Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
NOTICE UNDER SUBSECTIONS 30-85(2) AND 30-85(4)
I, JOSH FRYDENBERG, the Assistant Treasurer, being satisfied that the following funds:
(a) have been established by an organisation declared by the Minister for Foreign Affairs to be an approved organisation; and
(b) are solely for the relief of persons in a country or countries declared by the Minister for Foreign Affairs to be developing countries,
declare, under subsection 30‑85(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, that the following funds are developing country relief funds:
KYEEMA Foundation Developing Country Relief Fund
MicroLoan Foundation Relief Fund
NETWORK KOKODA OVERSEAS DEVELOPMENT FUND
JSF PUBLIC FUND
Adara Overseas Development Aid Fund
The International Children’s Care (Australia) Relief Fund
Be Kids Australia developing country relief FUND
and revoke, under subsection 30‑85(4) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, that the following funds are developing country relief funds:
ISIS Overseas Development Aid Fund
APPACE OVERSEAS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE FUND
FAMILY PLANNING AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED OVERSEAS AID FUND
International Children’s Care (Australia)
This notice takes effect on the date on which it is published in the Gazette.
Dated this 9th day of February 2015
Josh Frydenberg
Assistant Treasurer
Overview
The Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 was enacted to provide a comprehensive framework for the assessment and collection of income tax in Australia. It was introduced to address the need for a cohesive and effective system for managing income tax responsibilities and ensuring compliance among taxpayers. The Act was enacted by the Parliament of Australia and its policy objective is to facilitate the equitable and efficient administration of income tax laws. The Act provides the legal basis for the Australian Taxation Office to assess and collect income tax, as well as to provide for various deductions, credits, and exemptions. It also outlines the rights and obligations of taxpayers and the procedures for lodging tax returns, making payments, and appealing assessment decisions. The 2015 Gazette notice under the Act, signed by Assistant Treasurer Josh Frydenberg, declares certain funds as developing country relief funds, while revoking the status of others, based on their alignment with the criteria set by the Minister for Foreign Affairs.
Scope and Application
The Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 applies to a broad range of entities and individuals within Australia and those entities and individuals engaging in activities that affect Australian taxpayers. It encompasses the assessment and collection of income tax, the administration of tax laws, and the resolution of disputes concerning tax liabilities. The Act applies to all taxpayers, including individuals, companies, trusts, and other entities, and covers various types of income, deductions, offsets, and credits. Geographically, the Act has a national reach, governing tax practices across all states and territories of Australia. The Act may also apply to overseas activities of Australian residents and entities. The Act’s provisions can be extended or modified through subordinate legislation, such as regulations and rulings, which provide further detail and guidance on specific aspects of taxation. There are certain exclusions and exemptions stipulated within the Act, such as specific charitable organisations and activities that may qualify for tax concessions. Additionally, the Act includes thresholds for various tax benefits and obligations, which determine eligibility and liability.
Key Provisions
The Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, under subsections 30-85(2) and 30-85(4), specifies the requirements and provisions for recognising funds as developing country relief funds. Specifically, section 30-85(2) allows the Assistant Treasurer to declare certain funds as developing country relief funds if they are established by an organisation approved by the Minister for Foreign Affairs and are intended solely for the relief of persons in developing countries also approved by the Minister for Foreign Affairs. Conversely, section 30-85(4) provides the Assistant Treasurer with the authority to revoke the status of funds that no longer meet these criteria. This legal framework ensures that only funds that are both appropriately established and directed towards the relief of persons in approved developing countries can be recognised as developing country relief funds.
The obligations imposed by the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 on parties and entities governed by these sections are quite specific. Organisations that wish to establish funds intended for relief efforts in developing countries must first be approved by the Minister for Foreign Affairs. Furthermore, these funds must be clearly earmarked for the relief of individuals in countries that have also been approved by the Minister for Foreign Affairs as developing countries. This dual requirement of organisational and country approval ensures that the funds are directed towards legitimate and effective humanitarian efforts.
Breaching the provisions outlined in the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 can lead to significant consequences. While the Act itself does not explicitly state penalties for non-compliance, it is reasonable to infer that any misuse or misdirection of funds could result in legal action under other sections of the Act or related legislation. For instance, misapplying funds intended for relief efforts could be treated as a misuse of charitable funds, which can lead to civil or criminal penalties. The precise penalties would depend on the specific breaches and the jurisdiction under which they are prosecuted, but they could include fines or imprisonment.
In summary, the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, through its sections 30-85(2) and 30-85(4), establishes a clear framework for the recognition and revocation of developing country relief funds. It imposes stringent obligations on organisations and entities to ensure that funds are appropriately established and used for the intended humanitarian purposes. Breaches of these obligations can lead to serious legal consequences, underscoring the importance of strict adherence to the Act's provisions.