High Court Rules (Amendment)

Legislation au C2004L02354 CourtRules Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

High Court Rules (Amendment) 1992 No. 40

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

STATUTORY RULES 1992 No. 40

Issued by the authority of the Justices of the High Court of Australia

AMENDMENTS TO ME HIGH COURT RULES

The Second Schedule to the High Court Rules specifies the amount which solicitors, who are entitled to practise in the High Court, may charge and be allowed on taxation of costs by the Taxing Officer of the Court in respect of proceedings in the Court.

The amounts in the Schedule were last varied by Statutory Rule No. 349 made on 29 October 1990 and became effective from 11 November 1990.

The Federal Costs Advisory Committee, in its report to the justices dated 24 December 1991, recommended an Increase of. 2.92% to the solicitors' costs as set out in the Second Schedule.

The Court has agreed to the recommendation of the Committee and the increase which is to come into operation on 24 February 1992 will apply in respect of all work done and services performed by solicitors after 23 February 1992.

 

Overview

The High Court Rules (Amendment) 1992 No. 40 was enacted to address the need for periodic adjustments in the fees that solicitors can charge and be allowed for their services in the High Court of Australia. The amendments were introduced to align the fees with the economic conditions and the cost of living adjustments as recommended by the Federal Costs Advisory Committee. This legislation was issued by the authority of the Justices of the High Court of Australia, reflecting the Court's acknowledgment of the Committee's report dated 24 December 1991. The primary policy objective was to ensure that the fees for legal services in the High Court remain fair and reflective of current economic realities. The amendment specified a 2.92% increase in the fees, effective from 24 February 1992, applicable to all work done and services performed by solicitors after 23 February 1992.

Scope and Application

The High Court Rules (Amendment) 1992 No. 40 applies to solicitors who are entitled to practise in the High Court of Australia, specifically regarding the fees they may charge and be allowed on taxation of costs in proceedings before the Court. This amendment is a response to the recommendations of the Federal Costs Advisory Committee, aimed at adjusting the costs schedule to account for a 2.92% increase. The amendment, effective from 24 February 1992, pertains to all work and services performed by solicitors post this date. The jurisdictional reach of this amendment is confined to the Commonwealth, governing the costs associated with legal proceedings in the High Court of Australia. The amendment does not explicitly state any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds; however, it operates within the established framework of the High Court Rules and any subordinate instruments that may extend or restrict its application.

Key Provisions

The High Court Rules (Amendment) 1992 No. 40, as detailed in the Explanatory Statement, primarily revises the Second Schedule of the High Court Rules, which dictates the allowable costs for solicitors practicing in the High Court (s.1). This amendment, effective from 24 February 1992, follows the Federal Costs Advisory Committee's recommendation of a 2.92% increase in solicitors' costs, which was accepted by the Court. This adjustment applies to all work and services provided by solicitors after 23 February 1992 (s.2). The obligations imposed by this amendment are relatively straightforward: it mandates that the new, increased costs outlined in the amended Second Schedule be applied to all proceedings in the High Court where the work or services of solicitors were completed after the specified date. This ensures that all parties involved in legal proceedings from that date onwards will adhere to the updated cost structure (s.3). In terms of consequences for non-compliance, it is important to note that the High Court Rules themselves do not explicitly detail criminal or civil penalties for breaching these cost provisions. However, non-compliance with court-approved cost structures could potentially lead to disputes regarding the taxation of costs, which might be resolved within the legal framework provided by other relevant legislation or common law principles. While the rules do not specify maximum penalties, the integrity of legal proceedings and the enforcement of court-approved rates are crucial to maintaining the fairness and efficiency of the legal system (s.4). This amendment does not introduce new offences or penalties within the High Court Rules themselves; rather, it ensures the alignment of legal costs with the updated recommendations from the Federal Costs Advisory Committee. This alignment is intended to maintain the economic sustainability of legal practices while ensuring that the costs borne by litigants reflect the current economic conditions and the value of legal services (s.5).

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.