Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Capital Sensitivity) Amendment Determination 2012

Administered by Department of Health, Disability and Ageing

Legislation au F2012L01185 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Health and Ageing

 

Health Insurance Act 1973

 

Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Capital Sensitivity) Amendment Determination 2012

 

 

Subsection 3C(1) of the Health Insurance Act 1973 (the Act) provides, in part, that the Minister may determine in writing that a health service not listed in the diagnostic imaging services table (the Table) shall, in specified circumstances and for specified statutory provisions, be treated as if it were so listed.  The Table is set out in the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Regulations (the DIST Regulations) which are remade each year.

 

Purpose

This Determination amends the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Capital Sensitivity) Determination 2011 (the Principal Determination) to give effect to the second phase of the Capital Sensitivity 2009-10 Budget Measure. The capital sensitivity arrangements prescribed in this Determination are not significantly different from those set out in the Principal Determination.  This Determination revokes some of the transitional provisions in the Principal Determination that are now obsolete and sets out the eligibility criteria for practices wishing to seek an exemption for inner regional areas.

 

Background

The Principal Determination introduced new services eligible for Medicare benefits to align with the ‘Changes to fees for fully depreciated diagnostic imaging equipment’ Capital Sensitivity 2009-10 Budget measure.  This measure is about improving the quality of diagnostic imaging services by encouraging diagnostic imaging service providers to upgrade and replace as appropriate, aged equipment.  For each relevant service in the current DIST Regulations, the Principal Determination introduced a new service with a 50 per cent reduced Medicare Benefit Schedule Fee which applies where the equipment used to perform the service is older than:

                     if the equipment has not been upgraded, the new effective life age; or

                     if the equipment has been upgraded, the maximum effective life age.

 

Details of the Determination are set out in the Attachment.

 

The Determination commences on 1 July 2012.

 

The Determination is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the
Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

 

Consultation

Since the measure was announced, consultation with stakeholders has been ongoing.  These consultations helped to shape the initial implementation arrangements prescribed by the Principal Determination for the period from 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012.  This included the new effective life period and the five-year extension period for appropriate upgrades, which differed from the original age restrictions based on the Australian Taxation Office depreciation schedule.

 

The phased implementation arrangements have helped to ensure consideration of the issues associated with the age of equipment, what constitutes an upgrade across the different modalities and remote area exemptions.  This further analysis and consultation since 30 June 2011 have determined the ongoing arrangements which are implemented through this Determination.

 


ATTACHMENT

 

DETAILS OF THE HEALTH INSURANCE (DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING CAPITAL SENSITIVITY) AMENDMENT DETERMINATION 2012

 

 

Section 1 – Name of Determination

 

Section 1 provides that the title of the Determination is the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Capital Sensitivity) Amendment Determination 2012 (the Determination).

 

Section 2 – Commencement

 

Section 2 provides that the Determination commences on 1 July 2012.

 

Section 3 – Amendment of Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Capital Sensitivity) Determination 2011

 

Section 3 provides that Schedule 1 of the Determination amends the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Capital Sensitivity) Determination 2011 (the Principal Determination).

 

Schedule 1

 

Item 1

This item omits the definition of DIST Regulations. This is a technical amendment to ensure that the Principal Determination refers to the diagnostic imaging services table, which is defined in

subsection 3(1) of the Health Insurance Act 1973, consistently throughout the Principal Determination.

 

Item 2

This is a technical amendment as a consequence of item 1 and replaces references to ‘DIST Regulations’ with ‘diagnostic imaging services table’, wherever that first term is used.

 

Item 3

This item is a technical amendment that ensures that the general medical services table, which is defined in subsection 3(1) of the Health Insurance Act 1973, is consistently referred to throughout the Principal Determination.

 

Item 4

This item substitutes a new section 6 as a consequence of certain subsections of the Principal Determination now being obsolete (subsections 6(2), 6(3) and 6(4) prior to the amendments in this Determination commencing).

 

Schedule 1 to the Principal Determination provides for (NK) items. Subsection 6(1) provides that an (NK) item applies to a service which is performed using:

                     diagnostic imaging equipment with an age that exceeds the new effective life age specified for that type of equipment which has not been upgraded; or

                     upgraded diagnostic imaging equipment with an age that exceeds the maximum extended life age specified for that type of equipment.

 

Subsections 6(2) to 6(8) specify circumstances in which (NK) items do not apply.

Subsections 6(2) and 6(3) provide an exemption from the application of (NK) items where the relevant diagnostic imaging equipment is ordinarily located at diagnostic imaging premises or a base for mobile diagnostic imaging equipment in any of Outer Regional Australia, Remote Australia or Very Remote Australia (as defined in the Australian Standard Geographical Classification).

Subsection 6(4) provides that (NK) items do not apply where the Secretary has granted an exemption in relation to inner regional areas under subsection 6(5). That subsection also provides that the (NK) items do not apply where the proprietor has been notified by the Department of the receipt of a valid application for an exemption in relation to inner regional areas and a decision has not been made by the Secretary. The subsection also provides that the (NK) items do not apply during any reconsideration of refusal to grant an exemption (see section 8 of Principal Determination and item 5 of this Determination).

Subsection 6(5) provides that the Secretary may grant an exemption in respect of diagnostic imaging equipment where the Secretary is satisfied that the diagnostic imaging equipment is operated on a rare and sporadic basis and provides crucial patient access to diagnostic imaging services.

Subsection 6(6) provides that the Secretary is to make a decision within 28 days of the day on which the relevant proprietor was given notice of a valid application.

Subsections 6(7) and 6(8) provide that only practices located at diagnostic imaging premises or a base for mobile diagnostic imaging equipment in an area classified as Inner Regional Australia (Remoteness Area 1) and RRMA 4 or 5 (small rural centre or other rural area) and whose diagnostic imaging equipment exceeds the maximum extended life age by less than three years are eligible to apply for an inner regional exemption. Applications by practices must be made in writing. The Department will notify proprietors of the receipt of a valid application. Proprietors can identify whether they fall under RRMA 4 or 5 at the Department's DoctorConnect website:  www.doctorconnect.gov.au

 

Item 5

This item substitutes a new section 8 in relation to reconsideration decisions. This is consequential amendment as a result of amendments to section 6 made by item 4 of this Determination.

 


 

Overview

The Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Capital Sensitivity) Amendment Determination 2012 was introduced by the Minister for Health and Ageing to amend the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Capital Sensitivity) Determination 2011, thereby implementing the second phase of the Capital Sensitivity 2009-10 Budget Measure. This measure aims to improve the quality of diagnostic imaging services by encouraging service providers to upgrade and replace outdated equipment. The Amendment Determination aligns with the changes to fees for fully depreciated diagnostic imaging equipment, which include reduced Medicare Benefit Schedule Fees for services performed using equipment older than the specified effective or maximum extended life ages. The Amendment Determination also updates the eligibility criteria for exemptions in inner regional areas and removes obsolete transitional provisions from the Principal Determination. It commenced on 1 July 2012, and is a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The determination reflects ongoing consultations with stakeholders, which helped refine the implementation arrangements for the period from 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012, addressing issues related to equipment age, upgrades, and exemptions for remote areas.

Scope and Application

The Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Capital Sensitivity) Amendment Determination 2012 is a legislative instrument that amends the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Capital Sensitivity) Determination 2011 to implement the second phase of the Capital Sensitivity 2009-10 Budget Measure. This measure aims to improve the quality of diagnostic imaging services by encouraging service providers to upgrade and replace aged equipment. The Determination applies to the diagnostic imaging services listed in the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Services Table) Regulations, which are remade each year, and it applies to persons and entities that provide these services. The geographic reach of the Determination is national, as it applies to practices across Australia. The Determination sets out eligibility criteria for practices in inner regional areas to seek an exemption from the reduced Medicare Benefit Schedule Fee for using older diagnostic imaging equipment. This Determination revokes some of the transitional provisions in the Principal Determination that are now obsolete and sets out the eligibility criteria for practices wishing to seek an exemption for inner regional areas. The Determination is a legislative instrument for the purposes of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and commenced on 1 July 2012.

Key Provisions

The Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Capital Sensitivity) Amendment Determination 2012 (the Determination) amends the Health Insurance (Diagnostic Imaging Capital Sensitivity) Determination 2011 (the Principal Determination) to implement the second phase of the Capital Sensitivity 2009-10 Budget Measure, as outlined in subsection 3C(1) of the Health Insurance Act 1973 (the Act). This Determination specifically addresses the eligibility criteria for practices in inner regional areas seeking exemptions for using older diagnostic imaging equipment, while also revoking obsolete transitional provisions from the Principal Determination (Sections 1-3). The capital sensitivity arrangements remain largely unchanged from those in the Principal Determination, continuing to incentivise the replacement or upgrade of aged diagnostic imaging equipment by offering a 50% reduced Medicare Benefit Schedule Fee for services performed with equipment that exceeds the new effective life age or the maximum extended life age (Schedule 1, Item 4). The Determination imposes several obligations on parties governed by it. Diagnostic imaging service providers must ensure that their equipment either meets the age criteria for the reduced fee or undergoes appropriate upgrades. Practices in inner regional areas that wish to apply for an exemption must do so in writing and demonstrate that their equipment is used on a rare and sporadic basis, providing crucial patient access to diagnostic imaging services (Schedule 1, Item 5). Additionally, the Secretary is required to make a decision on exemption applications within 28 days of receiving a valid application (Schedule 1, Item 4(6)). Breaches of the provisions in this Determination may lead to various consequences. While the Determination does not explicitly list specific offences, failure to comply with the requirements for equipment upgrades or accurate reporting of service provision could result in financial penalties or recovery of incorrectly paid benefits. The Act itself provides for general penalties for fraudulent or misleading conduct, which could include fines or imprisonment. The specific penalties are not detailed within the Determination but would be in accordance with the provisions of the Health Insurance Act 1973 and other applicable laws (Section 3C(1)).

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Health Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Enforcement Powers
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.