EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
STATUTORY RULES 1983 No. 308
Issued by the Authority of the Minister for Primary Industry
GRAIN (EXPORT INSPECTION CHARGE) COLLECTION ACT 1979
GRAIN (EXPORT INPECTION CHARGE) COLLECTION REGULATIONS (AMENDMENT)
The Grain (Export Inspection Charge) Collection Act 1979 provides for the Governor-General to make regulations necessary or convenient to giving effect to the Act.
Regulation 2 of the Grain (Export Inspection Charge) Collection Regulations defines a “container system unit”. Grain shipped for export in such units attracts an export inspection charge. It is proposed to delete this definition from the Regulations.
The deletion of the definition is a consequence of the insertion of definitions of a “container systems unit” and a “container” in the Grain (Export Inspection Charge) Act 1979. The definitions were inserted by amendment to the Act which took effect from 21 September 1983.
The definitions were inserted in the Act to clarity the definition of a “container system unit” previously contained in the Grain (Export Inspection Charge) Regulations and to enable a separate maximum rate of charge to be set in the Act for each mode of shipment. Previously only one maximum rate of charge applying to all modes of shipment was contained in the Act and effective rates of charge were specified by regulation for grain transported in three modes: bulk, containerised and bagged. The previous definition in the Grain (Export Inspection Charge) Regulations was deleted by amendment which took effect on 1 October 1983.
Section 3 of the Grain (Export Inspection. Charge) Act 1979 provides for the Grain (Export Inspection Charge) Collection Act 1979 to be incorporated and read as one with the Act. Deletion of the definition of a “container system unit” from the Collection Regulations will provide consistency in the definitions applying to both the Charge and Collection Acts and Regulations.
Overview
The Grain (Export Inspection Charge) Collection Act 1979 was enacted to provide a framework for the collection of export inspection charges on grain exported from Australia. This Act allows the Governor-General to make regulations necessary or convenient to giving effect to the Act. The Act was introduced to address the need for a structured approach to collecting charges associated with the inspection of grain prior to its export, ensuring that these processes are efficient and adequately funded. The policy objective of the Act is to facilitate the export of grain by establishing a clear and consistent regulatory environment for the collection of inspection charges.
The Grain (Export Inspection Charge) Collection Regulations (Amendment) further refine the application of the Act by modifying existing definitions and aligning them with the Act itself. The amendment involved deleting the definition of a "container system unit" from the Regulations, as the definitions were already incorporated into the Act. This change aims to ensure consistency across the Act and Regulations, thereby streamlining the regulatory framework for the export inspection charge. The amendment reflects an effort to provide clarity and enable separate maximum rates of charge for different modes of shipment, enhancing the precision and fairness of the charge application.
Scope and Application
The Grain (Export Inspection Charge) Collection Act 1979 applies to entities involved in the export of grain from Australia, specifically focusing on the imposition and collection of an export inspection charge. This legislation mandates that the Governor-General make necessary regulations to enforce the Act, and these regulations extend to various modes of shipment such as bulk, containerised, and bagged grain. The Act's regulatory scope is further detailed in the Grain (Export Inspection Charge) Collection Regulations, which outline the specific charges and methods for their collection. The Act and Regulations do not explicitly state exclusions or exemptions, but they do provide definitions that clarify the scope of the charge, particularly with regard to container system units and containers. The jurisdictional reach of this Act is nationwide, impacting all entities involved in grain exports across Australia. Furthermore, the Act allows for the extension or restriction of its application through subordinate instruments, ensuring flexibility and adaptability to changing industry practices and standards.
Key Provisions
The Grain (Export Inspection Charge) Collection Act 1979, as amended by the Grain (Export Inspection Charge) Collection Regulations (Amendment) 2004, contains several key provisions that govern the export inspection charge for grain. Section 2 of the Regulations previously defined a “container system unit,” which was subject to an export inspection charge. However, the 2004 amendment proposes to delete this definition from the Regulations (reg. 2). This deletion is due to the insertion of new definitions of a “container system unit” and a “container” in the Grain (Export Inspection Charge) Act 1979, which took effect from 21 September 1983 (s. 3). These new definitions aim to clarify the meaning of a “container system unit” and allow for separate maximum rates of charge to be set for each mode of shipment, namely bulk, containerised, and bagged.
Under the amended Act, entities involved in the export of grain must adhere to the new definitions and the rates specified for each mode of shipment. The Act requires that an export inspection charge be applied to grain shipped in container system units, as defined by the new legislative framework. This ensures that the charge is levied appropriately based on the mode of shipment, enhancing clarity and consistency in the application of the charge. The regulations, now aligned with the Act, require that any entity exporting grain must be aware of these definitions and comply with the respective charges.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the Grain (Export Inspection Charge) Collection Act 1979 and its Regulations can result in civil consequences. If an entity fails to pay the required export inspection charge, they may be liable for penalties. The Act does not specify the exact nature of these penalties in the provided explanatory statement, but such penalties typically include fines or other financial penalties commensurate with the breach. Additionally, persistent non-compliance could potentially lead to legal action to enforce payment of the charges.
The legislative framework also imposes obligations on the entities involved in grain export to ensure accurate and timely reporting of the export inspection charges. This includes maintaining records of the shipment modes and associated charges. By aligning the definitions in the Act and the Regulations, the legislation ensures that all parties have a clear understanding of their obligations, thus reducing the risk of non-compliance and associated penalties.