Agreement, 1962. This Act facilitates Australia's participation in the international framework governing wheat trade and agreements, aligning with the broader objectives of the original International Wheat Agreement Act 1962. The Act extends to the entire Commonwealth, thereby affecting national policies and trade practices related to wheat. While the Act does not explicitly outline specific exclusions or exemptions, its primary function is to ensure that Australia's participation in the international wheat trade adheres to the terms set forth in the 1967 Protocol. The application of this Act may be further defined or extended through subordinate legislation, which would provide additional detail on implementation and enforcement within the scope of Australia's international obligations.
Key Provisions
The International Wheat Agreement (Extension) Act 1967 (section 1) provides for the extension of the International Wheat Agreement, originally established in 1962, through the adoption of a 1967 Protocol. The Act (section 2) came into operation immediately upon receiving Royal Assent, on 9 November 1967. Section 3 of the Act grants approval for Australia to sign and accept the 1967 Protocol, which serves to extend the terms of the original International Wheat Agreement. The Act formalises Australia's commitment to the updated agreement, ensuring continuity in international wheat trade relations.
Under this Act, the main obligation imposed on Australia is the adherence to the terms and conditions outlined in the 1967 Protocol to the International Wheat Agreement (section 3). This includes obligations related to the trade, export, and import of wheat, as well as any other provisions agreed upon by the signatory countries. The Act ensures that Australia is bound by the new terms, which may include quotas, pricing mechanisms, and other trade-related measures designed to maintain stability and fairness in the global wheat market.
In terms of enforcement and compliance, the Act does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for non-compliance with the 1967 Protocol. However, the obligations under the Protocol itself, which Australia agrees to by virtue of this Act, are likely to be enforced under international law and through diplomatic channels. Non-compliance could potentially lead to trade disputes, sanctions, or other diplomatic repercussions, although the specific consequences would depend on the nature and extent of the breach. It is also worth noting that any breaches of related domestic legislation enacted to implement the Protocol could result in penalties under those specific laws.