HIGH COURT RULE OF COURT
4 SEPTEMBER 2017
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Each year, the Justices of the High Court of Australia make a Rule of Court appointing the places and days of the sittings of each Full Court for the following year. These Rules of Court are made by the Justices under the
rule-making power given by s 86 of the Judiciary Act 1903.
This Rule of Court appoints the sittings of the Full Court of the High Court for 2018. Sittings of the Court will continue to be held in Adelaide, Brisbane, Hobart and Perth as required. Additional sittings of the Full Court may also be held on other days as required, for example in matters requiring expedition. These sittings are appointed by the Chief Justice pursuant to Rule 6.04.2 of the High Court Rules 2004.
As in previous years, no consultation was necessary in relation to the appointment of the High Court sitting dates for 2018. The Rule does not substantially alter long-standing arrangements.
Overview
The High Court Rule of Court 2018, enacted on 4 September 2017, outlines the schedule for the sittings of the Full Court of the High Court of Australia for the year 2018. This rule was introduced to facilitate the continuity of judicial proceedings across various locations, ensuring that the court can meet as required to address matters in an efficient manner. The rule was enacted by the Justices of the High Court under the authority granted by section 86 of the Judiciary Act 1903. The policy objective behind the rule is to maintain consistent and accessible court sittings across different cities, including Adelaide, Brisbane, Hobart, and Perth, and to accommodate additional sittings when necessary for expeditious case management. The rule maintains long-established practices without necessitating consultation, thereby ensuring smooth judicial operations.
Scope and Application
The High Court Rule of Court 2017 pertains to the scheduling of the sittings of the Full Court of the High Court of Australia for the year 2018, as mandated by the Justices of the High Court under the authority conferred by section 86 of the Judiciary Act 1903. This rule specifies that the Full Court will convene in Adelaide, Brisbane, Hobart, and Perth as per necessity, with the Chief Justice having the discretion to arrange additional sittings on other days, particularly when matters demand expeditious attention. The rule is part of the High Court Rules 2004 and follows established practices without necessitating consultation, as it does not introduce significant changes to the existing arrangements. The rule applies to the High Court itself and the entities or individuals involved in cases requiring the attention of the Full Court, thereby impacting the judicial processes and timelines within the Australian legal system. The geographic reach of the rule is limited to the designated locations within Australia where the High Court chooses to sit, reflecting the national jurisdiction of the Court. No specific exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds are mentioned in the rule, and its application may be further refined through subordinate instruments as required.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the F2017L01150 legislation, which pertains to the High Court Rule of Court for the year 2018, outline the appointment of places and days for the sittings of the Full Court of the High Court. Under this rule, the Justices of the High Court of Australia, in accordance with s 86 of the Judiciary Act 1903, designate the locations and dates for the Full Court sittings for the upcoming year (s 2). These locations include Adelaide, Brisbane, Hobart, and Perth, with additional sittings potentially being held on other days as necessary, particularly in cases requiring expedited handling (s 3). The Chief Justice has the authority to appoint these additional sittings, as stipulated in Rule 6.04.2 of the High Court Rules 2004 (s 4).
The obligations and requirements imposed by this Act are primarily administrative in nature. The Justices of the High Court must ensure that the locations and dates for the Full Court sittings are appointed annually, maintaining continuity with previous years unless changes are warranted (s 2). The Chief Justice, under Rule 6.04.2 of the High Court Rules 2004, has the discretion to schedule additional sittings as necessary to handle urgent matters (s 4). This rule aims to provide flexibility in the judicial process to meet the demands of the caseload.
There are no explicit offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined in the F2017L01150 legislation for breach of the provisions. The rule primarily serves an administrative function to organise the judicial calendar and does not introduce new enforcement mechanisms or sanctions for non-compliance. The focus remains on the orderly conduct of court proceedings and the efficient administration of justice within the High Court system.