Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 2)

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2006L01210 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Select Legislative Instrument 2006 No. 85

 

Minute No. 8 of 2006 – Minister for Health and Ageing

 

Subject:  Health Insurance Act 1973

 

Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 2)

 

Subsection 133(1) of the Health Insurance Act 1973 (the Act) provides that the

Governor-General may make regulations, not inconsistent with the Act, prescribing all matters required or permitted by the Act to be prescribed, or necessary or convenient to be prescribed for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.

 

The Act provides, in part, for payments of Medicare benefits in respect of professional services rendered to eligible persons.  Section 9 of the Act provides that Medicare benefits shall be calculated by reference to the fees for medical services, including diagnostic imaging services, set out in prescribed tables.

 

Section 4AA of the Act provides that the regulations may prescribe a table of diagnostic imaging services, the amount of fees applicable in respect of each item and the rules for interpretation of the table.  Schedule 1 to the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Regulations 2005 (the Principal Regulations) prescribes such a table.

 

The purpose of the Regulations is to:

  • provide Medicare eligibility for diagnostic Computed Tomography (CT) scans performed on a dual purpose (hybrid) machine;
  • ensure consistency with the reporting requirements for CT and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans;
  • omit an obsolete rule of interpretation for MRI; and
  • specify that certain CT items of service are not to be claimed if performed to image the coronary arteries.

 

The Australian Government (as represented by the Department of Health and Ageing) manages Medicare funding for diagnostic imaging services through four agreements known as the “2003-2008 Quality and Outlays Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs)”.  The MoUs cover radiology, cardiac imaging, nuclear medicine imaging and obstetric and gynaecological ultrasound services.

 

The amendments to the Principal Regulations affect only those services covered by the Radiology MoU.  They were developed in consultation with the Radiology MoU Management Committee which includes representatives from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, the Australian Diagnostic Imaging Association and Medicare Australia.

 

Details of the Regulations are provided in the Attachment.

 

The Act specifies no conditions that need to be met before the power to make the Regulations may be exercised.

 

The Regulations would be a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

 

The Regulations would commence on 1 May 2006.

 

 

        Authority:  Subsection 133(1) of the                                                                                                                                                          Health Insurance Act 1973


ATTACHMENT

 

DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED HEALTH INSURANCE (DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING SERVICES TABLE) AMENDMENT REGULATIONS 2006 (No. 2)

 

Regulation 1 – Name of Regulations

 

This regulation provides that the title of the Regulations is the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 2).

 

Regulation 2 - Commencement

 

This regulation provides for the amendment regulations to commence on 1 May 2006.

 

Regulation 3 – Amendments

 

This regulation provides that the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Regulations 2005 (the Principal Regulations) are amended as set out in the attached Schedule.

 

Schedule - Amendments

 

Part 2 - Rules of interpretation

 

Item [1] – rules of interpretation 19 and 20

 

Rule of interpretation 20 in Part 2 to Schedule 1 to the Principal Regulations precludes payment of a Medicare benefit if a scan is performed using a Hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) scanner.  This is because previous hybrid machine models have not been capable of producing scans of the same quality as those performed on a stand-alone CT machine.  However, current evidence suggests that modern hybrid machines are capable of producing the same quality scans as those provided on a stand-alone CT machine.

 

Rules of interpretation 19 and 20, as substituted, would provide for a CT scan performed on a stand-alone or hybrid machine to be Medicare-eligible only if performed for diagnostic purposes by a specialist radiologist:

 

-            rule of interpretation 19 would be amended to prescribe in paragraph 19(1)(b) that in addition to the service being provided under the professional supervision of a specialist radiologist, the CT scan must also be reported by a specialist radiologist, and

-            rule of interpretation 20 would prescribe that a CT service is not an eligible service if performed as part of another diagnostic imaging procedure which uses CT to enhance the image (attenuation correction) or provide detailed information about the location, size and shape of lesions in the body (anatomical correlation).

 

Item [2] – Rule of interpretation 33

 

Rule of interpretation 33 is substituted to provide in paragraph 33(1)(b) that a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) service is to be reported by an eligible provider as described in rule of interpretation 34.  This amendment is to ensure consistency of the rules of interpretation for reporting requirements for CT scans and MRI/MRA scans.

 

Item [3] – Rule of interpretation 34

 

Paragraphs (1) and (2) of rule of interpretation 34 are amended by omitting reference to “rule 33” and inserting “subrule 33(1)” to reflect the proposed amendment to rule of interpretation 33.

 

Item [4] – Rule of interpretation 39

 

Paragraph 3 of rule of interpretation 39 prescribes that one fee applies if two or more MRI musculoskeletal services are provided to a person on a single occasion.  It was introduced in the Principal Regulations from 1 August 2004 as part of a major restructure of MRI services from 1 August 2004.

 

The Principal Regulations were further amended from 1 November 2004 to provide in paragraphs 2 and 3 of rule of interpretation 38 for a discounted fee model to apply when two or more MRI musculoskeletal services are provided to the same patient on the same day.  Paragraph 3 of rule of interpretation 39 no longer applied but was not omitted from the Principal Regulations at that time.

 

Paragraph 3 of rule of interpretation 39 is omitted from the Principal Regulations as it has been superseded by paragraphs 2 and 3 of rule of interpretation 38.

 

Part 3 - Services and Fees

 

Items [5] to [9]

 

When CT items of service were introduced in the Principal Regulations in 1996, CT equipment was incapable of performing scans of the coronary arteries.  However, with advances in CT technology, scanning of the coronary arteries is now possible.

 

Items of service 56301 to 56347, 56801 to 57047, 57350, 57351, 57355 and 57356 would be amended to clarify that a CT scan for the purpose of imaging the coronary arteries is currently not eligible for a Medicare benefit. However, this is being reviewed by the Medical Services Advisory Committee to determine its safety, efficacy and cost effectiveness for possible inclusion in the MBS.

Overview

The Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 2) were enacted by the Minister for Health and Ageing under subsection 133(1) of the Health Insurance Act 1973. This legislative instrument was designed to address the need for updating Medicare benefits related to diagnostic imaging services, ensuring they reflect advancements in medical technology and the evolving quality of hybrid machines. The regulations were developed in consultation with relevant medical and professional associations, including the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists and the Australian Diagnostic Imaging Association, to maintain consistency and accuracy in the provision of Medicare benefits for diagnostic imaging services. The primary policy objective of these amendments is to align the Medicare benefits for diagnostic imaging services with contemporary medical practices and technologies, thereby ensuring that Medicare remains an effective and equitable healthcare funding system. By updating the eligibility criteria for certain diagnostic imaging services, the regulations aim to provide appropriate reimbursement for services rendered, reflecting the advancements in technology and the evolving standards of care. These amendments also address specific inconsistencies and omissions in the existing regulations, ensuring a coherent and updated framework for the delivery of diagnostic imaging services under the Medicare system.

Scope and Application

The Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 2) applies to the Health Insurance Act 1973, which provides for payments of Medicare benefits in respect of professional services rendered to eligible persons. This legislation governs the calculation of Medicare benefits by reference to the fees for medical services, including diagnostic imaging services, set out in prescribed tables. The regulations were developed to amend the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Regulations 2005 to ensure consistency in reporting requirements for CT and MRI scans, and to update rules for interpretation and eligibility of diagnostic imaging services. The amendments primarily affect diagnostic imaging services covered by the Radiology MoU, which includes representatives from relevant professional and industry bodies. The regulations commenced on 1 May 2006 and were made under subsection 133(1) of the Health Insurance Act 1973. There are no exclusions or exemptions specified in the regulations; however, certain CT items of service are not eligible for a Medicare benefit if performed to image the coronary arteries, pending further review. The regulations extend the application of the Act through subordinate instruments by specifying amendments to the Principal Regulations.

Key Provisions

The Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Amendment Regulations 2006 (No. 2) amends the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Regulations 2005. The main changes are detailed in the attached Schedule and include adjustments to the rules of interpretation and services covered under the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) for diagnostic imaging services. Specifically, these regulations address the eligibility of Computed Tomography (CT) scans performed on hybrid machines, reporting requirements for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, the omission of an obsolete rule for MRI, and clarification on the eligibility of CT scans for imaging coronary arteries (Regulation 3). Under these regulations, several obligations are imposed on parties involved in the provision of diagnostic imaging services. Firstly, CT scans performed on dual-purpose (hybrid) machines must now meet specific criteria to be eligible for Medicare benefits. These scans must be diagnostic in nature and performed by a specialist radiologist, as outlined in amended rules of interpretation 19 and 20 (Schedule, Items [1]). Secondly, MRI and Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) scans must be reported by an eligible provider as stipulated in the updated rule of interpretation 33 (Schedule, Item [2]). Additionally, certain CT services aimed at imaging the coronary arteries are currently ineligible for Medicare benefits, pending further review by the Medical Services Advisory Committee (Schedule, Items [5] to [9]). Failure to comply with these regulations could lead to non-payment of Medicare benefits for the services provided, which could result in financial losses for the service providers. Additionally, providing misleading information or intentionally circumventing these rules could be considered fraudulent activity, which might attract more severe penalties under other sections of the Health Insurance Act 1973 or related legislation. Although the explanatory statement does not specify exact penalties, breaches of the Act can result in substantial fines and, in severe cases, criminal charges. The maximum penalties for fraudulent claims under the Health Insurance Act can include fines of up to $21,000 for individuals and $105,000 for corporations, along with potential imprisonment terms.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Health Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.