Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Amendment (2022 Measures No. 3) Regulations 2022

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2022L01049 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Health Insurance Act 1973

 

Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Amendment (2022 Measures No. 3) Regulations 2022

 

Subsection 133(1) of the Health Insurance Act 1973 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, prescribing all matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed, or necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.

 

Part VAA of the Act provides for the Professional Services Review (PSR) Scheme which can review and investigate the provision of services by a person to determine whether the person has engaged in inappropriate practice.

 

Section 82 of the Act provides definitions of inappropriate practice by practitioners. Subsection 82(1A) provides that a practitioner engages in inappropriate practice in rendering or initiating services during a particular period (the relevant period) if the circumstances in which some or all of the services were rendered or initiated constitute a prescribed pattern of services.

 

Subsection 82(1B) of the Act provides practitioners a defence that certain prescribed pattern of services do not constitute inappropriate practice if a PSR Committee could reasonably conclude exceptional circumstances existed that affected the rendering or initiating of the services.

 

Section 82A of the Act provides that regulations may prescribe circumstances in which services rendered or initiated by a medical practitioner constitute a prescribed pattern of services. These circumstances are prescribed in the Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Regulations 2019 (Principal Regulations).

 

Purpose

On 1 July 2022, the Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Amendment (2022 Measures No. 2) Regulations 2022 (PSR Amendment Regulations) amended the Principal Regulations to introduce a new 30/20. Under the 30/20 rule, a medical practitioner is taken to have engaged in inappropriate practice if they have rendered or initiated 30 or more ‘relevant phone services’ on each of 20 or more days in a 12 month period. Relevant phone service is defined in section 5 of the Principal Regulations and includes phone services performed by GPs, other medical practitioners in general practice, and consultant physicians.

 

The Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Amendment (2022 Measures No. 3) Regulations 2022 (the Regulations) amends the Principal Regulations to temporarily remove the 30/20 rule from the prescribed pattern of services rules. This recognises that practitioners may be required to temporarily render more phone services as COVID-19 infections increase across the community, as they will be treating more positive COVID-19 patients while also managing the risk of transmission. The Government’s intention is that this rule will recommence on
1 October 2022.

 

The Regulations will retrospectively commence immediately after the commencement of the PSR Amendment Regulations on 1 July 2022 to temporarily cease the introduction of the 30/20 rule. The amendments to the prescribed patterns of service rules in the Regulations will not negatively disadvantage practitioners as these changes allow practitioners to continue providing phone services without being taken to have engaged in inappropriate practice from 1 July 2022.

 

Consultation

Consultation was undertaken with the Australian Medical Association, Royal Australian College of Physicians, Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, Royal Australian College of Surgeons and the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists regarding the changes made to the Principal Regulations on
1 July 2022.

 

It was not reasonably practicable to undertake consultation with all representatives of persons affected by the proposed Regulations considering the nature of the
COVID-19 emergency and given that the deferment of the 30/20 rule will allow practitioners to temporarily provide more phone services to help support the community during the current increase in COVID-19 infections across Australia.

 

Details of the Regulations are set out in the Attachment.

 

The Regulations are a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislation Act 2003.

 

The Regulations will commence immediately after the commencement of the Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Amendment (2022 Measures No. 2) Regulations 2022.

 

 

 Authority:  Subsection 133(1) of the

                                                                                         Health Insurance Act 1973 


ATTACHMENT

 

Details of the Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Amendment (2022 Measures No. 3) Regulations 2022

 

Section 1 – Name

 

This section provides for the Regulations to be referred to as the Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Amendment (2022 Measures No. 3) Regulations 2022.

 

Section 2 – Commencement

 

This section provides for the Regulations to commence immediately after the commencement of the Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Amendment (2022 Measures No. 2) Regulations 2022.

 

Section 3 – Authority 

 

This section provides that the Regulations are made under the Health Insurance Act 1973.

 

Section 4 – Schedules

 

This section provides that each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to this instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this instrument has effect according to its terms.

 

Schedule 1 – Amendments

 

Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Regulations 2019 (Principal Regulations)

 

Amendment item [1] – section 5 (definition of relevant phone service)

 

Section 5 of the Principal Regulations defined a ‘relevant phone service’ which was used to prescribe circumstances constituting prescribed pattern of services, per the rule in section 8. This particular prescribed pattern of services was known as the 30/20 rule and included phone services performed by GPs, other medical practitioners in general practice, and consultant physicians. This item removes the definition to reflect the policy to temporarily remove phone items from this particular prescribed pattern of services rule.

 

Amendment item [2] – section 8

 

Section 8 of the PSR Regulations provides the circumstances constituting prescribed pattern of services. This item repeals and replaces section 8 to remove the 30/20 rule from circumstances constituting prescribed pattern of services. A medical practitioner will continue to be taken to have engaged in inappropriate practice from 1 July 2022 if they have rendered or initiated 80 or more ‘relevant services’ on each of 20 or more days in a 12 month period (the 80/20 rule).


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Amendment (2022 Measures No. 3) Regulations 2022

 

This Regulation is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Disallowable Legislative Instrument

On 1 July 2022, the Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Amendment (2022 Measures No. 2) Regulations 2022 (PSR Amendment Regulations) amended the Principal Regulations to introduce a new 30/20. Under the 30/20 rule, a medical practitioner is taken to have engaged in inappropriate practice if they have rendered or initiated 30 or more ‘relevant phone services’ on each of 20 or more days in a 12 month period. Relevant phone service is defined in section 5 of the Principal Regulations and includes phone services performed by GPs, other medical practitioners in general practice, and consultant physicians.

 

The Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Amendment (2022 Measures No. 3) Regulations 2022 (the Regulations) amends the Principal Regulations to temporarily remove the 30/20 rule from the prescribed pattern of services rules. This recognises that practitioners may be required to temporarily render more phone services as COVID-19 infections increase across the community, as they will be treating more positive COVID-19 patients while also managing the risk of transmission. The Government’s intention is that this rule will recommence on
1 October 2022.

The Regulations will retrospectively commence immediately after the commencement of the PSR Amendment Regulations on 1 July 2022 to temporarily cease the introduction of the 30/20 rule. The amendments to the prescribed patterns of service rules in the Regulations will not negatively disadvantage practitioners as these changes allow practitioners to continue providing phone services without being taken to have engaged in inappropriate practice from 1 July 2022.

Human rights implications

The Regulations engage Articles 9 and 12 of the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), specifically the rights to health and social security.

The Right to Health

The right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health is contained in Article 12(1) of the ICESCR. The UN Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights (the Committee) has stated that the right to health is not a right for each individual to be healthy, but is a right to a system of health protection which provides equality of opportunity for people to enjoy the highest attainable level of health.

The Committee reports that the ‘highest attainable standard of health’ takes into account the country’s available resources. This right may be understood as a right of access to a variety of public health and health care facilities, goods, services, programs, and conditions necessary for the realisation of the highest attainable standard of health.

The Right to Social Security

The right to social security is contained in Article 9 of the ICESCR. It requires that a country must, within its maximum available resources, ensure access to a social security scheme that provides a minimum essential level of benefits to all individuals and families that will enable them to acquire at least essential health care. Countries are obliged to demonstrate that every effort has been made to use all resources that are at their disposal in an effort to satisfy, as a matter of priority, this minimum obligation.

The Committee reports that there is a strong presumption that retrogressive measures taken in relation to the right to social security are prohibited under ICESCR. In this context, a retrogressive measure would be one taken without adequate justification that had the effect of reducing existing levels of social security benefits, or of denying benefits to persons or groups previously entitled to them. However, it is legitimate for a Government to re-direct its limited resources in ways that it considers to be more effective at meeting the general health needs of all society, particularly the needs of the more disadvantaged members of society.

The right of equality and non-discrimination

The rights of equality and non-discrimination are contained in articles 2, 16 and 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).  Article 26 of the ICCPR requires that all persons are equal before the law, are entitled without any discrimination to the equal protection of the law and in this respect, the law shall prohibit any discrimination and guarantee to all persons equal and effective protection against discrimination on any ground such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.

Analysis

The Regulations maintain rights to health and social security and the right of equality and non-discrimination as it does not change any entitlements to Medicare benefits for clinically relevant services available under the Medicare Benefits Schedule.

Conclusion

This instrument is compatible with human rights because it maintains existing arrangements and the protection of human rights.

 

 

Mark Butler

Minister for Health and Aged Care

Overview

The Health Insurance Act 1973, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, serves to regulate the health insurance system in Australia, ensuring fair and efficient access to health services. It establishes the Professional Services Review (PSR) Scheme to review and investigate the provision of services by health practitioners to determine if they have engaged in inappropriate practice, with the aim of maintaining the quality and integrity of health services. In response to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Amendment (2022 Measures No. 3) Regulations 2022 were introduced to temporarily suspend the 30/20 rule, which would otherwise classify medical practitioners as engaging in inappropriate practice if they rendered or initiated 30 or more phone services on 20 or more days within a 12-month period. This suspension acknowledges the increased demand for phone services due to the pandemic and aims to support practitioners in managing the risk of transmission while treating more COVID-19 patients. The policy objective is to ensure practitioners can continue to provide necessary services without the risk of being deemed to engage in inappropriate practice during this period.

Scope and Application

The Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Amendment (2022 Measures No. 3) Regulations 2022 apply to medical practitioners and entities involved in the provision of health services within the Commonwealth of Australia. These Regulations specifically address the Professional Services Review Scheme under the Health Insurance Act 1973, which reviews and investigates the provision of services to determine if inappropriate practice has occurred. The Regulations amend the existing Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Regulations 2019 by temporarily removing the 30/20 rule, which previously identified inappropriate practice if a medical practitioner rendered or initiated 30 or more relevant phone services on each of 20 or more days in a 12-month period. This temporary measure recognises the increased demand for phone services due to the COVID-19 pandemic, allowing practitioners to provide more services without being considered to be engaging in inappropriate practice. The Regulations are set to commence immediately after the Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Amendment (2022 Measures No. 2) Regulations 2022 and will remain in effect until the Government decides to recommence the 30/20 rule, anticipated to be on 1 October 2022.

Key Provisions

The Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Amendment (2022 Measures No. 3) Regulations 2022 (the Regulations) amend the Health Insurance (Professional Services Review Scheme) Regulations 2019 (the Principal Regulations) by temporarily removing the 30/20 rule from the prescribed pattern of services rules. The 30/20 rule, introduced on 1 July 2022, stipulated that a medical practitioner is taken to have engaged in inappropriate practice if they rendered or initiated 30 or more ‘relevant phone services’ on each of 20 or more days in a 12-month period. The Regulations aim to acknowledge that practitioners may need to provide more phone services during the COVID-19 pandemic, without penalising them for doing so. Consequently, the Regulations temporarily remove this rule, allowing practitioners to continue providing phone services without being considered to have engaged in inappropriate practice from 1 July 2022. The Regulations impose obligations on medical practitioners by temporarily removing the 30/20 rule. This allows practitioners to render more phone services without being deemed to have engaged in inappropriate practice, as per Section 8 of the Principal Regulations. However, practitioners must still adhere to the 80/20 rule, which states that they will be considered to have engaged in inappropriate practice if they have rendered or initiated 80 or more ‘relevant services’ on each of 20 or more days in a 12-month period. Additionally, practitioners must continue to comply with any other applicable rules and requirements under the Health Insurance Act 1973 (the Act) and the Professional Services Review Scheme. There are no specific offences, penalties, or consequences mentioned for breaching the Regulations themselves. However, breaches of the Act or the Professional Services Review Scheme may result in penalties, sanctions, or other consequences. For example, under Section 133 of the Act, a practitioner found to have engaged in inappropriate practice may be subject to disciplinary action by the relevant professional body, including fines, suspension, or revocation of their registration. Furthermore, the Act may impose administrative penalties for non-compliance with certain requirements or obligations, such as providing false or misleading information or failing to cooperate with a review or investigation. The maximum penalties for such offences may vary depending on the specific provision breached and the circumstances of the case.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Health Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.