HIGH COMMISSIONER.
No. 52 of 1940.
An Act to amend section nine of the High Commissioner Act 1909-1937.
[Assented to 22nd August, 1940.]
[Date of commencement, 19th September, 1940.]
BE it enacted by the King’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:—
Short title and citation.
1.—(1.) This Act may be cited as the High Commissioner Act 1940.
(2.) The High Commissioner Act 1909-1937, as amended by this Act, may be cited as the High Commissioner Act 1909-1940
High Commissioner may appoint officers.
2. Section nine of the High Commissioner Act 1909-1937 is amended—
(a) by omitting sub-section (3.); and
(b) by omitting from sub-section (5) the words “, subject to sub-section (3.) of this section,”.
Overview
The High Commissioner Act 1940, assented to on 22 August 1940 and commenced on 19 September 1940, was enacted by the King’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia to amend section nine of the High Commissioner Act 1909-1937. The primary aim of this legislation was to modify the appointment process for officers by the High Commissioner, specifically by removing subsection (3) and certain words from subsection (5) of the earlier Act. This amendment likely sought to streamline or clarify the authority and conditions under which the High Commissioner could appoint officers, addressing a gap or issue identified in the original Act.
Scope and Application
The High Commissioner Act 1940 is an amendment to the existing High Commissioner Act 1909-1937, modifying its provisions to allow the High Commissioner to appoint officers without the previously required approval outlined in section nine. This Act applies to the High Commissioner, who is an officer of the Commonwealth of Australia, and concerns the administrative authority and powers of this individual in relation to the appointment of staff. Geographically, the Act applies nationally as it is Commonwealth legislation, affecting the High Commissioner's conduct and the appointments they make throughout Australia. There are no explicit exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds stated within the text of the Act itself. The scope and application of the Act may be further defined or extended through subordinate instruments, which could provide additional regulations or guidelines for the implementation of these amendments.
Key Provisions
The High Commissioner Act 1940 (C1940A00052) amends Section nine of the High Commissioner Act 1909-1937 (referred to as the High Commissioner Act 1909-1940 after this amendment). This Act allows the High Commissioner to appoint officers, as per Section two of the new Act. The primary change introduced by this amendment is the removal of subsection (3) and the alteration of subsection (5) of the original Act's Section nine, thereby streamlining the process for officer appointments by the High Commissioner.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the High Commissioner Act 1940 primarily concern the appointment of officers by the High Commissioner. The High Commissioner is now empowered to appoint officers without the constraints that were previously outlined in subsection (3) and the dependencies referenced in subsection (5). This amendment aims to provide greater flexibility and efficiency in the administrative process, enabling the High Commissioner to manage and appoint officers more effectively. The High Commissioner must still adhere to any overarching regulations and guidelines that govern the appointment of public officers in Australia, ensuring that the appointments are made fairly and in accordance with the law.
For breaches of the provisions within the High Commissioner Act 1940, the Act does not specify particular offences or penalties. However, any actions taken under this Act that contravene broader public service laws or other relevant legislation may incur penalties as prescribed by those laws. For instance, improper appointment practices could lead to disciplinary actions under the Public Service Act 1999 or other applicable statutes, with potential penalties including fines or even criminal charges in cases of gross misconduct. It is crucial for the High Commissioner and those involved in the appointment process to ensure compliance with all relevant laws to avoid any legal repercussions.