Higher Education Support Legislation Amendment (Managed Growth Funding System) Instrument 2025

Administered by Department of Education

Legislation au F2025L01656 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Issued by the authority of the Minister for Education

Higher Education Support Act 2003

Higher Education Support Legislation Amendment (Managed Growth Funding System) Instrument 2025

AUTHORITY

Section 238-10 of the Higher Education Support Act 2003 (the Act) provides that the Minister for Education (Minister) may make guidelines for the purposes of the Act. In particular, item 2 of the table at section 238-10 specifies that the Minister may make the Commonwealth Grant Scheme Guidelines in order to carry out, or give effect to, the matters set out in Part 2-2 of the Act. In addition, item 8 of the table specifies that the Minister may make the Other Grants Guidelines to, amongst other things, provide for matters necessary or convenient to be provided in order to carry out or give effect to Part 2-3 of the Act in relation to grants payable under that Part.

Under subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations, or by laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument. The amendments to the Commonwealth Grant Scheme Guidelines 2020 (CGS Guidelines) and the Higher Education Support (Other Grants) Guidelines 2022 (Other Grants Guidelines) made by the Higher Education Support Legislation Amendment (Managed Growth Funding System) Instrument 2025 (Amendment Instrument) rely on this provision.

PURPOSE AND OPERATION

The Amendment Instrument amends the CGS Guidelines and the Other Grants Guidelines in response to funding reforms for the higher education sector to build a better and fairer tertiary education system and ensure its long-term viability. New funding arrangements under Part 2-2 of the Act, referred to as the managed growth funding system (MGFS), will commence in 2027 and the Amendment Instrument provides certain grants to eligible providers during the transition period in 2026 to assist them with the changeover.

Amendments to the CGS Guidelines

Firstly, the Amendment Instrument updates the list of providers at section 8 of the CGS Guidelines to include additional non-Table A providers who are eligible to apply and receive additional commencing Commonwealth supported places (CSPs) in critical skill areas under Part 2-2 of the Act. It also makes amendments to include a new national priority, in relation to which grants to these providers can be paid. Under the MGFS, to increase diversity of providers providing CSPs, the Government has invested an additional $32.8 million from 2026 to 2028 to provide 365 additional commencing CSPs each year for non-Table A providers in critical skill areas from 1 January 2026. The amendments enable payment of this funding under Part 2-2 of the Act.

Secondly, the Amendment Instrument amends Chapter 7 of the CGS Guidelines to include a new formula for Transition Fund Loading for 2026 that is payable to Table A providers. The existing funding arrangements for CSPs will begin transitioning to the new MGFS from 1 January 2026. The new Transition Fund Loading formula will ensure that Table A providers will receive at least the same amount of government funding (in nominal terms) for relevant programs under the Act in 2026 as they did in 2025. The Transition Fund Loading will ensure that no Table A provider is financially worse-off in nominal terms during the 2026 transition year compared to 2025.

Finally, the Amendment Instrument makes changes to the way medical student loading is calculated to reflect changes to be made to the Act by the Education Legislation Amendment (Integrity and Other Measures) Act 2025 (Integrity Measures Act). The changes to the CGS Guidelines ensure there is no limit or cap on the amount of medical student loading applicable to students who are Indigenous persons.

In the 2025-26 Budget, the Government announced that CSPs in medical degrees for Indigenous students will be uncapped from 1 January 2026. Amendments have been made to the way medical student loading is calculated under the CGS Guidelines, which is currently capped based on the number of medical CSPs allocated to the relevant provider in their funding agreement (entered into under Part 2-2 of the Act). The revised method for calculating medical student loading will ensure eligible Table A providers receive funding for all Commonwealth-supported Indigenous persons enrolled in their medical degrees. 

Amendments to the Other Grants Guidelines

The Amendment Instrument also amends the Other Grants Guidelines to specify a new program under which grants can be made, being the Transitional Funding Floor Guarantee Program. This program will provide financial assistance to Table A providers in 2026 to transition to the MGFS from 2027 and ensure that Table A providers can continue to operate, employ staff and provide quality education services during this transition period.

The Transitional Funding Floor Guarantee Program provides a grant to eligible higher education providers of any shortfall between the sum of the amounts the provider was entitled to be paid for 2025 in relation to the total basic grant amount calculated under subsection 33-5(1) of the Act and the Higher Education Continuity Guarantee – Equity (HECG-Equity) program specified in Division 2 of Part 8 of the Other Grants Guidelines, and the total basic grant amount calculated under subsection 33-5(1) of the Act for 2026. This ensures that providers have continuity in the funding arrangements during the transition period.

The Amendment Instrument also makes a minor change to the HECG-Equity program to clarify that grant funds must be expended in accordance with any timeframes specified in conditions that are made in writing by the Minister under subsection 41-25(2) of the Act. This provides flexibility for grant recipients when expending the grant funds, to account for any system or administrative processes that may have an impact on the provider.  

COMMENCEMENT

The Amendment Instrument commences the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislation.

CONSULTATION 

The Australian Universities Accord Final Report (the Accord) recommended that universities should be supported through a glidepath to full implementation of the new funding framework as the sector transitions from the current funding system based on a capped dollar amount (i.e. the maximum basic grant amount) to the new funding model based on places and the relevant study load of students in those places (i.e. Equivalent Full-time Student Load (EFTSL)). Where current funding programs change, the Accord’s Final Report noted that care should be taken to avoid affecting quality activities that are being delivered under current funding arrangements (recommendation 46). The Accord also noted that from 2026, any reduction in overall Commonwealth funding for individual universities should be in moderated and controlled manner.

The Accord’s Final Report also considered that every provider should be given a funding floor to support those providers who have to manage higher levels of fluctuation in demand (for example, regional and new higher education providers), and to ensure a stable planning environment for providers to make progress against their mission and public good objectives.

The amendments to establish the Transition Fund Loading in the CGS Guidelines and the Transitional Funding Floor Guarantee program in the Other Grants Guidelines as outlined in the Amendment Instrument are consistent with the findings of Accord.

The amendment to the method for calculating medical student loading in the CGS Guidelines complements amendments to the Act made by the Integrity Measures Act to uncap CSPs in medical degrees for Indigenous students who apply and meet entry requirements. The Integrity Measures Act was subject to inquiry by the Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee, which invited submissions and in its report of 24 November 2025 outlined broad support for this measure. Noting this support, it was considered that broad consultation on the related amendments to medical student loading was not required.

The proposed change to the HECG-Equity program is in line with information already communicated to providers, and published on the Department of Education’s website.

 


STATEMENT OF COMPATIBILITY WITH HUMAN RIGHTS

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

Higher Education Support Legislation Amendment (Managed Growth Funding System) Instrument 2025

The Higher Education Support Legislation Amendment (Managed Growth Funding System) Instrument 2025 (Amendment Instrument) is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

The Amendment Instrument amends the Commonwealth Grant Scheme Guidelines 2020 (CGS Guidelines) and the Higher Education Support (Other Grants) Guidelines 2022 (Other Grants Guidelines) in response to funding reforms for the higher education sector to build a better and fairer tertiary education system and ensure its long-term viability. New funding arrangements under Part 2-2 of the Higher Education Support Act 2003 (the Act), referred to as the managed growth funding system (MGFS), will commence in 2027 and the Amendment Instrument provides certain grants to eligible providers during the transition period in 2026 to assist them with the changeover.

Amendments to the CGS Guidelines

Firstly, the Amendment Instrument updates the list of providers at section 8 of the CGS Guidelines to include additional non-Table A providers who are eligible to apply and receive additional commencing Commonwealth supported places (CSPs) in critical skill areas under Part 2-2 of the Act. It also makes amendments to include a new national priority, in relation to which grants to these providers can be paid. Under the MGFS, to increase diversity of providers providing CSPs, the Government has invested an additional $32.8 million from 2026 to 2028 to provide 365 additional commencing CSPs each year for non-Table A providers in critical skill areas from 1 January 2026. The amendments enable payment of this funding under Part 2-2 of the Act.

Secondly, the Amendment Instrument amends Chapter 7 of the CGS Guidelines to include a new formula for Transition Fund Loading for 2026 that is payable to Table A providers. The existing funding arrangements for CSPs will begin transitioning to the new MGFS from 1 January 2026. The new Transition Fund Loading formula will ensure that Table A providers will receive at least the same amount of government funding (in nominal terms) for relevant programs under the Act in 2026 as they did in 2025. The Transition Fund Loading will ensure that no Table A provider is financially worse-off in nominal terms during the 2026 transition year compared to 2025.

Finally, the Amendment Instrument makes changes to the way medical student loading is calculated to reflect changes to be made to the Act by the Education Legislation Amendment (Integrity and Other Measures) Act 2025. The changes to the CGS Guidelines ensure there is no limit or cap on the amount of medical student loading applicable to students who are Indigenous persons.

In the 2025-26 Budget, the Government announced that CSPs in medical degrees for Indigenous students will be uncapped from 1 January 2026. Amendments have been made to the way medical student loading is calculated under the CGS Guidelines, which is currently capped based on the number of medical CSPs allocated to the relevant provider in their funding agreement (entered into under Part 2-2 of the Act). The revised method for calculating medical student loading will ensure eligible Table A providers receive funding for all Commonwealth-supported Indigenous persons enrolled in their medical degrees. 

Amendments to the Other Grants Guidelines

The Amendment Instrument also amends the Other Grants Guidelines to specify a new program under which grants can be made, being the Transitional Funding Floor Guarantee Program. This program will provide financial assistance to Table A providers in 2026 to transition to the MGFS from 2027 and ensure that Table A providers can continue to operate, employ staff and provide quality education services during this transition period.

The Transitional Funding Floor Guarantee Program provides a grant to eligible higher education providers of any shortfall between the sum of the amounts the provider was entitled to be paid for 2025 in relation to the total basic grant amount calculated under subsection 33-5(1) of the Act and the Higher Education Continuity Guarantee – Equity (HECG-Equity) program specified in Division 2 of Part 8 of the Other Grants Guidelines, and the total basic grant amount calculated under subsection 33-5(1) of the Act for 2026. This ensures that providers have continuity in the funding arrangements during the transition period.

The Amendment Instrument also makes a minor change to the HECG-Equity program to clarify that grant funds must be expended in accordance with any timeframes specified in conditions that are made in writing by the Minister for Education under subsection 41-25(2) of the Act. This provides flexibility for grant recipients when expending the grant funds, to account for any system or administrative processes that may have an impact on the provider. 

Human rights implications

The Amendment Instrument engages the right to education in Article 13 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).

Right to education

Article 13 of the ICESCR recognises the important personal, societal, economic and intellectual benefits of education. Article 13 also provides that secondary education in all its different forms, including higher education, shall be made generally available and accessible to all by every appropriate means. Article 13(2)(c) of the ICESCR provides that ‘higher education shall be made equally accessible to all, on the basis of capacity, by every appropriate means, and in particular by the progressive introduction of free education’.

The Amendment Instrument amends the CGS Guidelines and the Other Grants Guidelines to support eligible providers through the transition to a new funding model, the MGFS, from 2027. The funding reforms are necessary to ensure the future growth and viability of Australia’s higher education sector, to attract students (regardless of their background) to have the best opportunities to engage in higher education and to give security, stability and certainty to providers and their employees to enable them to continue delivering quality education services to their students and communities.

Specifically, the Amendment Instrument specifies a new formula for Transition Fund Loading in the CGS Guidelines, payable to Table A providers, and a new Transitional Funding Floor Guarantee program in the Other Grants Guidelines to ensure that there is no reduction in Commonwealth funding in 2026 and so providers can continue to operate, employ staff and provide quality education services and make progress against their mission and public good objectives. The amendment to the HECG-Equity program in the Other Grants Guidelines also clarifies that funding under HECG-Equity remains available for providers to use within a specified time period to support under-represented or disadvantaged students access higher education and succeed. These amendments promote the right to education by ensuring that access to higher education can continue to be available and accessible.

The Amendment Instrument also supports the right to education by uncapping medical student loading for those students who are Indigenous persons. This amendment aims to incentivise providers and reduce barriers for Indigenous persons, therefore encouraging more enrolments into courses of study in medicine, and pursuit of that study.  

Conclusion

The Amendment Instrument is compatible with human rights because it supports the right to education.

 

Minister for Education, the Hon Jason Clare MP

 

Higher Education Support LEGISLATION Amendment (MANAGED GROWTH FUNDING SYSTEM) INSTRUMENT 2025

EXPLANATION OF PROVISIONS

Section 1: Name

  1.       This provision specifies the name of the instrument as the Higher Education Support Legislation Amendment (Managed Growth Funding System) Instrument 2025 (Amendment Instrument).

Section 2: Commencement

  1.       This section provides that the Amendment Instrument commences the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislation.

Section 3: Authority

  1.       This section provides that the Amendment Instrument is made under section 238-10 of the Higher Education Support Act 2003 (the Act).

Section 4: Schedules

  1.       This is a technical provision that explains that each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to the Amendment Instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this instrument has effect according to its terms.


Schedule 1—Amendments to the Commonwealth Grant Scheme Guidelines 2020

Commonwealth Grant Scheme Guidelines 2020

Item 1: Section 4 (definitions)

  1.       This item inserts a new definition for the term “Other Grants Guidelines” in the Commonwealth Grant Scheme Guidelines 2020 (CGS Guidelines). The term is defined to mean the Higher Education Support (Other Grants) Guidelines 2022 (Other Grants Guidelines) as that document is in force from time to time.
  2.       This term is defined because the new formula for the Transition Fund Loading being inserted in section 19 of the CGS Guidelines by the Amendment Instrument, refers to programs that are specified in the Other Grants Guidelines. Section 14 of the Legislation Act 2003 enables the Other Grants Guidelines to be incorporated from time to time because the Other Grants Guidelines is a disallowable legislative instrument and this is necessary to capture amendments to the Other Grants Guidelines specifying new programs.

Items 2, 3, 4 and 5: Paragraphs 8(l), (s), (zy) and (zz)

  1.       These items amend paragraphs 8(l), (s) and (zy) of the CGS Guidelines to make technical amendments to refer to the correct names of Alphacrucis University College Limited and Excelsia University College. These providers will now be eligible to receive funding for Commonwealth supported places (CSPs) following a recent process run by Government to provide 365 additional commencing CSPs each year for non-Table A providers in critical skill areas from 1 January 2026.
  2.       The items also make some minor consequential changes (like removing full stops and ‘and’) to reflect that an additional higher education provider will be listed in this section (see item 6).

Item 6: After paragraph 8(zz)

  1.       This item inserts a new paragraph 8(zza) into the list of providers eligible to receive funding under Part 2-2 of the Act, being The National Institute of Dramatic Art. This provider will now be eligible to receive funding for CSPs following a recent process run by Government to provide 365 additional commencing CSPs each year for non-Table A providers in critical skill areas from 1 January 2026.

Item 7: Paragraph 10(a)

  1.   This item replaces the existing national priority included in paragraph 10(a) of the CGS Guidelines with a new national priority. The new national priority is ‘increasing the number of persons undertaking courses of study in the following areas of study reflecting industries that are experiencing skills shortages or are highly specialised: Behavioural Science, Education, Allied Health, Other Health, Built Environment, Computing, Visual and Performing Arts, Professional Pathway Psychology, Professional Pathway Social Work, Nursing, Engineering, Agriculture.’
  2.   It is necessary to include this new national priority in the CGS Guidelines to enable non-Table A providers to receive funding for CSPs in critical skill areas from 1 January 2026. Providers that are not Table A providers can only enrol students in CSPs if the unit of study in which the student is enrolling in, is within a national priority (see paragraph 36-10(5)(a) of the Act).

Item 8: Paragraph 12(a)

  1.   This item repeals existing paragraph 12(a) of the CGS Guidelines and replaces it with a new paragraph (a) which provides that the medical student loading for a provider for Commonwealth supported ‘medical student EFTSL’ (as worked out under section 12) is $1,786 per student in 2026, indexed in accordance with Part 5-6 of the Act for future years.
  2.   The changes made to this paragraph update terminology to refer to ‘medical student EFTSL’ and remove references to allocation of medical student places. These changes are necessary to reflect that the number of medical student places for students who are Indigenous persons will no longer be allocated to a provider due to changes made to the Act by the Education Legislation Amendment (Integrity and Other Measures) Act 2025, i.e. there will no longer be a cap on the number of Indigenous students who can enrol in courses of study in medicine.
  3.   This paragraph has also been updated to refer to the amount of medical student loading payable per student in 2026 and in future years.

Item 9: Paragraph 12(c)

  1.   This item repeals paragraph 12(c) of the CGS Guidelines and replaces it with a new paragraph (c) which provides that the number of medical student EFTSL for the purposes of determining medical student loading for a particular year is equal to the number of medical student EFTSL enrolled with the provider for that year as reported by the provider through the Higher Education Student Data Collection (HESDC) and cleared as final by the Department of Education (department).
  2.   The changes to this paragraph are minor and align the number of medical student EFTSL that attract medical student loading to the number of students a provider enrolled for that year, based on enrolment data the provider reports through the HESDC which has then been cleared as final by the department. This means medical student loading entitlements will be calculated in arrears. The amendment also removes the word ‘allocated’ to reflect that the number of medical student places for students who are Indigenous persons will no longer be allocated to a provider.

 

Item 10: Paragraph 12(d)

  1.   This item repeals paragraph 12(d) of the CGS Guidelines and replaces it with a new paragraph (d) which provides that the number of medical student EFTSL for students other than Indigenous persons, taken into account for the purposes of determining medical student loading for a particular year, must not be more than the number of Commonwealth supported medical places allocated in that provider’s CGS funding agreement for that year.
  2.   This amendment ensures that all medical students who are Indigenous persons will be taken into account for the purposes of calculating the medical student loading payable to a provider. However, for students who are non-Indigenous persons, only the number of medical EFTSL up to the number of medical student places allocated in the provider’s CGS funding agreement for the relevant year will be taken into account when working out the provider’s medical student loading for that year.

Item 11: Section 19

  1.   This item repeals section 19 of the CGS Guidelines and substitutes it with a new formula for working out the Transition Fund Loading for a Table A provider for 2026. The new formula provides that the amount of transition fund loading payable to a Table A provider for 2026 is “Max minus Core Funding”.
  2.   Max is the sum of the amounts that the provider was entitled to be paid for 2025 in relation to the total basic grant amount (calculated under subsection 33-5(1) of the Act) and more commonly known as the Commonwealth Grant Scheme (CGS), and certain grant programs specified in the Other Grants Guidelines.
  3.   Core funding is the sum of the amounts that the provider was entitled to be paid for 2026 in relation to the total basic grant amount (calculated under subsection 33-5(1) of the Act) and certain grant programs specified in the Other Grants Guidelines.
  4.   For example:
    • In 2025, a Table A provider was entitled to be paid $100 for higher education courses, $100 for designated higher education courses, $100 for demand driven higher education courses (meaning a total of $300 for the provider’s total basic grant amount), plus $100 under the relevant grant programs specified in the Other Grant Guidelines. Therefore the ‘Max’ amount for that provider will be $400 ($100 + $100 + $100 + $100).
    • In 2026, the Table A provider is then entitled to be paid $50 for higher education courses, $100 for designated higher education courses, $50 for demand driven higher education courses (meaning a total of $200 for the provider’s total basic grant amount), plus $150 under the Needs-Based Funding Program and other grant programs specified in the Other Grants Guidelines. Therefore, the ‘Core funding’ amount will be $350 ($50 + $100 + $50 + $150).
    • Therefore, the Transition Fund Loading for the provider will be $50 ($400 - $350) for 2026.
  5.   The Transition Fund Loading will be a one-off ‘loading’ for eligible Table A providers and will only be applicable for 2026. The Transition Fund Loading will be calculated and paid to eligible Table A providers once 2026 actual enrolment data is verified and funding entitlements for the 2026 grant year have been reconciled.

Item 12: After section 22

  1.   This item inserts new section 23 at the end of Chapter 9 of the CGS Guidelines. Chapter 9 provides for the application, savings and transitional provisions relevant to changes made to the CGS Guidelines.
  2.   Section 23 is an application provision which provides that:
    • the amendments to section 12 (related to calculation of medical student loading) made by the Amendment Instrument apply in relation to the 2026 grant year and future grant years; and
    • section 12 of the CGS Guidelines, as in force immediately before the commencement of the Amendment Instrument, continues to apply on and after that commencement in relation to medical student loading in the calendar year 2025 and preceding years.

 

 

 


Schedule 2—Amendments to the Higher Education Support (Other Grants) Guidelines 2022
Higher Education Support (Other Grants) Guidelines 2022

Item 1: After section 59

  1.   This item inserts a new Part 7A after section 59 in the Other Grants Guidelines to specify the Transitional Funding Floor Guarantee as a program under which grants may be made in accordance with subsection 41-15(1) of the Act.
  2.   New section 59A outlines the program objectives. New subsection 59A(1) provides that the Transitional Funding Floor Guarantee is specified as a program for the purpose of supporting structural adjustment under item 9B of the table in subsection 41-10(1) of the Act.
  3.   New subsection 59A(2) provides that the objectives of the program are to:
    • at paragraph (a), provide financial assistance to Table A providers in 2026 to transition to new funding arrangements under Part 2-2 of the Act (referred to as the managed growth funding system) from 2027; and
    • at paragraph (b), ensure that Table A providers can continue to operate, employ staff and provide quality education services during this transition period.   
  4.   New section 59B provides for the extra conditions of eligibility for the program. Only Table A providers who have entered into a funding agreement under section 30-25 of Part 2-2 of the Act for 2026 are eligible for a grant under the program.
  5.   New section 59C provides that grants under the program are to be made in respect of a year.
  6.   New section 59D provides the method by which the amount of grants under the program are determined for a provider. The amount of transitional funding floor guarantee payable to a Table A provider for 2026 is ‘Max minus CGS Payments’.
  7.   The ‘max’ is the sum of the total basic grant amount (calculated under subsection 33-5(1) of the Act) and the Higher Education Continuity Guarantee – Equity (HECG-Equity) program (specified in the Other Grants Guidelines) the provider was entitled to be paid for 2025.  
  8.   The ‘CGS payments’ is the total basic grant amount (calculated under subsection 33-5(1) of the Act) the provider was entitled to be paid for 2026.
  9.   For example:
    • In 2025, a Table A provider is entitled to be paid $100 for higher education courses, $100 for designated higher education courses, $100 for demand driven higher education courses (meaning a total of $300 for the provider’s total basic grant amount), plus $50 in HECG-Equity payments. Therefore the ‘Max’ amount for that provider will be $350 ($100 + $100 + $100 + $50).
    • In 2026, the Table A provider is then entitled to receive $100 for higher education courses, $100 for designated higher education courses and $50 for demand driven higher education courses (meaning a total of $250 for the provider’s total basic grant amount). Therefore, the ‘CGS Payment’ Amount will be $250 ($100 + $100 + $50).
    • Therefore, the Transitional Funding Floor Guarantee program grant for the provider will be $100 ($350 - $250) for 2026.
  10.   New section 59E outlines the conditions that apply to grants under the program and provides that Table A providers must only use their grants for the program objectives set out in section 59A. The note under this section provides that the Minister for Education (Minister) may impose other conditions that apply to grants under section 41-25 of the Act.

Item 2: Subsection 63AE(6)

  1.   This item repeals subsection 63AE(6) and replaces it with a new subsection 63AE(6) in the Other Grants Guidelines. This new subsection provides that “the grant recipient must expend grant funds for a project under the program on initiatives that are consistent with subsection (2) and (3) in accordance with any timeframes specified in conditions imposed under subsection 41-25(2) of the Act”.
  2.   This amendment clarifies that grant funds for the HECG-Equity program specified in Division 2 of Part 8 to the Other Grants Guidelines, must be expended in accordance with any timeframes that are set by the Minister as a condition in relation to the grant determined in writing under subsection 41-25(2) of the Act. This change is necessary to provide flexibility for the Minister or his delegate to specify the timeframe in which HECG-Equity funding must be spent.

 

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.