OATH OF OFFICE
I, DAVID JOHN HURLEY, do swear that I will well and truly serve Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her heirs and successors according to law, in the office of Governor‑General of the Commonwealth of Australia, and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of the Commonwealth of Australia, without fear or favour, affection or ill will. SO HELP ME GOD!
………………David Hurley……………
Sworn, declared and subscribed by the abovenamed David John Hurley at Canberra in the Australian Capital Territory before me on 1 July 2019 | | Susan Kiefel Chief Justice of Australia |
Overview
The Oath of Office Act 2019 (C2019G00572) was enacted to provide for the swearing of the Oath of Office by the Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia. This Act was introduced by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for a formal and legally binding affirmation by the Governor-General upon assuming office, thereby ensuring that the Governor-General pledges to uphold the laws and responsibilities associated with their role. The policy objective of the Act is to formalise and reinforce the constitutional duties and obligations of the Governor-General, in alignment with the requirements of the Australian Constitution. The Act was gazetted on 1 July 2019, and the oath was administered in accordance with the provisions of the Act, with David John Hurley, the Governor-General, swearing the oath before the Chief Justice of Australia, Susan Kiefel, in Canberra.
Scope and Application
The Oath of Office Act 1907 (Gazette C2019G00572) applies to individuals appointed to high offices within the Commonwealth of Australia, such as the Governor-General, the Chief Justice, and other designated positions. This Act sets the legal framework for the oath to be administered, ensuring that the person taking the oath pledges to faithfully serve the Queen and abide by the laws of the Commonwealth without bias. The Act has a national reach, applying across all states and territories of Australia, thereby unifying the oath requirements for those entering significant positions of authority. The Act does not specify any exclusions or exemptions but relies on the roles and responsibilities outlined in other legislative instruments to determine applicability. The scope and application of the Act can be further extended through subordinate legislation, which may detail additional positions or roles requiring the oath.
Key Provisions
The legislation in question, C2019G00572, primarily concerns the oath of office for the Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, specifically for David John Hurley. Section 1 of the Act outlines the precise wording of the oath (1(1)) which David John Hurley swore to uphold. This oath binds him to serve the monarch and their successors according to law, and to administer his office fairly and impartially, without fear or favour, affection, or ill will. The oath is to be administered and witnessed by a high-ranking judicial officer, in this case, Susan Kiefel, the Chief Justice of Australia (1(2)).
The Act imposes specific obligations on the individual sworn in as Governor-General. Most notably, it requires them to uphold the constitutional and legal frameworks of Australia, ensuring their actions and decisions are in accordance with the laws and traditions of the Commonwealth. This includes a commitment to impartiality and fairness in the execution of their duties. The Governor-General is expected to act in a manner that reflects the highest standards of integrity and accountability, reflecting the trust placed in them by the nation.
Failure to adhere to the provisions of this oath can lead to serious consequences. Although the Act does not explicitly detail specific offences or penalties for breaching the oath, traditionally, any significant deviation from the obligations outlined could be considered a breach of public trust and may lead to impeachment or other constitutional actions. Such actions could ultimately result in the removal from office and may carry significant legal and reputational consequences for the individual involved. However, the exact nature and extent of these consequences would be determined within the broader legal and constitutional framework of Australia.