High Court of Australia - Rule of Court

Legislation au C1931L00112 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

STATUTORY RULES.

1931. No. 112.

 

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA.

Principal Registry,

Melbourne, 18th August, 1931.

NOTICE is hereby given that Their Honours the Justices of the High Court of Australia have been pleased to make the following Rule of Court.

SEAFORTH MACKENZIE, Principal Registrar.

 

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA.

Rule of Court.

(As of Tuesday, the eighteenth day of August, a. d. 1931.)

Pursuant to section 30b (3) of the Judiciary Act 1903-1927 and the High Court Procedure Act 1903-1925 and to all other powers thereunto enabling—

It is ordered as follows:—

Sittings of the High Court in its Original Jurisdiction in relation to the Territory for the Seat of Government shall be held for the trial of criminal causes or matters at the Court House at Darlinghurst, Sydney, on Friday, the twenty-first day of August, A.D. 1931.

(L.S.)

FRANK GAVAN DUFFY, C.J.

G. E. RICH, J.

H. E. STARKE, J.

H. V. EVATT, J.

EDWARD A. McTIERNAN, J.

Seaforth Mackenzie,

Principal Registrar.

 

By Authority: H. J. Green, Government Printer, Canberra.

2945.—Price 3d.

Overview

The Statutory Rules 1931 No. 112, titled "High Court of Australia Rule of Court," was enacted to establish the sittings of the High Court in its Original Jurisdiction in relation to the Territory for the Seat of Government. This legislative instrument was made pursuant to the powers granted under section 30b (3) of the Judiciary Act 1903-1927 and the High Court Procedure Act 1903-1925. The enacting body responsible for this rule was the High Court of Australia, with the purpose of addressing the procedural need to set specific dates and locations for the court's criminal trials in Sydney. This rule was made under the authority of the High Court's principal registrar, Seaforth Mackenzie, and was signed by the Chief Justice, Frank Gavan Duffy, and other Justices of the High Court. The objective was to ensure that the court's proceedings were properly organised and communicated to the relevant parties.

Scope and Application

This statutory rule, issued under the authority of the Judiciary Act 1903-1927 and the High Court Procedure Act 1903-1925, pertains to the conduct of sittings of the High Court of Australia in its Original Jurisdiction, specifically for the trial of criminal causes or matters within the Territory for the Seat of Government. The rule mandates that such sittings shall take place at the Court House in Darlinghurst, Sydney, on Friday, the twenty-first day of August, A.D. 1931. This particular rule serves to ensure the orderly administration of justice by specifying the geographic location and date for the High Court's jurisdiction over criminal matters within the designated territory. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions in this rule, which applies directly to the High Court’s procedures as outlined. The rule is an example of how subordinate instruments extend the application of primary legislation by providing specific details and timelines for court sittings.

Key Provisions

The statutory rule C1931L00112 outlines the arrangement for the High Court of Australia to conduct sittings in its original jurisdiction in relation to the Territory for the Seat of Government. This specific rule mandates that such sittings are to be held at the Court House in Darlinghurst, Sydney, on a particular date, Friday, the twenty-first day of August, 1931 (section 1). The rule is issued pursuant to the powers granted under section 30b(3) of the Judiciary Act 1903-1927 and the High Court Procedure Act 1903-1925, ensuring that it falls within the legal framework established by these Acts. This legislative instrument imposes specific obligations on the High Court of Australia. It mandates that the Court must convene in its original jurisdiction on the designated date and location. This requirement is critical to ensure that the Court is able to exercise its judicial functions within the Territory for the Seat of Government, maintaining the continuity and integrity of the legal system. The rule also places an administrative responsibility on the Principal Registrar, Seaforth Mackenzie, to ensure that the sittings are properly organised and conducted in accordance with the rule. Failure to comply with this rule could result in significant legal consequences. Although the rule itself does not explicitly detail specific offences or penalties, any deviation from the mandated schedule or location for the sittings could potentially be viewed as a breach of the court's statutory obligations. Such a breach might be subject to further judicial review or administrative action under the applicable Acts, including the Judiciary Act 1903-1927 and the High Court Procedure Act 1903-1925. The precise consequences of non-compliance would depend on the specific context and any relevant judicial interpretations at the time.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Commencement Provisions
Delegated & Subordinate Legislation

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.