Higher Education Provider Approval No. 5 of 2013

Administered by Department of Education

Legislation au F2013L01776 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Approval and Notice of Approval under section 16-25 and subsection 16-50(1)

of the Higher Education Support Act 2003

 

Higher Education Provider Approval No. 5 of 2013

 

Issued by the authority of the Minister for Education

 

Authority

Section 1625 of Higher Education Support Act 2003 (the Act) provides for the approval of bodies as Higher Education Providers by the Minister. Paragraph 1650(1)(a) of the Act provides that the Minister must decide an application for approval as a Higher Education Provider and under paragraph 1650(1)(b) cause the applicant to be notified in writing whether or not the applicant is approved as a Higher Education Provider.

Under section 238-5 of the Act the Minister has delegated his powers under section 1625 and subsection 1650(1) of the Act to an APS employee responsible for administering the Act.

Subsection 16-55(1) of the Act stipulates that a notice of approval under paragraph 1650(1)(b) of the Act is a legislative instrument.

Purpose

This instrument:

  1. approves Investment Banking Institute Business School Pty Ltd (ACN: 142 988 921  ABN: 46 142 988921) as a Higher Education Provider under section 1625 of the Act;
  2. decides the application of Investment Banking Institute Business School Pty Ltd for the purposes of paragraph 1650(1)(a) of the Act; and
  3. gives Investment Banking Institute Business School Pty Ltd notice of that approval for the purposes of paragraph 1650(1)(b) of the Act.

 

Commencement

In accordance with subsection 1655(2) of the Act and paragraph 12(1)(d) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, the notice and the decision to approve Investment Banking Institute Business School Pty Ltd as a Higher Education Provider take effect on the day after the notice is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

Consultation

Consultation was not undertaken and was not considered necessary in this case because the notice confers a benefit on Investment Banking Institute Business School Pty Ltd and this body is the only body affected by the notice.  This notice will not have a direct or substantial indirect effect on business, nor will it restrict competition.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

 

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

Notice of Approval

 

This Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

 

The Instrument is made by the Minister under section 1625(1), paragraph 1650(1)(b) and subsection 1655(1) of the Act. The purpose of the Instrument is to approve Investment Banking Institute Business School Pty Ltd as a Higher Education provider for the purposes of FEEHELP assistance under the Act. For approval as a Higher Education Provider the Minister must be satisfied that the body meets the requirements of section 1625 of the Act.

 

Human rights implications

 

Right to education

 

The Instrument engages the right to education, contained in Article 13 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. In particular, this Instrument has an effect on the provision of education by Investment Banking Institute Business School Pty Ltd by approving it as a Higher Education provider for the purposes of FEEHELP assistance under the Act, enabling it to offer FEEHELP assistance to its eligible students.

 

The objective of the Instrument is to approve Investment Banking Institute Business School Pty Ltd as a Higher Education provider under the Act and thereby enable eligible students of
 Investment Banking Institute Business School Pty Ltd to access FEEHELP assistance for courses of study.

 

To the extent that the right to education is engaged, this right is promoted by the Instrument as the Instrument approves Investment Banking Institute Business School Pty Ltd as a Higher Education provider, thereby extending FEEHELP assistance and the availability of education to its eligible students.

 

Conclusion

 

This Instrument is compatible with human rights because it advances the protection of human rights.

 

Overview

The Higher Education Support Act 2003, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, was introduced to regulate the provision of higher education support and establish a framework for approving higher education providers. This Act aims to ensure that higher education institutions meet specific standards and criteria, thereby maintaining the quality of education and supporting eligible students through financial assistance schemes like FEE-HELP. Under this Act, the Minister for Education is responsible for approving bodies as Higher Education Providers. This legislative instrument, issued under the authority of the Minister for Education, approves Investment Banking Institute Business School Pty Ltd as a Higher Education Provider, thereby enabling it to offer FEE-HELP assistance to its eligible students. This approval aligns with the policy objective of extending FEE-HELP assistance and increasing the availability of education to eligible students by recognising and supporting qualified institutions.

Scope and Application

The Higher Education Support Act 2003, as evidenced by the legislative instrument F2013L01776, governs the approval of entities as Higher Education Providers, which allows them to offer FEE-HELP assistance to eligible students. Specifically, the Minister for Education has approved Investment Banking Institute Business School Pty Ltd (ACN: 142 988 921, ABN: 46 142 988921) as a Higher Education Provider under the Act. This approval ensures that the entity meets the criteria stipulated in section 16-25 of the Act and is therefore eligible to provide FEE-HELP assistance to its students, facilitating access to higher education. The approval process under the Act involves a determination by the Minister, who is empowered to delegate such responsibilities to appropriate officers. The decision and subsequent notification of approval are legislative instruments, effective from the day they are registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments. This instrument does not apply to any other entities beyond Investment Banking Institute Business School Pty Ltd and does not require consultation as it does not impact businesses or restrict competition.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislative instrument include sections 16-25, 16-50(1), and 16-55 of the Higher Education Support Act 2003 (the Act). Section 16-25 allows for the approval of bodies as Higher Education Providers by the Minister, while section 16-50(1) mandates the Minister to decide on an application for approval and notify the applicant in writing. Subsection 16-55(1) specifies that a notice of approval is a legislative instrument. This instrument specifically approves Investment Banking Institute Business School Pty Ltd as a Higher Education Provider and notifies the applicant of this decision. The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act on the entities it governs primarily involve meeting the conditions stipulated in section 16-25. The Minister must be satisfied that the applicant meets these requirements to grant approval. Once approved, the Higher Education Provider must adhere to the regulations and standards set forth by the Act to maintain their status. The Act also mandates that the Minister, or a delegated APS employee, must provide written notification of the approval decision to the applicant. The approval and subsequent obligations ensure that Higher Education Providers maintain a certain standard of education and compliance with legislative requirements. Breaches of the Act or failure to meet the requirements may result in various civil or criminal consequences. For example, if a Higher Education Provider does not comply with the standards or regulations, they may face penalties such as fines, loss of eligibility for FEE-HELP assistance, or even revocation of their Higher Education Provider status. While specific penalties are not detailed in the text, it is clear that non-compliance can lead to significant repercussions for the institution in question. These consequences are intended to enforce adherence to the standards and regulations set by the Act.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Education Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.