EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Notice of revocation of approval under section 22-20 of the Higher Education Support Act 2003
Issued by the authority of the Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations
Subject: Higher Education Support Act 2003 (HESA)
Revocation of approval of a body as a higher education provider under section
22-10(3) of HESA
Notice of revocation of approval under subsection 22-20(3) of HESA
Authority
Section 22-10(3) of the Higher Education Support Act 2003 (HESA) provides for the revocation of approval of a body as a higher education provider by the Minister if the body was a non
self-accrediting entity at the last time the body became a higher education provider; and since that time, the body has ceased to be a non self-accrediting entity.
Subsection 22-25(1)(b) of HESA provides for a determination by the Minister that revocation of a body’s approval as a higher education provider is of no effect for the purposes of assistance payable to the body’s students who have not completed the courses of study in which they were enrolled with the body on the day specified in the notice of revocation of approval under subsection 22-20(5)(a) of HESA.
Under section 238-5 of HESA the Minister has delegated his powers under section 22-10(3) and subsection 22-25(1)(b) of HESA to any person holding the position of Branch Manager of the Tertiary Student Support Branch in the Skills Group of the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
Subsection 22-35(1) of HESA stipulates that a notice of revocation under section 22-20(3) is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Purpose
The Minister considered the written submission made by East Coast Gestalt Training Incorporated on
12 August 2011, in making the decision to revoke the body’s approval as a higher education provider, in accordance with subsection 22-20(2) of HESA.
This legislative instrument revokes the approval of East Coast Gestalt Training Incorporated as a higher education provider under section 22-10(3) of HESA as the body has ceased to be a non self-accrediting entity.
This legislative instrument also includes a determination made by the Minister under subsection
22-25(1)(b), that this notice of revocation is of no effect for the purposes of assistance payable to the body’s students, who have not completed the courses of study in which they were enrolled with the body, on the date to which this revocation is to take effect.
Background
East Coast Gestalt Training Incorporated was approved by the Minister as a non self-accrediting higher education provider on 8 February 2005, by Instrument of Approval No 2 of 2005 registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments on 11 February 2005 (F2005L00273).
Subsection 16-25(b)(iii) of HESA provides that the Minister may approve a body corporate as a higher education provider if the body is a non self-accrediting entity. Schedule 1 of HESA defines a non
self-accrediting entity as a body corporate that is listed on the Australian Qualifications Framework Register.
East Coast Gestalt Training Incorporated has ceased to be a non self-accrediting entity as the body’s name has ceased to be included in the Australian Qualification Framework Register.
Commencement
In accordance with subsection 22-20(5)(a) of HESA, a notice issued by the Minister to revoke a body’s approval as a higher education provider must include the date to which the revocation is to take effect.
This notice of revocation shall commence on 22 November 2011.
Consultation
External consultation was not undertaken and was not considered necessary as East Coast Gestalt Training Incorporated is the only body that is having its approval as a higher education provider revoked by this instrument, and therefore is the only body affected by this instrument.
The Minister has complied with the requirements of section 22-20 of HESA in affording the body procedural fairness.
Overview
The Higher Education Support Act 2003 (HESA) was enacted to provide a framework for supporting higher education in Australia, including the regulation of higher education providers. This legislation was introduced to address the need for a structured approach to the accreditation and regulation of higher education institutions, ensuring quality and integrity in the sector. The Act was enacted by the Parliament of Australia and its policy objective includes maintaining standards and supporting students within the higher education system. One aspect of this regulation involves the revocation of approval for higher education providers who no longer meet the criteria, such as transitioning from a non self-accrediting entity status. The Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations has the authority to revoke such approvals, ensuring compliance with the legislative requirements and protecting the interests of students.
Scope and Application
The Higher Education Support Act 2003 (HESA) applies to entities approved as higher education providers, specifically those that are non self-accrediting entities listed on the Australian Qualifications Framework Register. The Act allows the Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations to revoke the approval of such entities if they cease to meet the criteria for being a non self-accrediting entity. This revocation applies Commonwealth-wide, affecting the ability of the entity to provide higher education services and access associated funding and support mechanisms. The revocation instrument issued under this Act specifies the effective date of the revocation and includes a determination that the revocation will not affect the provision of assistance to students who were enrolled in courses with the entity at the time of revocation. This legislative instrument is a specific application of the powers granted under HESA and is subject to the procedures outlined in the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.
Key Provisions
The Higher Education Support Act 2003 (HESA) provides that the Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills, Jobs and Workplace Relations has the authority to revoke the approval of a body as a higher education provider under section 22-10(3) if the body, at the time of its most recent approval, was a non self-accrediting entity and has since ceased to be one. This revocation is formalised through a notice issued under subsection 22-20(3) of the Act. Additionally, subsection 22-25(1)(b) allows the Minister to determine that such a revocation notice has no effect on the assistance payable to students who have not completed their courses on the specified effective date. These powers are delegated by section 238-5 of HESA to the Branch Manager of the Tertiary Student Support Branch in the Skills Group of the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. A notice of revocation is considered a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 as per subsection 22-35(1) of HESA.
The obligations imposed by the Act on entities like East Coast Gestalt Training Incorporated include maintaining their status as a non self-accrediting entity, as defined in Schedule 1 of HESA, which requires inclusion on the Australian Qualifications Framework Register. Any entity approved as a higher education provider must remain compliant with the criteria set out in the Act to retain its approval. The Minister is required to afford procedural fairness to the entity in question, as mandated by section 22-20 of HESA, ensuring that any decision to revoke approval is made following due process and proper consultation where necessary.
In terms of penalties and consequences, the Act does not explicitly outline specific penalties for non-compliance with the revocation provisions. However, the revocation of approval as a higher education provider can have significant implications for the entity, including the loss of eligibility to provide courses and the cessation of government assistance for students enrolled with the entity. For students, the impact may be mitigated by the Minister's determination under subsection 22-25(1)(b), which can ensure continued assistance for those who have not yet completed their courses on the effective date of the revocation. The Act, therefore, ensures that while there are formal consequences for entities that fall out of compliance, measures are in place to protect the interests of students.