High Court of Australia - Rules of Court

Legislation au C1933L00023 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

STATUTORY RULES.

1933. No. 23.

––––––

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA.

Rules of Court.

As of Wednesday the first day of March, 1933.

PURSUANT to the Judiciary Act 1903-1932, the High Court Procedure Act 1903-1925, and the Matrimonial Causes Ordinance 1932 of the Territory for the Seat of Government and to all other powers thereunto enabling IT IS ORDERED that the Rules of Court hereinafter set out shall apply to all proceedings in the High Court in the Matrimonial Causes jurisdiction in respect of such Territory.

(L.S.)

FRANK GAVAN DUFFY. C.J.

G.E. RICH. J.

H. E. STARKE, J.

OWEN DIXON, J.

H. V. EVATT, J.

EDWARD, A. McTIERNAN, J.

Seaforth Mackenzie, Principal Registrar.

 

Interpretation.

1. In these Rules, unless the contrary intention appears—

the expression “Deputy Marshal” means the Deputy Marshal of the High Court in the Territory;

the expression “District Registrar” means District Registrar of the High Court in the Territory;

the expression “the Territory” means the Territory for the Seat of Government.

Application of Rules of Supreme Court of New South Wales.

2. So far as they are applicable the Rules and Regulations made and issued by the Supreme Court of New South Wales before the date of the making of these Rules and in force on that date concerning the practice and procedure of, and fixing and regulating the fees payable upon, all proceedings in the Matrimonial Causes Jurisdiction of that Court shall, subject to these Rules, govern all proceedings in the High Court in pursuance of the Matrimonial Causes Ordinance 1932.

Construction of Rules and Regulations.

3. In applying such Rules and Regulations in pursuance of the last preceding rule, except where otherwise expressly provided—

(a.) any reference to the Supreme Court to the Matrimonial Causes Court or to the Court shall be read as a reference to the High Court, and any reference to the Judge or the Judge of the Supreme Court as a reference to a Justice of the High Court;

610.—Price 3d.


(b) any reference to the Registrar shall be read as a reference to the District Registrar;

(c) any reference to the General Post Office or to the Post Office Sydney shall be read as a reference to the office of the District Registrar;

(d) any reference to the Master in Lunacy shall be read as a reference to the District Registrar or such other officer as the High Court may appoint in that behalf;

(e) any reference to trial on Circuit shall be deemed inapplicable;

(f) any reference to trial in a District Court shall be deemed in applicable;

(g) any reference to appeals, applications for new trials and for rehearings shall be deemed inapplicable and the practice and procedure of the High Court in its ordinary jurisdiction shall apply;

(h) any reference to the Crown Solicitor shall be read as a reference to the Commonwealth Crown Solicitor;

(i) any reference to the Sheriff shall be read as a reference to the Sheriff of the Territory; and

(j) any reference to Sydney shall be read as a reference to Canberra and any reference to New South Wales as a reference to the Territory.

Modification and adaptation of Rules and Regulations.

4. The Rules and Regulations applied in pursuance of rule 2 of these Rules shall be modified and adapted as follows:—

(a) In rule 11—

(i) the words “the Territory” shall be read for the words ‘‘New South Wales”; and

(ii) the word “other” shall be deemed to be omitted,

(b) In rule 13, the word “other” shall be deemed to be omitted;

(c) In rule 21, the words ‘law of the Territory” shall be read for the word “Act”;

(d) In rule 25, the words “if he does not appeal against the same” shall be deemed to be substituted for the words “he may appeal against the same, as provided by section 82 of the Act, or”;

(e) In rule 60, the words “or where any of such parties desires the issues to be tried on circuit” shall be deemed to be omitted;

(f) Rules 62, 66. and 67 shall be deemed to be omitted;

(g) In rule 68, the words “, and in Circuit cases tried by a Judge the findings of such Judge,” shall be deemed to be omitted;

(h) Rules 69, 69a, 69b and 69c shall be deemed to be omitted;

(i) In rule 73, the words “High Court” shall be read for the words “Supreme Court in proceedings at Common Law”;


(j) In rules 153, 158 and 159 the words “of the State of New South Wales” shall be read after the words “Supreme Court”;

(k) Rule 154 shall be deemed to be omitted and the following rule inserted in its stead:—

“154. If any party directed by an order or decree to pay money (whether money only, or costs only, or money with costs), shall after due service neglect to pay the same as thereby directed, the party who has obtained such order or decree shall, at the expiration of the time limited for the performance thereof, be entitled to have execution thereon as on a judgment of the High Court of Australia.

(l) In rule 170, the words “in the Supreme Court of New South Wales” shall be read before the words “at Common Law”;

(m) In rule 197, the words “in the Supreme Court of New South Wales” shall be read before the words “at Common Law”;

(n) In the Schedule of Fees—

(i) in item 7, the words “High Court” shall be deemed to be substituted for the words “Full Court”;

(ii) in item 15, the words “Chief Clerk or other” shall be deemed to be omitted; and

(iii) in item 34, the words “in the High Court in its exercise of the judicial power of the Commonwealth” shall be deemed to be substituted for the words “at Common Law”; and

(o) In the Schedule of Costs—

(i) the words “other than the Sydney Agent” shall be deemed to be omitted;

(ii) the words “in Sydney or” shall be deemed to be omitted; and

(iii) the words “in Sydney nor” shall be deemed to be omitted.

 

By Authority: L. F. Johnston, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra

Overview

The High Court (Matrimonial Causes) Rules 1933 (C1933L00023) were enacted to address the procedural needs specific to matrimonial causes jurisdiction within the High Court, particularly in relation to the newly established Territory for the Seat of Government. These rules were introduced under the authority of the Judiciary Act 1903-1932, the High Court Procedure Act 1903-1925, and the Matrimonial Causes Ordinance 1932. The policy objective of these rules was to ensure that the existing procedures and regulations from the Supreme Court of New South Wales were suitably adapted to the new context of the High Court's jurisdiction over matrimonial causes in the Territory, thereby maintaining consistency and efficiency in legal proceedings. The enacting body responsible for these rules was the High Court itself, as empowered by the aforementioned Acts and Ordinance.

Scope and Application

The High Court of Australia Rules of Court, as outlined in Statutory Rules 1933 No. 23, are designed to govern all proceedings within the High Court concerning matrimonial causes within the Territory for the Seat of Government, specifically Canberra. These rules apply to the High Court's jurisdiction in matters related to matrimonial causes as per the Matrimonial Causes Ordinance 1932. The rules are applicable to all parties involved in such proceedings within the specified territory, including individuals, entities, and legal practitioners. They also extend to the conduct and transactions directly related to matrimonial matters handled by the High Court. These rules are an extension of the Matrimonial Causes Ordinance 1932 and are implemented under the authority granted by the Judiciary Act 1903-1932 and the High Court Procedure Act 1903-1925. While the rules are primarily concerned with the procedural aspects of matrimonial causes, they incorporate and adapt the relevant rules and regulations of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, making necessary modifications to suit the context of the High Court in Canberra. This includes adjustments to references, applicability of certain provisions, and adaptations in the schedule of fees and costs to align with the High Court’s jurisdiction.

Key Provisions

The Rules of Court, promulgated under the authority of the Judiciary Act 1903-1932, the High Court Procedure Act 1903-1925, and the Matrimonial Causes Ordinance 1932, apply to all proceedings in the High Court concerning matrimonial causes within the Territory. These Rules serve to establish the procedural framework for such cases, aligning with the practices and regulations of the Supreme Court of New South Wales where applicable. The Rules incorporate by reference the existing Rules and Regulations of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, with necessary modifications to fit the context of the High Court’s jurisdiction over matrimonial causes. For example, references to the Supreme Court or its Judge are interpreted as referring to the High Court or a Justice of the High Court, respectively. Similarly, references to the Registrar, post office, and other officials are adapted to reflect the corresponding officers within the High Court or the Territory. Certain provisions, such as those relating to trials on circuit, appeals, and applications for new trials, are deemed inapplicable to the High Court’s proceedings. The obligations imposed by these Rules include adherence to the procedural standards set forth by the Supreme Court of New South Wales, with necessary adaptations. Parties and officials must ensure compliance with these adapted Rules and Regulations, including timely filing of documents, payment of prescribed fees, and adherence to specific timelines for various court processes. For instance, the omission of certain rules pertaining to circuit cases and appeals indicates a streamlined process for matrimonial causes within the High Court. The Rules also mandate the substitution of certain terms to reflect the unique administrative structure of the High Court in its exercise of jurisdiction over matrimonial causes. Breach of these Rules may have legal consequences. For instance, failure to comply with the deadlines for payment of money or costs as ordered by the High Court may result in the prevailing party obtaining execution on the judgment. Such non-compliance could lead to enforcement actions against the defaulting party’s assets. While specific penalties are not detailed within the Rules, the general principles of court contempt and enforcement of judgments under Australian law would apply. These could include fines or imprisonment for persistent non-compliance, depending on the severity and circumstances of the breach.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Delegated & Subordinate Legislation

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.