EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Health
Health Insurance Act 1973
Health Insurance (Section 3C General Medical Services – Specialist, Consultant Physician and Consultant Psychiatrist COVID-19 Telehealth Services) Amendment Determination No.1 2020.
Subsection 3C(1) of the Health Insurance Act 1973 (the Act) provides that the Minister may, by legislative instrument, determine that a health service not specified in an item in the general medical services table (the Table) shall, in specified circumstances and for specified statutory provisions, be treated as if it were specified in the Table.
The Table is set out in the regulations made under subsection 4(1) of the Act. The most recent version of the regulations is the Health Insurance (General Medical Services Table) Regulations 2019.
This instrument relies on subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (AIA). Subsection 33(3) of the AIA provides that where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.
Purpose
On 11 March 2020, the Prime Minister, the Hon. Scott Morrison MP, announced a comprehensive $2.4 billion health package to protect all Australians, including vulnerable groups such as the elderly, those with chronic conditions and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, from the coronavirus (COVID-19).
As part of the package, the Government announced $100 million to fund new Medicare services for people in home isolation or quarantine, as a result COVID-19, to receive health consultations remotely.
On 13 March 2020, ten new temporary Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) items were introduced to allow specialists, consultant physicians and consultant psychiatrists to provide services by video conference to patients who have been diagnosed with the COVID-19 virus, or who are more vulnerable of contracting the COVID-19 virus. The services are also able to be provided by specialists, consultant physicians and consultant psychiatrists who are in isolation for possible COVID-19 infection. These items are prescribed in the Health Insurance (Section 3C General Medical Services – Specialist, Consultant Physician and Consultant Psychiatry COVID-19 Telehealth Services) Determination 2020 (the Principal Determination).
The purpose of the Health Insurance (Section 3C General Medical Services – Specialist, Consultant Physician and Consultant Psychiatry COVID-19 Telehealth Services) Amendment Determination No.1 2020 (the Amendment Determination) is to amend the Principal Determination to include ten new temporary MBS items to allow specialists, consultant physicians and consultant psychiatrists to provide these services via the phone when video conferencing is unavailable to patients who have been diagnosed with the COVID-19 virus, or who are more vulnerable of contracting the COVID-19 virus.
These new services will also be able to be provided by specialists, consultant physicians and consultant psychiatrists who are in isolation for possible COVID-19 infection. This will allow specialists (item 91832 and 91833), consultant physicians (items 91834, 91835 and 91836) and consultant psychiatrists (items 91837, 91838, 91839, 91840 and 91841) to continue to provide certain health services to their patients during the period of their isolation.
The purpose of the Amendment Determination is to ensure patients can receive Medicare benefits whilst in home isolation or quarantine or whilst the health professional is in home isolation or quarantine, as a result of COVID-19 virus. To this effect, the amendments in the Schedule are taken to have commenced immediately after the Principal Determination commenced. This is to ensure that patients will continue to be able to receive Medicare benefits for these services and will not be disadvantaged during in home isolation or quarantine, as a result of COVID-19 virus. Although Schedule 1 applies retrospectively, it is not contrary to section 12 of the Legislation Act 2003 as it does not disadvantage a person and only imposes applies a liability on the Commonwealth for the retrospective period.
Consultation
On 11 March 2020, the Prime Minister, the Hon. Scott Morrison MP, announced a comprehensive health package to protect all Australians, including vulnerable groups such as the elderly, those with chronic conditions and Indigenous communities, from the coronavirus (COVID-19). Due to the nature of the emergency and the short timeframe in drafting this legislative instrument to implement this phase of the health package, it was not reasonably practicable to undertake consultation with representatives of persons affected by the instrument.
Details of the Determination are set out in the Attachment.
The Determination commences on 13 March 2020.
The Determination is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislation Act 2003.
Authority: Subsection 3C(1) of the
Health Insurance Act 1973
ATTACHMENT
Details of the Health Insurance (Section 3C General Medical Services – Specialist, Consultant Physician and Consultant Psychiatry COVID-19 Telehealth Services) Amendment Determination No.1 2020
Section 1 – Name
Section 1 provides for the Determination to be referred to as the Health Insurance (Section 3C General Medical Services – Specialist, Consultant Physician and Consultant Psychiatry COVID-19 Telehealth Services) Amendment Determination No.1 2020
Section 2 – Commencement
Section 2 provides that the Determination commences on 13 March 2020.
Section 3 – Authority
Section 3 provides that the Determination is made under subsection 3C(1) of the Health Insurance Act 1973.
Section 4 – Schedules
Section 4 provides that each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to this Determination is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this Determination has effect according to its terms.
Schedule 1 – Amendments
Health Insurance (Section 3C General Medical Services – Specialist, Consultant Physician and Consultant Psychiatrist COVID-19 Telehealth Services) Determination 2020
The purpose of the Amendment Determination is to create ten new items to allow specialists, consultant physicians and consultant psychiatrists to provide services via the telephone to patients who have been diagnosed with the COVID-19 virus, or who are more vulnerable of contracting the COVID-19 virus or health professionals at risk of COVID-19 virus as defined in section 5 of the Principal Determination.
Item 1 – Definition
Section 5 of the Principal Determination provides a definitions for that instrument. Item 1 amends the Principal Determination to include a new class of patients to the definition of ‘patient at risk of COVID-19 virus’ which includes ‘or (d) the person meets the current national triage protocol criteria for suspected COVID-19 infection’.
This amendment is to incorporate services for people who require triage in line with the current national triage protocol criteria for suspected COVID-19 infection.
Item 2 – Definition
Section 5 of the Principal Determination provides a definitions for that instrument. Item 2 amends the Principal Determination to add a definition of ‘phone attendance’ which specifies what a phone attendance involves.
The definition of phone attendance provides for a professional attendance undertake by a telephone where the health practitioner; has the capacity to undertake the full service safely and in accordance with professional standards; and where it is clinically appropriate; and is able to maintain an audio link with the patient.
Item 3
Item 3 inserts an application of COVID-19 medical practitioner phone services whereby these items are provided by telephone and require an audio link only.
Division 1.4 – Services and fees – specialist attendances via phone services
Division 1.4 of the Amendment Determination lists two new professional attendance items (91832 and 91833) that are to be provided by a specialist in the practice of the specialist’s specialty by telephone to patients who are at risk of COVID-19 virus or by health professionals at risk of COVID-19 virus.
The patient at risk of COVID-19 virus needs to have a referral in order to access the new services and must not be an admitted patient of a hospital. The new services must bulk-billed.
For the purpose of Division 1.4, a specialist has the same meaning as in the Health Insurance Act 1973 (the Act). The meaning of specialist is a specialist, in relation to a particular specialty, which means a medical practitioner in relation to whom there is in force a determination under section 3DB or 3E of the Act, that the medical practitioner is recognised as a specialist in that specialty, or a medical practitioner who is taken to be so recognised under section 3D of the Act.
These items are telephone services and require an audio link only. Subclause 1.4.1(1) requires that the rendering practitioner must not perform a service in subgroup 7 if the practitioner and the patient have the capacity to undertake an attendance by video conference.
Division 1.5 – Services and fees – consultant physician (other than psychiatry) attendances via phone services
Division 1.5 of the Amendment Determination lists three new professional attendance items (91834, 91835 and 91836) that are to be provided by a consultant physician in the practice of the consultant physician’s specialty (other than psychiatry) via telephone to patients who are at risk of COVID-19 virus or by health professionals at risk of COVID-19 virus.
The patient at risk of COVID-19 virus needs to have a referral from a referring practitioner in order to access the new services and must not be an admitted patient of a hospital. The new services must bulk-billed.
For the purpose of Division 1.5, a consultant physician has the same meaning as in the Act. The meaning of consultant physician is a consultant physician in relation to a particular specialty, which means a medical practitioner in relation to whom there is in force a determination under section 3DB or 3E of the Act, that the medical practitioner is recognised as a consultant physician in that specialty.
These items are telephone services and require an audio link only. Subclause 1.5.1(1) requires that the rendering practitioner must not perform a service in subgroup 8 if the practitioner and the patient have the capacity to undertake an attendance by video conference.
Division 1.6 – Services and fees – consultant psychiatrist attendances via phone services
Division 1.6 of the Amendment Determination lists five new professional attendance items (91837, 91838, 91839, 91840 and 91841) that are to be provided by a consultant physician in the practice of the consultant physician’s specialty of psychiatry via telephone to patients who are at risk of COVID-19 virus or by health professionals at risk of COVID-19 virus.
The patient at risk of COVID-19 virus needs to have a referral from a referring practitioner in order to access the new services and must not be an admitted patient of a hospital. The new services must be bulk-billed.
For the purpose of Division 1.3, a consultant physician has the same meaning as in the Act. The meaning of consultant physician, is a consultant physician in relation to a particular specialty, which means a medical practitioner in relation to whom there is in force a determination under section 3DB or 3E of the Act, that the medical practitioner is recognised as a consultant physician in that specialty.
These items are telephone services and require an audio link only. Subclause 1.6.1(1) requires that the rendering practitioner must not perform a service in subgroup 9 if the practitioner and the patient have the capacity to undertake an attendance by video conference.
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
Health Insurance (Section 3C General Medical Services – Specialist, Consultant Physician and Consultant Psychiatry COVID-19 Telehealth Services) Amendment Determination No.1 2020
This instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the Determination
On 11 March 2020, the Prime Minister, the Hon. Scott Morrison MP, announced a comprehensive $2.4 billion health package to protect all Australians, including vulnerable groups such as the elderly, those with chronic conditions and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, from the coronavirus (COVID-19).
As part of the package, the Government announced $100 million to fund new Medicare services for people in home isolation or quarantine, as a result COVID-19, to receive health consultations remotely.
On 13 March 2020, ten new temporary Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) items were introduced to allow specialists, consultant physicians and consultant psychiatrists to provide services by video conference to patients who have been diagnosed with the COVID-19 virus, or who are more vulnerable of contracting the COVID-19 virus. The services are also able to be provided by specialists, consultant physicians and consultant psychiatrists who are in isolation for possible COVID-19 infection.
The purpose of the Health Insurance (Section 3C General Medical Services – Specialist, Consultant Physician and Consultant Psychiatry COVID-19 Telehealth Services) Amendment Determination No.1 2020 (the Amendment Determination) is to amend the Principal Determination to include ten new temporary MBS items to allow specialists, consultant physicians and consultant psychiatrists to provide these services via the phone when video conferencing is unavailable to patients who have been diagnosed with the COVID-19 virus, or who are vulnerable of contracting the COVID-19 virus.
These new services will also be able to be provided by specialists, consultant physicians and consultant psychiatrists who are in isolation for possible COVID-19 infection. This will allow specialists (item 91832 and 91833), consultant physicians (items 91834, 91835 and 91836) and consultant psychiatrists (items 91837, 91838, 91839, 91840 and 91841) to continue to provide certain health services to their patients during the period of their isolation.
Human rights implications
This instrument engages Articles 9 and 12 of the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), specifically the rights to health and social security.
The Right to Health
The right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health is contained in Article 12(1) of the ICESCR. The UN Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (the Committee) has stated that the right to health is not a right for each individual to be healthy, but is a right to a system of health protection which provides equality of opportunity for people to enjoy the highest attainable level of health.
The Committee reports that the ‘highest attainable standard of health’ takes into account the country’s available resources. This right may be understood as a right of access to a variety of public health and health care facilities, goods, services, programs, and conditions necessary for the realisation of the highest attainable standard of health.
The Right to Social Security
The right to social security is contained in Article 9 of the ICESCR. It requires that a country must, within its maximum available resources, ensure access to a social security scheme that provides a minimum essential level of benefits to all individuals and families that will enable them to acquire at least essential health care. Countries are obliged to demonstrate that every effort has been made to use all resources that are at their disposal in an effort to satisfy, as a matter of priority, this minimum obligation.
The Committee reports that there is a strong presumption that retrogressive measures taken in relation to the right to social security are prohibited under ICESCR. In this context, a retrogressive measure would be one taken without adequate justification that had the effect of reducing existing levels of social security benefits, or of denying benefits to persons or groups previously entitled to them. However, it is legitimate for a Government to re-direct its limited resources in ways that it considers to be more effective at meeting the general health needs of all society, particularly the needs of the more disadvantaged members of society.
Analysis
This instrument advances the right to health and the right to social security by ensuring people who have been affected by COVID-19 can access publicly subsidised health services without the risk of affecting other people or health professionals.
Conclusion
This instrument is compatible with human rights as it advances the right to health and the right to social security.
David Weiss
First Assistant Secretary
Medical Benefits Division
Health Financing Group
Department of Health