Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Regulations (Amendment)

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F1996B00706 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Regulations (Amendment) 1994 No. 368

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Statutory Rules 1994 No. 368

(Issued by the Authority of the Assistant Minister for Industrial Relations)

Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Act 1989

Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Regulations (Amendment)

Section 111 of the Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Act 1989 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act.

Section 110 of the Act provides that the regulations may prescribe fees, or a method of calculating fees, to be paid to the Commonwealth in respect of a variety of applications, notifications and other actions under the Act.

The new fees set by this amendment reflect a 50% cost-recovery.

Subsection 55(1) of the Act provides that an application may be made for an assessment of a priority existing chemical. Subsection 55(2) makes separate provision for a late application for an assessment. Items 12 and 13 of Schedule 2 (the Schedule) to the Regulations formerly prescribed the fees payable for applications made under subsections 55(1) and 55(2) respectively.

Items 12 and 13 of the Schedule are omitted by regulation 6. Regulations 12A, 12B and 12C, establish a new method for determining the amount and method of payment of the fee payable for an application for an assessment of a priority existing chemical.

Several applications for assessment may be made in respect of a priority existing chemical. Applications can be made by a single person, or jointly, by several persons. The fee payable in respect of each application was $25,000 (and $28,000 for a late application) with the Director having a discretion under regulation 14 to reduce the fee where more than one application is made. Regulation 12A establishes a formula for calculating the fee payable for an application under subsections 55(1) and 55(2) so that the total fee for all applications is divided consistently and equitably between each person making an application.

The fee for an application under subsection 55(1) is determined by the formula n[(a  t) + b] where "n" is the number of people making that application, "a" is $30,000 for a limited assessment, or $60,000 for a standard assessment, "t" is the total number of persons (in all applications) applying for the assessment of the priority existing chemical, and "b" is $2,500.

A limited assessment is an assessment that takes into account only one of the matters specified in paragraphs 32(2)(c), (d), (e) and (f) of the Act. A standard assessment is any other assessment.

In relation to a late application under subsection 55(2) of the Act, new subregulations 12A(2) and 12A(3) provide that the fee is the amount set for an application in subregulation 12A(1) plus $3,000. The additional fee reflects the cost to the Director of recalculating fees and refunding any overpayments in respect of applications previously received.

Subregulation 12B(1) requires the Director to calculate the amount of the fee payable for each application for an assessment of a priority existing chemical after the 28 day period for applications prescribed for in subsection 55(1) has elapsed.

Subregulation 12B(2) requires the Director, on receiving a late application, to calculate the fee payable for that late application, and recalculate the fee payable for any other application or late application already received.

Subregulation 12B(3) requires the Director to inform each applicant of the fee calculated or recalculated under subregulation 12B(1) or 12B(2).

Subregulation 12C(1) provides that the fee must be paid within 14 days of the applicant being informed, pursuant to proposed regulation 12B(3), of the amount due. Subregulation 12C(2) provides that where a person pays a fee for an application, and as a result of a subsequent application, the fee payable is reduced, the Director must refund the difference to the person as soon as possible.

As noted above, regulation 14 provided for the reduction of a fee for an application for assessment of a priority existing chemical where there is more than one application. As a result of the new method of calculating fees this regulation is no longer relevant has been omitted.

Regulation 16 specified the time at which all fees prescribed under the Act are to be paid. The time for payment in respect of applications under subsections 55(1) and 55(2) is now prescribed in regulation 12C. Regulation 16 has been omitted.

As far as they remain relevant, the provisions of regulation 16 are now found at regulation 14 and provide that the fees prescribed under regulation 13 (not being applications for assessment of a priority existing chemical) are to be paid at the time of lodgement of the relevant application, statement, nomination or notification.

Subsection 58(3) of the Act provides that the Director may require certain information to be given to allow the proper assessment of the chemical. Subregulation 15(4) allows the Director to remit 10 per cent of the fee paid in relation to an application under subsections 55(1) or 55(2) of the Act where the applicant supplies the information required under subsection 58(3) in sufficient detail and within the specified time limit.

 

Overview

The Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Regulations (Amendment) 1994 No. 368 was introduced to amend the Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Regulations 1989. Enacted by the Parliament of Australia, this regulation aimed to revise the fee structure for applications related to the assessment of priority existing chemicals under the Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Act 1989. The policy objective behind this amendment was to ensure a 50% cost-recovery for the services provided by the Director, reflecting the financial implications associated with assessing chemicals and managing related applications. This amendment particularly addressed the equitable distribution of fees among multiple applicants and the additional costs incurred for late applications. The new fee calculation method introduced by the amendment was designed to fairly allocate costs among all parties involved in an application, thereby ensuring that the regulatory process remains efficient and financially sustainable.

Scope and Application

The Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Regulations (Amendment) 1994 No. 368, issued under the authority of the Assistant Minister for Industrial Relations, amends the Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Regulations 1989. This amendment pertains to the fees for applications concerning the assessment of priority existing chemicals, reflecting a 50% cost-recovery approach. The changes primarily affect those making applications for assessment of priority existing chemicals, including individuals and entities, who must now navigate the new fee structure outlined in the regulations. The application of these amendments is nationwide, aligning with the overarching jurisdiction of the Commonwealth in regulating industrial chemicals. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions within this particular amendment; however, the Act itself may include provisions that exempt certain chemicals or applications under specific conditions. The amendments extend the application of the Act by introducing a new method for calculating fees, which is detailed in the new regulations, thus modifying the original fee structure and payment processes.

Key Provisions

The Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Regulations (Amendment) 1994 No. 368 (the Amendment) amends the Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Regulations 1989 (the Regulations) under section 111 of the Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Act 1989 (the Act). The amendment primarily revises the fee structure for applications related to the assessment of priority existing chemicals, aligning it with a 50% cost-recovery model. The old fee structure, previously set at $25,000 for a standard application and $28,000 for a late application, is replaced with a new formula outlined in regulation 12A. This new formula ensures a more equitable distribution of fees among multiple applicants. Under the Amendment, the Director of the Department of Industry, Innovation, and Science is tasked with calculating the fees for applications under subsections 55(1) and 55(2) of the Act, particularly after the initial application period has elapsed. Subregulation 12B(1) mandates the Director to calculate fees for applications submitted after the initial 28-day period, while subregulation 12B(2) requires the recalculation of fees for any late or additional applications received. The Director must then inform each applicant of the calculated fee, as stipulated in subregulation 12B(3). Payment of the determined fee must occur within 14 days of notification, as per subregulation 12C(1). In cases where a fee reduction occurs due to subsequent applications, the Director is required to refund any overpaid amount to the original applicant as soon as possible, as outlined in subregulation 12C(2). The Amendment imposes several obligations on applicants and the Director. Applicants must ensure timely payment of the calculated fees within 14 days of notification. The Director, on the other hand, is required to calculate and recalculate fees accurately, inform applicants of the fee amounts, and manage refunds if applicable. Additionally, subregulation 15(4) allows the Director to remit 10% of the fee if the applicant provides the necessary information within the specified timeframe. Failure to comply with these obligations could result in delayed assessments or additional administrative costs. Breach of the obligations under the Amendment may have legal consequences. For instance, failure to pay the calculated fees within the stipulated timeframe could lead to penalties or legal action. The Act does not specify maximum penalties for such breaches, but they may include fines or other administrative actions. The precise consequences would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as well as any additional provisions within the overarching Act or other related legislation.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Environmental Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Fees
Regulatory Standards
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.