THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY
higher doctorates RULES 2013
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
1. Authority for making the instrument. Section 8 of the Programs and Awards Statute 2013.
2. Purpose and operation of the instrument. The Rules provide for procedures for the receipt and assessment of candidatures for a higher doctorate of the University, and lists the higher doctorates that may be awarded by the University.
3. Documents incorporated in the instrument by reference. None.
4. Consultation process. The Rules were considered and approved by the Council of the University at its meeting on 15 February 2013.
The University wishes the instrument to commence on the day of making, 15 February 2013 as allowed for under paragraph 12(1)(a) of the LI Act 2003. We consider that the retrospective coming into effect will not affect adversely the rights of any individuals, or disadvantage those individuals, covered by the provisions of the instrument.
Governance Office
20 February 2013.
Overview
The Australian National University Higher Doctorates Rules 2013 were enacted to formalise the procedures for the receipt and assessment of candidatures for higher doctorates awarded by the University, as well as to list the specific higher doctorates that may be conferred. These rules were introduced to address the need for a comprehensive and structured approach to the awarding of higher doctorates, ensuring that the process is transparent, fair, and aligned with the University's academic standards. The enactment of these rules was authorised under Section 8 of the Programs and Awards Statute 2013. The Rules were meticulously reviewed and approved by the Council of the University at its meeting on 15 February 2013, with the intention to commence on the same day, as permitted under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The University has asserted that this retrospective commencement will not adversely affect the rights of any individuals or place them at a disadvantage.
Scope and Application
The Australian National University Higher Doctorates Rules 2013 establish the procedures for the acceptance and evaluation of applications for higher doctorates from candidates at the institution, alongside specifying the types of higher doctorates that can be conferred. This legislation applies to individuals who are seeking to pursue or have commenced a higher doctorate at the Australian National University, as well as to the University itself in its capacity to administer and assess such candidatures. The Rules are confined to the University’s jurisdiction and do not extend beyond its boundaries. There are no exclusions or exemptions explicitly stated within the explanatory statement, although it is implied that the Rules are designed to apply universally to all higher doctorate candidates at the institution. The application of these Rules is not extended or restricted by subordinate instruments according to the provided explanatory statement, which signifies that the Rules stand alone in their scope and application.
Key Provisions
The Australian National University Higher Doctorates Rules 2013, made under section 8 of the Programs and Awards Statute 2013, establish the framework for the receipt, assessment, and award of higher doctorates by the University. These rules (section 2) outline the specific procedures and eligibility criteria for candidatures seeking a higher doctorate. This includes the types of higher doctorates that the University is authorised to confer, which are explicitly listed in the Rules (section 2). The explanatory statement clarifies that no other documents are incorporated by reference in these Rules, ensuring that all necessary provisions are contained within the document itself.
Under these Rules, the Australian National University imposes certain obligations on the parties involved in the higher doctorate process. For instance, candidates must adhere to the stipulated procedures for application and assessment, which may include the submission of a research proposal, completion of required coursework, and meeting other specific academic and administrative criteria. Additionally, the University has the responsibility to assess applications in a fair and transparent manner, ensuring that all candidates are evaluated based on the same standards and requirements.
Breach of the provisions outlined in these Rules may result in various consequences, although the specific penalties or sanctions are not detailed in the explanatory statement. Generally, non-compliance with the stipulated procedures or failure to meet the eligibility criteria could lead to the rejection of a candidature or the revocation of an awarded degree. The Rules may also provide for internal University disciplinary measures for candidates found to have engaged in misconduct during the candidature process. While the exact nature and severity of penalties are not specified, they are likely to be in line with the University's broader policies on academic integrity and misconduct.
The explanatory statement notes that the Rules were considered and approved by the Council of the University at its meeting on 15 February 2013. It also indicates that the University intends for the Rules to commence on the day of making, as permitted under the Legislation Act 2003. The University asserts that the retrospective application of these Rules will not adversely affect or disadvantage any individuals, ensuring that the implementation does not disrupt ongoing candidatures or the rights of existing candidates. This statement underscores the careful consideration given to the timing and impact of the new Rules.