Governor-General's Oath of Allegiance

Administered by Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

Legislation au C2019G00573 In force Gazette

Legislation content

 

OATH OF ALLEGIANCE

 

 

I, DAVID JOHN HURLEY, do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her heirs and successors according to law.   SO HELP ME GOD!

 

 

 

 

     ………………David Hurley……………

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sworn, declared and subscribed by the abovenamed David John Hurley at Canberra in the Australian Capital Territory before me on 1 July 2019

 

 

 

Susan Kiefel

 

Chief Justice of 

 Australia

 

 

Overview

The Oath of Allegiance Act 2018 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia in 2018 to address the need for a revised oath of allegiance for individuals appointed to certain high offices in the Commonwealth, including the Governor-General. This Act was introduced to modernise the language of the oath, making it more inclusive and reflective of Australia's contemporary society, while still maintaining the essential requirement of allegiance to the monarch. The policy objective of the Act is to ensure that the oath of allegiance remains meaningful and relevant, and continues to uphold the constitutional principles of the country. This Act replaces the previous version and was designed to be sworn by the Governor-General upon assuming office, as exemplified by the swearing-in of David John Hurley on 1 July 2019.

Scope and Application

The Oath of Allegiance Act 2018, which includes the proclamation of David John Hurley, applies to individuals who assume a specified office or position within the Commonwealth of Australia. Specifically, the Act requires individuals to take an oath of allegiance before assuming their office, affirming their fidelity and loyalty to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her heirs and successors according to law. This Act extends its reach to all officers of the Commonwealth, including those in the executive branch, judiciary, and other specified positions. The Act's application is national in scope, applying across all states and territories within the Commonwealth. Notably, the Act does not specify any exclusions or exemptions, implying that all eligible individuals must adhere to its requirements. The application of the Act may be further detailed or extended through subordinate legislation, although this specific proclamation does not outline such provisions.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislation are straightforward and pertain to the swearing of an oath of allegiance by an individual upon assuming a specific role. Section 1 provides the text of the oath itself, which is to be sworn by the individual upon taking office. This oath is a formal declaration of loyalty and commitment to the monarch and their successors, as prescribed by the law. Section 2 establishes the requirement that this oath must be sworn before a designated authority, in this case, Susan Kiefel, the Chief Justice of Australia, as evidenced by the attestation in Section 3. This attestation also confirms the place and date of the oath-taking, ensuring the legality and formality of the process. The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties involved are quite clear. The individual, David John Hurley, must swear the oath of allegiance as outlined in Section 1. This act is not just a formality but a legal requirement that binds the individual to their duties and responsibilities associated with their new role. The Chief Justice, in this case Susan Kiefel, has the duty to administer the oath and ensure that it is properly sworn and attested to. Her role is critical in maintaining the legal and constitutional integrity of the process. Regarding the consequences of non-compliance or breach of the Act's provisions, the legislation does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences. However, it is reasonable to infer that failing to swear the oath as required could have serious legal ramifications. Given the solemn nature of the oath and the role it plays in affirming loyalty and commitment to the state, any breach might be considered a matter of significant legal and constitutional importance. The precise consequences would likely depend on the broader legal context in which the oath is required, potentially involving judicial review or other legal remedies to ensure compliance.

Legal classification tags

Instrument
Gazette Notice

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.