HIGH COURT AMENDMENT (CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS) RULES 2016
23 AUGUST 2016
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
These Amendment Rules of Court, signed by the Justices on 23 August 2016, are made by the Justices under the Judiciary Act 1903, the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918, the Nauru (High Court Appeals) Act 1976 and the High Court of Australia Act 1979.
The Amendment Rules complement Practice Direction No. 1 of 2016 which the Justices issued on 7 July 2016 relating to applications for suppression orders and non-publication orders made under Part XAA of the Judiciary Act 1903. The amendment Rules are intended to ensure that the terms of any suppression order, non-publication order, or other confidentiality order made by a court in relation to documents filed in the High Court are identified at the time of filing the documents and that the provisions in the High Court Rules permitting inspection and copying of documents on the court file do not impede the operation of such orders.
The Amendment Rules amend Part 1 and Part 4 of the High Court Rules as follows:
Part 1 – Preliminary
Rule 1.08 Documents
Rule 1.08.6 has been added to require a party filing a document containing information which is the subject of a suppression order, a non-publication order, or any other confidentiality order made by a court to file with the document a copy of the relevant order.
Part 4 – Time, recesses and the Registry
Rule 4.07.4 Custody and inspection of documents in the Registry
Rule 4.07.4 permits, on payment of the prescribed fee, the inspection and copying of documents filed in an office of the Registry, with the exception of certain documents. The current exceptions are evidence provided in affidavits not yet received in evidence (Rule 4.07.4(a)) and documents containing information disclosing the identity of a person where disclosure of the identity of that person is prohibited (Rule 4.07.4(b)). The amendment Rules add to the exceptions to Rule 4.07.4 documents containing information the subject of a suppression order, non-publication order, or any other confidentiality order (Rule 4.07.4(c)) or the subject of an application, not yet determined, for such an order (Rule 4.07.4(d)).
Commencement
The amendment provisions commence on the day after the Rules are registered.
Consultation
Consultations on the changes have taken place with relevant professional organisations and the Special Committee of Solicitors-General.
Statement of Compatibility
Rules of court are not legislative instruments (see paragraph 8(8)(d) of the Legislation Act 2003). Accordingly, section 9 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 does not require a statement of compatibility to be prepared in respect of rules of court made by the High Court, and no statement of compatibility for the purposes of that latter Act is included in the Explanatory Statement.
Overview
The High Court Amendment (Confidential Documents) Rules 2016 were enacted to address the need for improved management and protection of confidential information in documents filed with the High Court of Australia. These rules were introduced to ensure that any suppression orders, non-publication orders, or other confidentiality orders made by a court are properly identified and respected when documents are filed. This was necessary to prevent the provisions in the High Court Rules that permit inspection and copying of documents from undermining these confidentiality orders. The Justices of the High Court issued these Amendment Rules under the authority of several acts, including the Judiciary Act 1903 and the High Court of Australia Act 1979. The overarching policy objective of these rules is to maintain the integrity of court processes by ensuring that sensitive information is protected appropriately.
Scope and Application
The High Court Amendment (Confidential Documents) Rules 2016 applies to parties involved in legal proceedings in the High Court of Australia, specifically those who file documents containing information subject to a suppression order, non-publication order, or any other confidentiality order. These rules complement the Practice Direction No. 1 of 2016, addressing the need for transparency and adherence to court-imposed confidentiality measures. They ensure that the terms of any such orders are identified at the time of filing documents and that the standard provisions for the inspection and copying of documents do not conflict with these orders. The amendment rules extend to the High Court of Australia, thereby affecting the entire Commonwealth of Australia. They introduce specific exceptions to the general rule allowing inspection and copying of documents filed in the Registry, now excluding documents subject to confidentiality orders and those pending such orders. The commencement of these rules is scheduled for the day after their registration, providing a clear timeline for their implementation.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of the High Court Amendment (Confidential Documents) Rules 2016 involve modifications to Parts 1 and 4 of the High Court Rules. Firstly, Rule 1.08.6 under Part 1 requires that any party filing a document that contains information subject to a suppression order, a non-publication order, or any other confidentiality order, must also file a copy of the relevant order with the document. This ensures that the confidentiality measures are identified at the time of filing.
The obligations imposed by these Rules are primarily on the parties involved in the litigation process within the High Court. They must comply with the new requirements when filing documents that contain confidential information. Specifically, they must attach the relevant suppression, non-publication, or confidentiality order to the document they file. This requirement ensures transparency and adherence to the court's confidentiality directives from the outset.
Failure to comply with these Rules can result in various consequences. Although the Explanatory Statement does not specify particular offences or penalties, breaches of court rules generally can lead to civil or criminal actions depending on the severity and intent of the breach. In the context of confidentiality orders, non-compliance could potentially result in the disclosure of sensitive information, which might lead to legal repercussions for the offending party.
It is also important to note that the Rules aim to prevent the inspection and copying of documents that contain information subject to confidentiality orders, as per Rule 4.07.4. This rule already excludes certain documents from inspection and copying, such as affidavits not yet received in evidence and documents revealing the identity of a person where disclosure is prohibited. The amendment adds documents subject to suppression orders, non-publication orders, or any other confidentiality orders, and those subject to pending applications for such orders, to the list of exceptions. This ensures that the confidentiality of sensitive information is maintained throughout the judicial process.
The Amendment Rules came into effect the day after they were registered. Consultations on these changes were conducted with relevant professional organisations and the Special Committee of Solicitors-General, ensuring that the amendments were well considered and aligned with the needs of the legal profession.