Information Amendment Principles 2002 (No. 1)
I, KEVIN JAMES ANDREWS, Minister for Ageing, make these Principles under subsection 96-1 (1) of the Aged Care Act 1997.
Dated 17 June 2002
KEVIN ANDREWS
Minister for Ageing
1 Name of Principles
These Principles are the Information Amendment Principles 2002 (No. 1).
2 Commencement
These Principles commence on gazettal.
3 Amendment of Information Principles 1997
Schedule 1 amends the Information Principles 1997.
Schedule 1 Amendment
(section 3)
Do not delete: Schedule Part Placeholder
[1] Paragraph 16.5 (c)
omit
general manager
insert
chief executive officer
Overview
The Information Amendment Principles 2002 (No. 1) were introduced to address the need for updating and aligning the aged care information management practices with the evolving standards and requirements of the sector. Enacted by the Minister for Ageing, Kevin James Andrews, under the authority granted by the Aged Care Act 1997, these principles serve to amend the Information Principles 1997. The primary objective of this legislative instrument is to ensure that the management and handling of personal information within the aged care sector comply with contemporary standards, thereby safeguarding the privacy and dignity of aged care recipients. By amending specific references within the Information Principles 1997, these principles aim to clarify roles and responsibilities, particularly in the context of information governance and oversight within aged care facilities.
Scope and Application
The Information Amendment Principles 2002 (No. 1) apply to entities within the aged care sector, specifically targeting the chief executive officer of such entities. These Principles amend the Information Principles 1997 and are made under subsection 96-1(1) of the Aged Care Act 1997, indicating that they fall within the Commonwealth jurisdiction and are applicable nationally. They are designed to modify the existing framework governing the handling and amendment of information within aged care providers, ensuring that updated governance and management titles are correctly reflected. These Principles do not specify exclusions or exemptions from their application but rather focus on precise amendments to existing regulatory texts. The scope of these amendments is limited to the specified change in the title from "general manager" to "chief executive officer," and they are not extended or restricted by subordinate instruments beyond what is outlined in the legislative instrument itself.
Key Provisions
The Information Amendment Principles 2002 (No. 1) are legislative instruments made under subsection 96-1(1) of the Aged Care Act 1997. These Principles, named specifically as the Information Amendment Principles 2002 (No. 1), came into effect on the date of their gazettal, as stated in section 2. They serve to amend the existing Information Principles 1997, which are detailed in Schedule 1. The primary amendment, as outlined in section 3, involves the substitution of "general manager" with "chief executive officer" in paragraph 16.5(c) of the Information Principles 1997.
The amended principles impose specific obligations on the parties or entities governed by the Aged Care Act 1997. The substitution of "general manager" with "chief executive officer" in paragraph 16.5(c) suggests a shift in responsibility and authority regarding the management of information. This change might necessitate that the chief executive officer now has the primary duty and accountability for ensuring compliance with information management standards and protocols. Furthermore, it may also affect the reporting lines and the chain of command in managing and safeguarding sensitive information within aged care facilities.
Non-compliance with the amended principles or any subsequent regulations can result in both civil and criminal consequences. Although the specific penalties are not detailed within the legislative instrument, the Aged Care Act 1997 provides a framework for enforcement actions. Typically, breaches of aged care legislation can lead to fines, corrective actions, or even criminal charges depending on the severity of the offence. In cases where the breach is deemed serious, the responsible individuals or entities could face substantial financial penalties. Additionally, persistent or severe non-compliance might attract more stringent legal actions, including potential imprisonment for the responsible officers or directors of the entity. The exact penalties would depend on the specific provisions of the Aged Care Act 1997 and any related regulations.