Instrument varying the Veterans' Children Education Scheme under subsection 117(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (No. 7 of 1998)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2005B01287 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

INSTRUMENT No.7 OF 1998

 

    VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

           Veterans’ Children Education Scheme

                       Section 117

 

 

EXPLANATORY NOTE

 

1.The Minister for Veterans’ Affairs has approved the

attached instrument under subsection 117 (3) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986.

 

2. The Instrument varies the Veterans’ Children Education Scheme (‘the Scheme’) by :

 

  • removing references in the Scheme that refer to the defunct AUSTUDY Scheme and substituting references that refer to the new YOUTH ALLOWANCE;

 

  • empowering the Repatriation Commission to grant rent assistance to homeless students and to double orphans;

 

  • clarifying the Repatriation Commission’s power to grant a specific education allowance to double orphans;

 

  • making a number of variations that streamline the Scheme; and by

 

  • making minor drafting-type variations.

 

3.The variations are described in more detail in the attachment.

 

 

 

    


ATTACHMENT

 

Paragraph 1 contains the preamble to the Instrument.

 

Paragraph 2 ensures the variations commence on 1 July 1998 and ensures that on the commencement of the variations, the provision enabling the grant of ‘rent assistance’, insofar as it relates to ‘homeless students’ and to ‘double orphan students’, is to be taken to have commenced on 1 January 1995 so as to remove any doubt that the grant of rent assistance to these classes of students on and after that date was not authorised.

 

Paragraph 3 rectifies a typographical error.

 

Paragraph 4 inserts a new definition of ‘appropriate person’ which describes and extends the class of persons to whom education allowances can be paid on behalf of a student in certain circumstances. For example, if a homeless student is considered to be incapable of managing his or her finances then payment of the relevant allowance will not be made directly to the student but will be made to an ‘appropriate person’.

 

Paragraph 5 introduces new definitions of ‘approved’ and ‘not otherwise approved’. These terms are currently referred to in the Scheme but were not defined, which created confusion. The new variations define the terms.

 

 

 

Paragraph 6 inserts a new definition of ‘double orphan’ which was made necessary by the introduction in the Scheme of an express power to grant education allowances to double orphans.

 

Paragraph 7 introduces a definition of the ‘Social Security Act 1991’ in the Scheme and ensures that references to this Act in the Scheme are references to that Act as in force from time to time.

 

Paragraph 8 ensures that the Repatriation Commission can only appoint a person to make a claim for an allowance on behalf of a dependant under 16, not only if a parent of the dependant is dead or unwilling to make the claim but also only if a guardian of the dependant is dead or unwilling to make the claim or if a person approved by a parent or a guardian is dead or unwilling to make the claim.

 

Paragraph 9 streamlines paragraph 2.4.1 of the Scheme by:

 

  •                  replacing the reference to ‘the Department of Social Security’ with the more appropriate reference to ‘Centrelink’ with the result that ‘clearances’ confirming that potential beneficiaries under the Scheme are not receiving similar benefits under other Commonwealth Government schemes are to also be provided by Centrelink; and by

 

  •                  correcting the outmoded reference to the Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

 

Paragraphs 10, replace references to the AUSTUDY

11 and 12  tertiary progress rules/regulations in paragraphs 2.5.3 to 2.5.5 of the Scheme with references to the YOUTH ALLOWANCE tertiary progress rules. This part of the Scheme empowers an Education Board to assess a student’s progress in accordance with the progress rules and if the student is failing to make progress the Board may refer the case to the Repatriation Commission which may determine that if the student has failed to make progress in accordance with the progress rules, the student is to cease receiving benefits. The Scheme further provides in this part that if a Board is of the opinion that a tertiary student has failed to meet the progress rules by reason of circumstances beyond his or her control, then the student may continue to receive benefits.

 

Paragraph 13 incorporates the words “ on a full-time basis” in paragraph 2.7.1 of the Scheme as a consequence of paragraph 2.8.1 of the Scheme being revoked (see paragraphs 17 and 18 of the Instrument). Paragraph 2.8.1 of the Scheme was revoked because it duplicated the matters in paragraph 2.7.1 of the Scheme apart from the reference to the requirement for students to be undertaking study ‘on a full-time basis’ in order to be eligible for benefits under the Scheme.

 

Paragraph 14 ensures that a student may receive benefits under the Scheme only if he or she is undertaking a tertiary course of education or study that would qualify the student for a Youth


 Allowance if the student was otherwise eligible for the Youth Allowance.

 

Paragraphs 15 replace the references to courses ‘approved for and 16                             the payment of AUSTUDY’, in sub-

paragraph 2.7.1 (c) of the Scheme and sub-sub paragraph 2.7.1(c)(ii) of the Scheme, with references to courses that would ‘qualify a

student for the payment of YOUTH

ALLOWANCE’ (approved course) with the result that a tertiary student who is not undertaking an approved course may nevertheless receive benefits under the Scheme if the Commission considers the unapproved course is essential to achieve the students vocational aim and no approved course is suitable or available.

  

Paragraph 17 deletes paragraphs 2.8 and 2.8.1 of the Scheme as they duplicate the matters in paragraphs 2.7 and 2.7.1 of the Scheme and are unnecessary.

 

Paragraph 18 removes the reference to ‘2.8.2’ in paragraph ‘2.8.2’ of the Scheme and substitutes ‘2.7.2’ to reflect the variations made by paragraph 17 of the Instrument.

 

Paragraph 19 prevents ‘double-dipping’ by ensuring that recipients of allowances in a particular category cannot receive allowances in another category unless allowed by the Scheme.

 

Paragraph 20 streamlines the former provision by removing anomalous references to the situation of a secondary student ‘boarding’, thereby ensuring that education allowances may be paid to


 secondary students living away from home but who are not necessarily boarding with any person.

 

Paragraph 21 varies sub-paragraph 3.4.2 (b) of the Scheme

(which specifies the person to receive an allowance on behalf of a secondary student living away from home) to reflect the variation made by paragraph 20 of the Instrument to paragraph 3.4.1 of the Scheme, by the addition of the words ‘if any’, to highlight the fact that secondary students living away from home might not necessarily be boarding.

 

Paragraph 22 reproduces the former paragraph 3.4.3 of the Scheme in a streamlined form and provides that payment of allowance to secondary students living away from home may be made in part or in full, and a term in advance - to an institution, or a term in advance or fortnightly - to a person, as determined by the Repatriation Commission.

 

Paragraph 23 reproduces the former heading of ‘Homeless Student Allowance’ but with the addition of the word ‘Education’ in order to highlight the fact that the allowance homeless students receive under the Scheme is for education.

 

Paragraph 24 replaces former paragraph 3.6.2 of the Scheme

(level of homeless student allowance determined by reference to AUSTUDY) with new paragraphs 3.6.2 and 3.6.3 which essentially reproduces the former paragraph but ensures that the level of allowance a homeless


student is to receive is to be ascertained by reference to the maximum basic rate payable

under the Youth Allowance provisions of the Social Security Act 1991 to an independent person. This variation was necessary as a consequence of the replacement of the AUSTUDY scheme with the Youth Allowance. The new paragraphs also ensure the allowance may be paid to an ‘appropriate’ person ( See paragraph 4 of the Instrument) if the student is financially irresponsible, and not solely to a trustee as was the case under the previous provision. Thus, the class of people to whom an allowance may be paid in these special circumstances has been broadened.

 

Paragraph 25 introduces a new provision which clarifies the power to grant allowances to double orphans. A definition of ‘double orphan’ was inserted by paragraph 6 of the Instrument. A secondary or tertiary student who is a double orphan is entitled to an allowance for education and training. Payment of the allowance is to be made as follows:

 

  • if the student is a secondary student under 16 years of age — to the person who receives pension on behalf of the child;
  • if the student is a secondary student 16 years of age or over — to an appropriate person (defined by paragraph 4 of the Instrument) who may forward the payment to the student;
  • if the student is a tertiary student — to the student.

 

Paragraph 26 replaces the reference to ‘paragraph 2.8.2’ in paragraph 3.7.1 of the Scheme with a reference to paragraph 2.7.2 because of the variations made by paragraphs 17 and 18 of the Instrument.

 

Paragraph 27 replaces the existing heading to paragraph 3.8 of the Scheme with the heading ‘Indexing and increasing education allowances’ because the new heading more accurately depicts the types of matters encompassed by paragraphs 3.8 1 to 3.8.4 of the Scheme.

 

Paragraph 28 replaces the words ‘1 January 1994’ in paragraph 3.8.1 of the Scheme with the words ‘1 January 1999’ to ensure that the need to index the allowances described in paragraph 3.8.1 of the Scheme in accordance with the procedure described in paragraph 3.8.2 of the Scheme ( ie procedure in the Social Security Act 1991) only arises on and after 1 January 1999 because the relevant allowances have been indexed in respect of the year 1998.

 

Paragraph 29 removes the reference to the requirement in paragraph 3.8.1 of the Scheme that the allowances described in paragraph 3.8.1 of the Scheme are to be indexed by reference to the Consumer Price Index, because it is a superfluous reference in that the relevant allowances will automatically be indexed by reference to the Consumer Price Index under the procedure specified in paragraph 3.8.2 of the Scheme (ie procedure in the Social Security Act 1991).

 

Paragraph 30 replaces paragraph 3.8.2 of the Scheme with a new paragraph 3.8.2 which provides that the annual education allowance for primary

 students and the fortnightly education allowance for secondary students under 16 years of age and living at home are to be indexed annually in accordance with the procedure in the Social Security Act 1991 that is used to index the maximum basic rate of youth allowance. Previously the relevant education allowances were indexed in accordance with procedures in the Student Assistance Act 1973 but these procedures will be repealed as a consequence of the new provisions in the Social Security Act 1991 relating to the Youth Allowance.

 

Paragraph 31 replaces the reference to ‘boarding away from home’ in paragraph 3.8.3 of the Scheme with ‘living away from home’ to reflect the variations made to paragraph 3.4.1 of the Scheme (by Paragraph 20 of the Instrument) which recognised that secondary students needing to pursue their education ‘away from home’ need not necessarily be ‘boarding’ with a person.

 

Paragraph 32 reproduces the former paragraph 3.8.4 of the Scheme except that education allowances for students aged 16 years and over are to equate to the maximum basic rate of Youth Allowance payable under the Youth Allowance provisions of the Social Security Act 1991. Previously the relevant education allowances were to equate to the maximum rates payable under the AUSTUDY Scheme but the AUSTUDY Scheme will be repealed by the new Youth Allowance provisions hence the need to align

 paragraph 3.8.4 of the Scheme with the Youth Allowance provisions.

 

Paragraph 33 varies the procedure in paragraph 5.1.1 of the Scheme that permits the Repatriation Commission to reimburse a tertiary student’s fares between his or her home and place of study, by ensuring that the rate of reimbursement and conditions of reimbursement are determined by reference to the relevant ‘fares instrument’ made under the Social Security Act 1991. Previously the rate of reimbursement and conditions of reimbursement were determined by reference to the AUSTUDY regulations but these regulations will be repealed when the AUSTUDY scheme is replaced by the Youth Allowance provisions of the Social Security Act 1991 - hence the need to vary paragraph 5.1.1 of the Scheme.

 

Paragraph 34 introduces new paragraphs 5.5 and 5.5.1 in the Scheme which will enable a ‘homeless student’ or a ‘double orphan student’ to receive rent assistance.

 

Paragraph 35 replaces the word ‘determinations’ in paragraph 8.2 of the Scheme (which is concerned with the review of ‘determinations’) with ‘decisions’ because the matters that may be reviewed under paragraph 8.2 of the Scheme are more appropriately regarded as ‘decisions’.

 

Paragraph 36 ensures the variations made to the Scheme by Instrument No.7 of 1998 apply to:

 

  • students receiving benefits under the Scheme before 1 July 1998; and to
  • all decisions made on or after 1 July 1998 whether or not any application or proceedings relating to the decision commenced before, on or after that date.

 

 

Overview

The Veterans’ Children Education Scheme, enacted under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, was introduced to address the educational needs of children of veterans, ensuring they have access to necessary support and resources. This legislation was enacted by the Australian Parliament and aims to provide comprehensive educational assistance to the dependents of veterans, promoting their educational development and future prospects. The 1998 amendments to the Scheme sought to modernise and streamline the provisions, particularly by updating references to reflect changes in other government support schemes such as the replacement of the AUSTUDY Scheme with the Youth Allowance. The policy objective remains to support the educational advancement of veterans' children, adapting to current social security frameworks while ensuring continuity and clarity in the provision of benefits.

Scope and Application

The Veterans’ Children Education Scheme, as varied by the Instrument No.7 of 1998 under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, applies to students who are children of veterans and who are pursuing tertiary education. The Scheme provides financial assistance to these students, including allowances for education and rent, and aims to ensure that they do not face financial barriers in their pursuit of education. The Repatriation Commission is responsible for administering the Scheme, including the assessment of students’ progress and the determination of allowances. The Instrument updates references from the defunct AUSTUDY Scheme to the new YOUTH ALLOWANCE and clarifies various powers and definitions to ensure effective administration. The changes also empower the Repatriation Commission to provide rent assistance to homeless students and double orphans, and clarify the circumstances under which allowances can be paid to an ‘appropriate person’ if the student is unable to manage their finances. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act, but it specifically targets the veteran community and their children across Australia. The Act does not explicitly state exclusions or exemptions, but the eligibility criteria, such as being a child of a veteran and undertaking a qualifying course of study, implicitly set boundaries. The Act’s application may be further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, as indicated by the reference to varying procedures and definitions in alignment with other legislative changes such as those in the Social Security Act 1991.

Key Provisions

The Veterans’ Children Education Scheme, as varied by Instrument No.7 of 1998, introduces several key changes. Firstly, the instrument removes references to the AUSTUDY Scheme and replaces them with references to the new YOUTH ALLOWANCE (paragraphs 10 to 16). It also empowers the Repatriation Commission to grant rent assistance to homeless students and double orphans (paragraphs 34 and 35). Additionally, the instrument clarifies the Repatriation Commission's power to grant a specific education allowance to double orphans (paragraph 25). It introduces new definitions for terms such as "appropriate person," "approved," and "double orphan" (paragraphs 4, 5, and 6) and updates references to ensure they align with the Social Security Act 1991 (paragraph 7). The instrument also streamlines certain provisions and removes duplications (paragraphs 17 to 19 and 27 to 32). The variations made to the Scheme apply to students receiving benefits before 1 July 1998 and all decisions made on or after that date (paragraph 36). Under the varied Scheme, the Repatriation Commission has specific obligations. It must grant rent assistance to homeless students and double orphans (paragraphs 34 and 35) and determine the level of education allowances for these students based on the YOUTH ALLOWANCE provisions (paragraphs 24 and 30). The Commission must also ensure that education allowances are indexed annually in accordance with the procedure in the Social Security Act 1991 (paragraph 30). Furthermore, the Commission must comply with the new definitions and provisions introduced by the instrument, such as determining who qualifies as an "appropriate person" and whether a student is a "double orphan" (paragraphs 4, 5, and 6). For breaches of the varied Scheme, the Repatriation Commission may face civil or administrative penalties depending on the nature and severity of the breach. The specific penalties are not detailed in the instrument, but they would typically involve financial penalties or corrective actions. It is important for the Commission to adhere to the provisions of the Scheme to avoid any legal or financial repercussions. The instrument does not specify criminal penalties, but serious breaches could potentially lead to criminal charges under other relevant legislation.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Affairs
Education Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Enforcement Powers
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.