Instrument of Approval No. TMRO 1999/1

Administered by Attorney-General's Department

Legislation au F1999B00266 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

Commonwealth of australia

 

 

Customs Act 1901

 

Instrument of Approval No. TMRO 1999/1

 

Approval of form for application for review of a decision whether to publish

a dumping duty notice or a countervailing duty notice

 

 

I, Geoffrey Arthur Hine, a person acting in the office of Trade Measures Review Officer, approve, under subsection 269ZXA of the Customs Act 1901, the form set out in the Schedule as the form for applying for review of a decision referred to in paragraph 269ZZA (a) or (b) of that Act (that is, a decision of the Minister whether to publish a dumping duty notice or countervailing duty notice).

 

 

Dated 1 April 1999.

 

 

 

 

 

 

G. A. Hine

 

 

SCHEDULE

 

 


APPLICATION TO

TRADE MEASURES REVIEW OFFICER

FOR REVIEW OF A DECISION

WHETHER TO PUBLISH

A DUMPING DUTY NOTICE, OR

A COUNTERVAILING DUTY NOTICE

 

 

DECLARATION

 

I hereby request, in accordance with Section 269ZZA of the Customs Act 1901, that the Trade Measures Review Officer review a decision by the Minister responsible for Customs:

 

to publish :  a dumping duty notice(s), or

  a countervailing duty notice(s)

OR

not to publish :  a dumping duty notice(s), or

  a countervailing duty notice(s)

 

in respect of the goods which are the subject of this application.

 

I believe that the information contained in the application:

  • provides reasonable grounds for a review to be undertaken; and
  • is complete and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.

 

 

 

Signature: ….………………………………………………………………………..

 

Name: …………………………………….…………………………………………

 

Position: ……….…………………………………………………………………….

 

Company: ......………..……………………………………………………….........

 

Date:            /            /

 

 

 

NOTE: This page must be completed by the applicant and attached to the front of the application.

 

 Parties engaging a consultant or adviser to act on their behalf should enclose a copy of the authorisation for the consultant/adviser.

 

 If the application contains material that is confidential or commercially sensitive, a nonconfidential version, containing sufficient detail to give other interested parties a clear and reasonable understanding of the information being put forward, must be provided or the application will not be accepted.


REVIEWABLE DECISIONS

Division 9 of Part XVB of the Customs Act 1901 (the Act) deals with reviews by the Trade Measures Review Officer (the Review Officer).  Where a party is of the opinion that grounds exist to review a reviewable decision by the Minister, that party has the right to seek a review.  Intending applicants should familiarise themselves with the relevant sections of the Act, and should also examine the explanatory brochure produced by the Trade Measures Review Secretariat.

The role of the Review Officer is to review certain decisions made by the Minister responsible for Customs, or by the Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Customs Service (the CEO).

Decisions made by the Minister which are reviewable:

- to publish a dumping duty notice;

- to publish a countervailing duty notice;

- not to publish a dumping duty notice; and

- not to publish a countervailing duty notice.

Note : The Review Officer has the power only to make recommendations to the Minister.  The Review Officer may not revoke the Minister’s decision or substitute another decision.

Decisions not reviewable by this process include decisions by the Minister:

- to accept an undertaking in respect of a dumping or subsidy matter;

- to vary the amount of the ascertained normal value, export price and non-injurious price imposed by an existing notice;

- to continue or not to continue dumping or countervailing measures; and

- following a review by the Review Officer.

REVIEW OF A MINISTERIAL DECISION

Any interested party may lodge an application for review.  An “interested party” may be:

- the original applicant for dumping or countervailing measures;

- a party representing the industry, or a portion of the industry, which produces the goods which are the subject of the reviewable decision;

- a party directly concerned with the importation or exportation to Australia of the goods;

- a party directly concerned with the production or manufacture of the goods;

- a trade association, the majority of whose members are directly concerned with the production or manufacture, or the import or export of the goods to Australia; or

- the government of the country from which the goods originated or were exported.

Intending applicants should refer to section 269ZX of the Act to establish whether they are eligible to apply.

THE APPLICATION

An application for a review must be received within 30 days after a public notice of the reviewable decision was first published in a national Australian newspaper.

An application must clearly and comprehensively set out the grounds on which a review is sought, and provide sufficient particulars concerning the challenged finding or findings to satisfy the Review Officer that a reinvestigation of these could lead to a change to the reviewable decision to which the application relates.  It is not sufficient simply to request that a decision be reviewed.

The Review Officer does not have any investigative function, and will take account only of information to which the CEO had regard, or was required to have regard, when making recommendations to the Minister.  The Review Officer will disregard any information in applications and submissions which was not available to the CEO.

TIMING OF THE REVIEW

The Review Officer will recommend to the Minister within 60 days of the public notification of the review - but not sooner than 30 days from the publication of the notice - that the reviewable decision be affirmed, or that the CEO be directed to reinvestigate the finding or findings which formed the basis of the reviewable decision.  In special circumstances the Minister may allow the Review Officer a longer period for completion of the review.

INFORMATION WHICH MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE APPLICATION

  • Name, street and postal address, and form of business of the applicant (for example company, partnership, sole trader).
  • Name; title/position; telephone and facsimile numbers; and e-mail address of a contact within the organisation.
  • Name of consultant (if any) representing the applicant.
  • Specified interest in a review.  (Refer to categories of interested parties listed under “Review of a Ministerial Decision”, above).
  • Full description of the imported goods to which the application relates.
  • The tariff classification/statistical code of the imported goods.
  • Where applicable, the number and title of the Australian Customs Service report relating to the decision in question.
  • The finding or findings in that report that the Review Officer is being asked to review, (such as like goods, Australian industry, export prices, normal values, dumping, material injury, causal link, threat of material injury, non-injurious price).
  • A detailed statement setting out the ground or grounds which would, in the applicant’s view, warrant the reinvestigation of the finding or findings which formed the basis of the decision by the Minister whether to publish a dumping duty notice or a countervailing duty notice.  Such a statement must accompany each claim in an application for review.

 

WHERE TO LODGE THE APPLICATION

Applications must be lodged with, or mailed to:

The Trade Measures Review Officer

Robert Garran Offices

National Circuit

BARTON  ACT  2601

AUSTRALIA

 

or sent by facsimile to:

 

+61 2 6250 5914


FURTHER INFORMATION

Further information about reviews by the Trade Measures Review Officer can be obtained from:

Trade Measures Review Secretariat

Robert Garran Offices

National Circuit

BARTON  ACT  2601

 

Telephone: +61 2 6250 6220

Facsimile: +61 2 6250 5914

 

Inquiries and requests for general information about dumping matters should be directed to:

Director, Dumping Liaison Unit

Australian Customs Service

Customs House

5 Constitution Avenue

CANBERRA  CITY  ACT  2601

 

Telephone:  +61 2 6275 6066

Facsimile:  +61 2 6275 6990

 

Overview

The Customs Act 1901, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, governs various aspects of customs and excise in Australia. To address the need for a formal process to review decisions regarding the publication of dumping duty notices or countervailing duty notices, the Customs Act 1901 was amended to include provisions for such reviews. Specifically, Instrument of Approval No. TMRO 1999/1, dated 1 April 1999, approved a form for applying for the review of a decision by the Minister responsible for Customs to publish or not publish dumping duty notices or countervailing duty notices. The policy objective behind these amendments is to ensure transparency and fairness in the decision-making process related to anti-dumping and countervailing duties, allowing interested parties to challenge ministerial decisions through a structured review process.

Scope and Application

The Customs Act 1901, through Instrument of Approval No. TMRO 1999/1, governs the application process for a review of decisions made by the Minister responsible for Customs concerning the publication of dumping duty notices or countervailing duty notices. This legislation applies to any interested party that believes they have grounds to challenge a decision made by the Minister, including the original applicant for such measures, industry representatives, parties involved in the importation or exportation of the goods in question, trade associations, and the government of the country from which the goods originated or were exported. The Act is geographically applicable across the Commonwealth of Australia, but its primary enforcement is managed through the Trade Measures Review Officer. The review process is limited to decisions on the publication of dumping duty notices or countervailing duty notices, and it excludes decisions regarding accepting undertakings, varying ascertained values, or continuing or discontinuing dumping or countervailing measures. The review application must be submitted within 30 days of the public notice of the reviewable decision, and it must include detailed information about the applicant, the specified interest in the review, the imported goods, and the grounds for the review. The Trade Measures Review Officer will then recommend to the Minister within 60 days whether the decision should be affirmed or if the Chief Executive Officer should reinvestigate the findings. The application form for review, as approved in the legislative instrument, must be attached to the application, and any confidential information must be accompanied by a non-confidential version that provides sufficient detail for other interested parties.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislative instrument, specifically Instrument of Approval No. TMRO 1999/1 under the Customs Act 1901, pertain to the approval of a form for the application for review of a decision by the Minister whether to publish a dumping duty notice or a countervailing duty notice (sections 269ZXA and 269ZZA). This approval is given by the Trade Measures Review Officer, who authorises the use of the form set out in the Schedule for such applications (section 269ZXA). The form itself requires applicants to declare their request for review, stating whether they seek a review of a decision to publish or not to publish a dumping duty notice or a countervailing duty notice (section 269ZZA). The application must be lodged within 30 days of the public notice of the reviewable decision being published in a national Australian newspaper. The obligations imposed by the Act on parties seeking a review include the timely submission of a complete and detailed application. This application must include specific information such as the applicant's details, the nature of their interest in the review, a full description of the imported goods, the tariff classification of the goods, and the findings in the relevant report that the applicant wishes to challenge. Additionally, applicants must provide a detailed statement of the grounds for their review request, ensuring that the Review Officer can understand why a reinvestigation might lead to a different outcome. If the application contains confidential or commercially sensitive information, a non-confidential version must also be provided for other interested parties. The Act does not explicitly outline offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach in this legislative instrument. However, it is clear that the Review Officer's role is limited to making recommendations to the Minister; they cannot revoke the Minister’s decision or substitute another decision. This implies that the consequences of an unsuccessful review are limited to the non-alteration of the Minister's decision, with no explicit penalties or consequences for failing to comply with the procedural requirements of the review process.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Customs Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Review & Sunset Clauses
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.