COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
Intention to develop a draft bilateral agreement
with the State of Tasmania under section 45 of the
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth)
In accordance with subsection 45(3) of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (the EPBC Act), I, GREG HUNT, Minister for the Environment, give notice of my intention to develop a draft bilateral agreement with the State of Tasmania which includes a declaration under section 46 of the EPBC Act that classes of actions do not need approval under Part 9 of the EPBC Act.
.
Overview
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) was enacted to provide for the protection of the environment, particularly matters of national environmental significance, by regulating actions that have, will, or might have a significant impact on the environment. This Act was introduced to address the need for a comprehensive legislative framework that ensures the protection of Australia’s environment and biodiversity through federal oversight. The intention to develop a draft bilateral agreement with the State of Tasmania, as notified by the Minister for the Environment, Greg Hunt, aims to streamline environmental approvals and reduce administrative burdens while ensuring that significant environmental impacts are appropriately managed. This initiative is intended to foster cooperative federalism by allowing states to take on greater responsibilities for environmental protection, provided that they meet the standards set by the EPBC Act.
Scope and Application
The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) applies to a broad range of actions, entities and persons that may impact on matters of national environmental significance. In the specific context of the intention to develop a draft bilateral agreement with the State of Tasmania, the Act extends to any actions that may impact on these matters, including those conducted by both public and private sector entities. The geographic reach of the Act is nationwide, with the Commonwealth having jurisdiction over actions impacting on specified environmental matters. However, the Act provides for certain exclusions, exemptions, and thresholds, including where actions are deemed to have no significant impact on matters of national environmental significance. The development of the draft bilateral agreement with Tasmania may further refine the application of the Act through subordinate instruments, potentially expanding the scope of exclusions or exemptions for certain actions within the state. The intention to develop this agreement reflects a collaborative approach between the Commonwealth and Tasmania to better manage and protect Australia's unique biodiversity and environmental resources.
Key Provisions
The primary sections of relevance here are sections 45 and 46 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (EPBC Act). Section 45(3) provides the Minister for the Environment the authority to develop a draft bilateral agreement with a state, in this case, Tasmania. This agreement would involve a declaration under section 46 of the EPBC Act that certain classes of actions do not require approval under Part 9 of the EPBC Act, which governs environmental impact assessments. This declaration is intended to streamline environmental assessments and approvals by identifying actions that do not necessitate detailed scrutiny.
Under this legislative framework, the Minister, Greg Hunt, has an obligation to engage in the process of drafting a bilateral agreement with the State of Tasmania. This involves consulting with relevant stakeholders and ensuring that the proposed classes of actions identified in the declaration are consistent with Australia's environmental protection and biodiversity conservation objectives. The Minister must also consider the potential impacts of these actions and ensure that any exemptions granted do not compromise the integrity of the EPBC Act or Australia's international obligations under environmental treaties.
Failure to comply with the requirements of the EPBC Act can result in significant legal consequences. Under section 875 of the EPBC Act, any person who contravenes the Act may be subject to civil penalty provisions, which can include fines up to $666,000 for individuals and $3.3 million for corporations. Additionally, criminal penalties can be imposed for more serious breaches, including fines of up to $5.5 million and/or imprisonment for up to five years for individuals and up to $27.5 million and/or imprisonment for up to ten years for corporations. The Act also provides for the possibility of injunctions and other remedies to ensure compliance and to address any environmental harm caused by non-compliance.
The process of developing this bilateral agreement and the subsequent declaration under section 46 must be conducted with careful consideration of environmental impacts and legal obligations. The Minister is required to ensure that the declaration is justified and that it aligns with broader environmental protection goals. Any actions that are exempted from approval under Part 9 must be carefully evaluated to ensure they do not lead to significant environmental harm or biodiversity loss. The Minister's role is crucial in balancing economic development with environmental sustainability.