Inclusion of ecological communities in the list of threatened ecological communities under section 181 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (12/10/2007)

Legislation au F2007L04198 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999

 

Instrument under section 184(1)

 

(Issued under the Authority of the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources)

 

The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (the EPBC Act) places certain obligations on the Commonwealth to protect and conserve threatened species, ecological communities and recognise, and where possible, abate key threatening processes listed on the list of threatened species, ecological communities and key threatening processes under the EPBC Act. 

 

Item 58 of Schedule 2 to the Environment and Heritage Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2006 (the Amending Act) enables the Governor-General to make regulations dealing with matters of a transitional, saving or application nature relating to amendments made by the Amending Act.

 

The Environment and Heritage Legislation Amendment Act Regulation 2007 (the Regulations) sets out a process for the inclusion of an item on the list of threatened ecological communities in circumstances where that item was included on the list but was repealed as a result of the operation of section 32 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.  In this instance, the process for the inclusion of an item on the list of threatened ecological communities that applied prior to the commencement of the amendments to the EPBC Act (as contained in the Amending Act) will continue to apply with respect to those communities.

 

The purpose of this instrument is to amend the list of ecological communities established under the EPBC Act in accordance with s184(1)(a) and (b) of the EPBC Act by:

 

including in the list in the critically endangered category:

  •      Mabi Forest (Complex Notophyll Vine Forest 5b);
  •      Swamps of the Fleurieu Peninsula;

 

including in the list in the endangered category:

  • Bluegrass (Dichanthium spp.) Dominant Grasslands of the Brigalow Belt Bioregions (North and South);
  • Brigalow (Acacia harpophylla Dominant and Co-dominant);
  • Semi-evergreen Vine Thickets of the Brigalow Belt (North and South) and Nandewar Bioregions;
  • Shale/Sandstone Transition Forest;
  • The Community of Native Species Dependent on Natural Discharge of Groundwater from the Great Artesian Basin;

 

including in the list in the vulnerable category:

  • Eucalyptus ovata – Callitris oblonga Forest; and

 

deleting from the list in the endangered category:

  • Semi-evergreen Vine Thickets of the Brigalow Belt South Bioregion in New South Wales.

 

These amendments are in accordance with the recommendations and advice received from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee), having regard to the definition of critically endangered, endangered and vulnerable ecological communities in section 182 of the EPBC Act.

 

The Committee’s recommendations regarding these ecological communities are set out in Attachment A.

 

In deciding to include these ecological communities in the list, I did not consider any matter that does not relate to the survival of these ecological communities.

 

Consultation on the nominations to amend the list of threatened ecological communities was undertaken when these communities were initially listed.  Further consultation on this instrument was not undertaken as the purpose of this instrument is to restore the list of threatened ecological communities as it existed prior to the deletion of these communities from the list due to the operation of section 32 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.  Therefore, it is considered that this instrument does not substantially alter the arrangements that were in place prior to that repeal.

 

This instrument is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

 

The instrument commenced on the day after it was registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

 

 


Attachment A

 

Recommendations of the Threatened Species Scientific Committee

 

  1. Mabi Forest (Complex Notophyll Vine Forest 5b)

 

Based on evidence presented in the nomination and submitted by other experts in the field of ecological communities, the Committee determined that this community is eligible for listing as critically endangered under the Act.  The community meets four criteria in the Act and Regulations.

Criterion 1:  Decline in geographic distribution is very severe;

Criterion 2:  The geographic distribution is very restricted and the nature of its distribution makes it likely that the action of a threatening process could cause it to be lost in the immediate future;

Criterion 3:  For a population of a native species that is likely to play a major role in the community, there is a very severe decline to the extent that restoration of the community is not likely to be possible in the immediate future; and

Criterion 4:  The reduction in its integrity across most of its geographic distribution is very severe as indicated by degradation of the community or its habitat, or disruption of important community processes, that is very severe.

 

On this basis, the Committee recommends that the ecological community Mabi Forest (Complex Notophyll Vine Forest 5b), be listed as critically endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

 

On the basis of the advice of the Committee, I am satisfied that the ecological community is eligible to be included in the critically endangered category.

 

2.        Swamps of the Fleurieu Peninsula

 

Based on evidence presented in the nomination and submitted by other experts in the field of ecological communities, the Committee determined that this community is eligible for listing as critically endangered under the Act.  The community meets two criteria in the Act and Regulations.

Criterion 1:  Decline in geographic distribution is substantial.

Criterion 2:  The geographic distribution is very restricted and the nature of its distribution makes it likely that the action of a threatening process could cause it to be lost in the immediate future.

 

On this basis, the Committee recommends that the ecological community Swamps of the Fleurieu Peninsula, be listed as critically endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

 

On the basis of the advice of the Committee, I am satisfied that the ecological community is eligible to be included in the critically endangered category.

 

3.        Bluegrass (Dichanthium spp.) Dominant Grasslands of the Brigalow Belt Bioregions (North and South)

 

Based on evidence presented in the nomination and submitted by other experts in the field of ecological communities, the Committee determined that this community is eligible for listing as endangered under the EPBC Act.  The community meets two criteria in the EPBC Act and Regulations.

Criterion 1: Decline in geographic distribution

Criterion 2: Small geographic distribution coupled with demonstrable threat

 

On this basis, the Committee recommends that the ecological community, Bluegrass (Dichanthium spp.) Dominant Grasslands of the Brigalow Belt Bioregions (North and South),  be listed as endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

 

On the basis of the advice of the Committee, I am satisfied that the ecological community is eligible to be included in the endangered category.

 

4.      Brigalow (Acacia harpophylla Dominant and Co-dominant)

 

Based on evidence presented in the nomination and submitted by other experts in the field of ecological communities, the Committee determined that this community is eligible for listing as endangered under the EPBC Act.  The community meets three criteria in the EPBC Act and Regulations.

Criterion 1: Decline in geographic distribution

Criterion 2: Small geographic distribution coupled with demonstrable threat

Criterion 5: Rate of continuing detrimental change

 

On this basis, the Committee recommends that the ecological community, Brigalow (Acacia harpophylla Dominant and Co-dominant), be listed as endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

 

On the basis of the advice of the Committee, I am satisfied that the ecological community is eligible to be included in the endangered category.

 

5. Semi-evergreen Vine Thickets of the Brigalow Belt (North and South) and Nandewar Bioregions

 

Based on evidence presented in the nomination and submitted by other experts in the field of ecological communities, the Committee determined that this community is eligible for listing as endangered under the EPBC Act.  The community meets two criteria in the EPBC Act and Regulations.

Criterion 1: Decline in geographic distribution

Criterion 2: Small geographic distribution coupled with demonstrable threat

 

On this basis, the Committee recommends that the ecological community, Semi-evergreen Vine Thickets of the Brigalow Belt (North and South) and Nandewar Bioregions, be listed as endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

 

This recommendation subsumes the ecological community, Semi-evergreen Vine Thickets of the Brigalow Belt South Bioregion in the New South Wales, that was listed as endangered under the EPBC Act.

 

On the basis of the advice of the Committee, I am satisfied that the ecological community is eligible to be included in the endangered category.

 

6.        Shale/Sandstone Transition Forest

 

Based on evidence presented in the nomination and submitted by other experts in the field of ecological communities, the Committee determined that this community is eligible for listing as endangered under the EPBC Act.  The community meets two criteria in the EPBC Act and Regulations. 

Criterion 1: Decline in geographic distribution

Criterion 2: Small geographic distribution coupled with demonstrable threat

 

On this basis, the Committee recommends that the ecological community, Shale/Sandstone Transition Forest be listed as endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

 

On the basis of the advice of the Committee, I am satisfied that the ecological community is eligible to be included in the endangered category.

 

7.        The Community of Native Species Dependent on Natural Discharge of Groundwater from the Great Artesian Basin

 

Based on evidence presented in the nomination and submitted by other experts in the field of ecological communities, the Committee determined that this community is eligible for listing as endangered under the EPBC Act.  The community meets three criteria in the EPBC Act and Regulations. 

Criterion 1: Decline in geographic distribution

Criterion 2: Small geographic distribution coupled with demonstrable threat

Criterion 4: Reduction in community integrity

 

On this basis, the Committee recommends that The Community of Native Species Dependent on Natural Discharge of Groundwater from the Great Artesian Basin be listed as endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

 

On the basis of the advice of the Committee, I am satisfied that the ecological community is eligible to be included in the endangered category.

 

8. Eucalyptus ovata – Callitris oblonga Forest

 

Based on evidence presented in the nomination and submitted by experts in the field, the Committee determined that this community is eligible for listing as Vulnerable under the Act.  The ecological community meets three criteria in the Act and EPBC Regulations.

Criterion 2: The geographic distribution is very restricted and is subject to demonstrable and ongoing demonstrable threats.

Criterion 3: It faces the loss or significant decline of a key species in the ecological community.

Criterion 4: Its integrity is being substantially reduced across most of its geographic range.

 

On this basis, the Committee recommends that the ecological community Eucalyptus ovata – Callitris oblonga Forest, be listed as vulnerable under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.

 

On the basis of the advice of the Committee, I am satisfied that the ecological community is eligible to be included in the vulnerable category.

 

Overview

The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) was enacted to address the need for a comprehensive framework to protect and conserve Australia's biodiversity. This legislation was introduced by the Australian Parliament to provide a national approach to the conservation of threatened species, ecological communities, and key threatening processes. The Act aims to ensure that biodiversity is protected and managed in a sustainable manner, recognising the role of the Commonwealth in safeguarding Australia's unique natural heritage. The Environment and Heritage Legislation Amendment Act Regulation 2007, issued under the authority of the Minister for the Environment and Water Resources, was designed to amend the list of threatened ecological communities under the EPBC Act. These regulations address transitional matters arising from the Environment and Heritage Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2006 and aim to restore the list of threatened ecological communities as it existed prior to their deletion due to the operation of section 32 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The policy objective of these regulations is to maintain the integrity of the list of threatened ecological communities, ensuring that critical habitats and species receive the necessary protection.

Scope and Application

The Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 applies to all persons and entities within the Commonwealth of Australia, including individuals, corporations, and government bodies. It aims to protect and conserve threatened species, ecological communities, and mitigate key threatening processes. The Act has national jurisdiction and its obligations extend to all actions that may impact listed threatened species or ecological communities, regardless of where they occur within Australia. The Act includes provisions for exclusions and exemptions, such as through the issuance of approval or authorisation, which can be subject to conditions to ensure compliance with its conservation objectives. The Act’s application can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as regulations or guidelines, which may detail specific processes or criteria for the protection of certain species or communities. The Environment and Heritage Legislation Amendment Act Regulation 2007 amends the list of threatened ecological communities to restore the list to its status prior to the repeal of certain items, reflecting recommendations from the Threatened Species Scientific Committee based on criteria for ecological community status.

Key Provisions

The Environment and Heritage Legislation Amendment Act Regulation 2007 amends the list of threatened ecological communities under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) (sections 184(1)(a) and (b)). Specifically, it includes several ecological communities in the critically endangered, endangered, and vulnerable categories and removes one community from the endangered category. The amendments follow the recommendations of the Threatened Species Scientific Committee, considering the criteria outlined in section 182 of the EPBC Act. The obligations imposed by the EPBC Act on parties or entities involve the protection and conservation of threatened species, ecological communities, and the mitigation of key threatening processes. The Act requires that any actions which may harm these species or communities are assessed to ensure they do not result in significant harm to the environment. This includes requiring approvals for actions that may affect listed threatened species or communities, and ensuring that any approvals are based on comprehensive environmental impact assessments. Breaches of the EPBC Act may lead to both civil and criminal consequences. Civil penalties can include fines for individuals and corporations, with the exact amount determined by the severity and nature of the offence. For example, the maximum penalty for an individual found guilty of an offence under the Act can be up to $1.1 million or imprisonment for up to five years, or both. Similarly, corporations can face fines of up to $5.5 million. Criminal penalties are typically imposed when the offence is of a more serious nature, such as causing significant harm to listed threatened species or communities. The Act provides for the enforcement of these penalties through the courts, ensuring that those who breach its provisions face appropriate consequences for their actions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Environmental Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Enforcement Powers
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.