EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Notice of revocation of approval as a provider on request by the provider
under subsection 22-40(1) the Higher Education Support Act 2003
Issued by the authority of the Minister for Education
Authority
Subsection 22-40(1) of the Higher Education Support Act 2003 (the Act) provides for the revocation of approval of a body as a higher education provider by the Minister if the body requests in writing that the Minister revoke its approval. Subsection 22-40(3) of the Act specifies that the Minister must cause the body to be notified of the revocation in writing at least 14 days before the day on which the revocation is to take effect.
Under paragraph 238-5(1)(b) of the Act, the Minister has delegated his powers under subsections 22‑40(1) and 22‑40(3) of the Act to an APS employee responsible for administering the Act.
Subsection 22-40(3A) of the Act stipulates that a notice of revocation under subsection 22-40(3) of the Act is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Purpose
This legislative instrument (the Instrument) revokes the approval of the Navitas College of Public Safety Pty Ltd (formerly Australian Institute of Public Safety) as a higher education provider under subsection 22-40(1) of the Act.
Background
Navitas College of Public Safety Pty Ltd was approved by the Minister’s delegate as a higher education provider by Notice of Approval No. T52-2004 on 12 November 2004, appearing in Gazette No. S 458 on 15 November 2004, pursuant to subsection 22‑40(1) of the Act.
On 25 August 2014, Navitas College of Public Safety Pty Ltd requested in writing that its approval as a higher education provider be revoked.
Commencement
The notice of revocation shall commence on 9 October 2014.
Consultation
Consultation was not undertaken and not considered necessary as Navitas College of Public Safety Pty Ltd has voluntarily requested revocation of its approval as a higher education provider for the purposes of FEE‑HELP and Navitas College of Public Safety Pty Ltd is the only higher education provider affected by the Instrument.
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
Notice of Revocation of approval as a provider on application
The Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the Legislative Instrument
The Instrument is made by the Minister under subsection 22-40(1) of the Act. The purpose of the Instrument is to revoke the approval of Navitas College of Public Safety Pty Ltd as a higher education provider for the purposes of FEE‑HELP under the Act. Under subsection 22-40(1) of the Act an approved higher education provider must request in writing that their approval be revoked.
Human rights implications
The Instrument engages the right to education, contained in Article 13 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. In particular, the Instrument has an effect on the provision of higher education by Navitas College of Public Safety Pty Ltd as it revokes its approval as a higher education provider for the purposes of FEE-HELP under the Act, removing its ability to offer FEE-HELP assistance to its eligible students.
The right to education is engaged, as the Instrument removed the approval of Navitas College of Public Safety Pty Ltd as a higher education provider for the purposes of FEE-HELP under the Act. However the right is unaffected as the revocation does not remove Navitas College of Public Safety Pty Ltd’s approval to deliver education and training to students.
Conclusion
This Instrument is compatible with human rights because it does not affect the protection of human rights.
Overview
The Higher Education Support Act 2003 (the Act) was enacted to provide a framework for the regulation of higher education providers, including mechanisms for the approval and revocation of such providers. One particular issue the Act addresses is the formal process by which an approved provider can request the revocation of its approval. The Explanatory Statement for the legislative instrument F2014L01270 outlines the revocation of approval for Navitas College of Public Safety Pty Ltd, formerly known as the Australian Institute of Public Safety, as a higher education provider under subsection 22-40(1) of the Act. This revocation follows a written request by the provider itself. The Minister for Education, exercising delegated powers under the Act, issued this revocation to ensure compliance with the legislative requirements, including notifying the provider at least 14 days before the revocation takes effect. The revocation does not affect the provider’s ability to deliver education and training, but it does remove its eligibility to offer FEE-HELP assistance to its students.
Scope and Application
The Higher Education Support Act 2003, through subsection 22-40(1), provides the framework for the revocation of approval of a body as a higher education provider, applicable to any entity that has been approved under the Act and requests revocation in writing. This particular legislative instrument targets Navitas College of Public Safety Pty Ltd, revoking its approval as a higher education provider for the purposes of FEE-HELP. The Minister for Education, who has the authority to revoke such approvals, has delegated these powers to an APS employee for administrative purposes, ensuring the revocation process is executed efficiently and in accordance with the Act. The revocation notice, which is a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, must be provided to the entity at least 14 days prior to the effective date of revocation, ensuring the entity has adequate time to prepare for the cessation of its approval status. This revocation does not affect the entity's general ability to provide education and training but specifically removes its eligibility to offer FEE-HELP assistance to its students.
Key Provisions
The Higher Education Support Act 2003 (the Act) contains provisions for the revocation of approval of a body as a higher education provider. Specifically, subsection 22-40(1) allows for the revocation of approval if the body requests it in writing. Subsection 22-40(3) requires the Minister to notify the body in writing at least 14 days before the revocation takes effect. The Minister has delegated the authority to administer these subsections to an Australian Public Service (APS) employee, as outlined in paragraph 238-5(1)(b) of the Act. Furthermore, subsection 22-40(3A) classifies the notice of revocation as a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Under the Act, the obligations for parties and entities revolve around the formal request and notification processes. For instance, if a higher education provider wishes to have its approval revoked, it must submit a written request to the Minister. Once a request is received, the Minister, or their delegate, must provide written notification to the provider at least 14 days before the revocation is set to take effect. This process ensures transparency and provides the provider with ample time to prepare for the changes resulting from the revocation.
Breaches or non-compliance with the Act can result in various consequences. Although the specific penalties are not detailed in the Explanatory Statement, the revocation itself serves as a significant administrative consequence for the provider. Additionally, there could be civil or criminal penalties for failing to comply with the notice requirements or for providing false information in the request for revocation. The precise penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, but they could include fines or other sanctions as prescribed by relevant legislation.
The revocation of approval for Navitas College of Public Safety Pty Ltd (formerly Australian Institute of Public Safety) under subsection 22-40(1) of the Act demonstrates the application of these provisions. The college was originally approved as a higher education provider on 12 November 2004. Following a written request on 25 August 2014, the Minister revoked its approval, effective from 9 October 2014. This case highlights the importance of the formal request and notification processes mandated by the Act. The Minister's delegate acted within the legal framework to ensure that the college was duly informed of the revocation, maintaining the integrity of the higher education system.